Dawn Butler (Brent Central) (Lab) (Urgent Question): To ask
the Secretary of State for Education to make a statement on the
appointment of Toby Young to the board of the Office for Students.
The Minister for Universities, Science, Research and Innovation
(Joseph Johnson) The Office for Students came into being on 1
January and will be operational from April. It will put quality of
teaching, student choice and value for...Request free trial
(Brent Central) (Lab)
(Urgent Question): To ask the Secretary of State for Education to
make a statement on the appointment of Toby Young to the board of
the Office for Students.
-
The Minister for Universities, Science, Research and
Innovation (Joseph Johnson)
The Office for Students came into being on 1 January and will
be operational from April. It will put quality of teaching,
student choice and value for money at the heart of what it
does. It will be helped in that regard by a remarkably broad
and strong board bringing together a wide range of talents
and backgrounds, including vice-chancellors, graduate
employers and legal and regulatory experts, as well as a
student representative mandated by statute. The board also
brings a diversity of views: its excellent chair, Sir Michael
Barber, was a senior adviser to a former Labour Prime
Minister; and several of its members have declared themselves
to be past or present members of the Labour party. This is
clearly not a body of Conservative stooges, but one that
draws on talent wherever it can be found.
The Opposition have called this debate to discuss one of the
board’s 15 members, Toby Young. They would have us believe
that he is not qualified or suitable to be on the board. Yes,
Mr Young is not a university insider, but a board made up
only of university insiders would be hard pressed to provide
the scrutiny and challenge to the sector that students and
taxpayers deserve. Indeed, the Higher Education and Research
Act 2017 requires the Secretary of State to have regard to
the desirability of the board’s members having, between them,
far wider experience, including experience of promoting
choice for consumers and encouraging competition. Mr Young
has real experience of both as the founder of the West London
Free School, and now as director of the New Schools Network,
helping parents around the country to set up schools of their
own. That experience will be important to a new regulator
that will be charged with creating a level playing field for
high-quality new providers to offer degrees alongside
established universities.
At the West London Free School, which Mr Young set up, 38.5%
of children receive the pupil premium, and they have done
better than the national average for those on the pupil
premium this year and last. A parent-governor at the school
described him this week as being
“committed to public education, academic excellence, and
greater opportunities for kids from lower incomes”.
He has won praise for supporting diversity by making the
school a safe and supportive place for LGBT+ students. He is
also an eloquent advocate of free speech, a value that is
intrinsic to successful universities and which the OFS has
undertaken to uphold. He has served with credit on the board
of the US-UK Fulbright Commission, where he has been a strong
supporter of the commission’s work with the Sutton Trust to
help disadvantaged young people to attend US universities.
Indeed, the chair of the Fulbright Commission, Sir Nigel
Sheinwald, described Mr Young as an effective, committed and
energetic commissioner, saying that he had seen no evidence
that any of Mr Young’s remarks had influenced him in
despatching his duties as a commissioner.
The hon. Member for Brent Central (Dawn Butler) has called
today’s debate to discuss tweets and remarks, some of which
go back to the 1980s. These were foolish and wrong, and do
not reflect the values of the Government, but I am not aware
that anything Toby Young has said in the past has been found
to have breached our strong discrimination laws, which are
among the toughest in the world. In future, of course, he
will be bound to comply with the Equality Act 2010 when
performing all his functions for the Office for Students.
Regardless of the legal position, it is of course right that
Mr Young has apologised unreservedly to the OFS board. It is
also right that he has said that he regrets the comments and
given an undertaking that the kind of remarks he made in the
past will not be repeated. So be in no doubt that if he or
any board member were to make these kinds of inappropriate
comments in the future, they would be dismissed.
As the Prime Minister said yesterday, since these comments
and tweets, Mr Young has been doing “exceedingly good work”
in our education system, and it is for that reason that he is
well placed to make a valuable contribution to the work of
the board of the Office for Students, where he will continue
to do much more to support the disadvantaged than so many of
his armchair critics.
-
It is not lost on me that I am up against one of the Johnson
brothers and asking questions about one of their mates.
Mr Speaker,
“Violent, sexist and homophobic language must have no place
in our society, and parliamentarians of all parties have a
duty to stamp out this sort of behaviour wherever we
encounter it, and condemn it in the strongest possible
terms.”
Those are the words of the Secretary of State for Education
and Minister for Women and Equalities, the right hon. Member
for Putney (Justine Greening), and it is a shame that she is
not here today—I am not quite sure what job she has at the
moment. I note that the Leader of the House is with us. She
chairs an excellent committee in which we talk about
eradicating sexual harassment, victimisation and bullying,
and changing the culture in this House. I am therefore
flabbergasted by this decision, and it is beyond me how the
Minister can stand up and support the appointment of Toby
Young. I find it hard to comprehend the appointment; I
believe that it leaves the credibility of the Office for
Students in tatters.
There are three areas that need to be urgently addressed
today. The first is the process. What process was followed?
Was the Nolan principle, as outlined in the application,
applied? Was due process followed in all cases? Who was the
independent assessor—I cannot find that person’s name? Why
did the Department for Education exaggerate Toby Young’s
qualifications and suitability for the role? Has the
Commissioner for Public Appointments approved the
appointment?
The second area is suitability. Have the Department for
Education’s guidelines on the seven principles of public life
been upheld? Most people would laugh at that, but I will
leave the Minister to respond. Toby Young’s long history of
misogyny and homophobia makes a mockery of such guidelines. A
man who wrote about how he went to a gay club dressed as a
woman in order to molest lesbians is far from appropriate.
Far from apologising, however, he has defended his actions,
citing free speech. That might be free speech, but surely it
also shows that he is not suitable to hold public office.
