As a member of the European Union, the UK received structural
funding worth about £2.1 billion per year.
This funding has been used for boosting several aspects of
economic development, including support for businesses,
employment and agriculture, and is administered by the different
nations of the UK.
Now that the UK has left the EU, this funding will cease. In
order to replace it, the Government has pledged to set up a
Shared Prosperity Fund to “reduce inequalities between
communities”.
There are several issues that will need to be considered when
setting up the Fund. These include:
- the priorities and objectives of the Fund;
- the amount of money to be allocated;
- the method of allocating it between the countries and regions
of the UK, and whether this is based on need (and what measure is
used to determine need);
- the model by which funding will be allocated, whether
pre-allocating an amount for a country or region or inviting
competitive bids from across the UK;
- the length of the planning period and the way in which this
could conflict with domestic spending priorities;
- who administers the funds (whether they are controlled from
Westminster or by the devolved administrations) and the degree to
which local authorities are involved;
- the implications of the Fund for state aid rules.
Although the Government has not yet published its consultation on
the Fund, a number of organisations have already made comments
about the possible design. Although these vary in their emphasis
(for example, the Welsh Government is strongly opposed to the
idea of administering the Fund from Westminster), most
organisations seem to agree that the level of funding should be
at least maintained at its current level, it should largely be
allocated based on need, and local authorities and partners
should be closely involved.