Just 13 months ago, someone put a sexual harassment policy
document on Toby Young’s desk. He said:
“The next bit was underlined in red felt-tip pen: ‘A joke
considered amusing by one may be offensive to another.’ I
found out just how true those words were when I hired a
strippergram to surprise a male colleague on his birthday on
what turned out to be Take Our Daughters to Work Day.”
I challenge the Minister to explain that.
The third area is merit. The Prime Minister said on the steps
of No. 10 that people would be promoted on the basis of
merit, not privilege. Is that still the case, or does having
friends like the Johnsons override all that? There are over
800 free schools, meaning that there is a plethora of
suitable people who meet the criteria to be involved in the
Office for Students. Is this simply a case of jobs for the
boys? The Foreign Secretary—the Minister’s brother—declared
that Toby Young has caustic wit, making him the ideal man for
the job, but if boasting of masturbating over pictures of
dying and starving children is caustic wit, I have most
definitely lost my sense of humour. Why was the Prime
Minister not aware of the comments before the appointment was
made?
It is not too late. If there is an apology, rather than a
statement of regret, will the Minister place it in the
Library along with the more than 40,000 deleted tweets?
-
On the point of process, Mr Young’s appointment to the board
of the Office for Students was made in line with the
Commissioner for Public Appointments’ code of practice, and
Mr Young was appointed following a fair and open competition.
He was selected for interview based on the advertised
criteria and interviewed by the same panel that interviewed
all other board candidates. Sir Michael Barber, who is the
chair of the Office for Students, was one of the panel
members, along with a senior civil servant and an independent
panel member from the higher education sector, and that panel
found Mr Young to be appointable.
As for whether the Department for Education exaggerated Mr
Young’s qualifications, it absolutely and categorically did
not. Mr Young was a teaching fellow at Harvard and a teaching
assistant at Cambridge, positions for which he received
payment. The Department for Education never claimed that they
were academic posts. As I have said, Mr Young is a Fulbright
commissioner and co-founded the West London Free School, and
that experience will be vital in encouraging new providers
and ensuring that more universities are working effectively
with schools.
-
(Harlow) (Con)
The Minister will know that I am a supporter of his work and
of universities, but things have gone badly wrong here. I
accept that Mr Young has done great work on free schools, but
so have many other people. I am not talking about the things
he has done on Twitter; I am more concerned about some quite
dark articles in which he talks about the disabled and the
working classes. Much more significantly—I have the article
here—in 2015 he talked about what he calls “progressive
eugenics”, which is incredibly dark and dangerous stuff. I
suggest that my hon. Friend look again at the appointment,
because I do not think that it will give students confidence.
-
I always listen closely to what my right hon. Friend, the
Chair of the Education Committee, has to say, and I will
look carefully at the article he has with him. Mr Young has
expressed his regret and has apologised unreservedly for
comments that, in some cases, were made in the 1980s. These
are often very old writings and old pieces of work. I think
that it is more helpful to Members if we focus on what he
does rather than what he says. He has been a champion of
students and of children with disabilities in mainstream
education. He has a brother with learning disabilities and
is a patron of the residential care home in which his
brother lives, so we should not characterise him in the
crude terms that Opposition Members have used. His deeds
matter much more than the terms and the tweets that he has
disowned.
-
Several hon. Members rose—
-
Mr Speaker
Order. Using language slightly loosely, the Minister
referred at the outset to how the shadow Minister had
called this debate. On advice, I gently remind the House
that this is not supposed to be a debate or, therefore, the
occasion for speeches either from the Back Benches or the
Front Benches; it is a time for pithy questions and
answers, to which I know we will now return with
enthusiasm.
-
(Manchester Central)
(Lab/Co-op)
rose—
-
(Kilmarnock and Loudoun)
(SNP)
rose—
-
Mr Speaker
I call Mr .
-
Happy new year, Mr Speaker.
This appointment sums up this incompetent Government. Toby
Young is a Tory crony, and the Department for Education
exaggerated his qualifications. He thinks teachers have it
easy. He has shown prejudice against the working class. He
has written several misogynistic tweets and, as we have
heard, talked about masturbating to Comic Relief images of
children in Africa. When that came to light, the reaction
of Tory MPs, including the Foreign Secretary, was to defend
him.
Young himself does not seem to care. He has not made a full
apology, and he says that most of the tweets are several
years old, which also seems to be the Minister’s attitude.
Frankly, the Minister is putting his head in the sand. It
was only two years ago that Toby Young was writing about
eugenics for the working class. This House is supposed to
be trying to be seen to clean up its act and Conservative
Members were only too keen to call for action against the
hon. Member for Sheffield, Hallam (Jared O'Mara) when his
inappropriate tweets were made public, so the rank
hypocrisy is absolutely stinking.
It has been suggested that Toby Young is on a yellow card,
so will the Minister tell us what constitutes a red card?
Will this appointment process be reviewed? What will the
Government do to allay the concerns of the National Education Union, of students
and of the wider general public? And when will the
Government lead by example?
-
I refer the hon. Gentleman to the Prime Minister’s remarks
yesterday on “The Andrew Marr Show.” The Prime Minister was
absolutely explicit that she expects no repetition of any
of the remarks, comments or utterances that have been the
subject of considerable attention over the past week. Any
member of the board of the Office for Students who says
such things will no longer carry on in that position, and
that will be the position going forward.
-
Mrs (Basingstoke)
(Con)
What account did the independent appointment process take
of the public views of candidates, particularly when those
views might be so clearly at odds with the equality
principles that the Government clearly support?
-
Of course, the Office for Students is there to represent
all interests in our higher education system. The Higher
Education and Research Act 2017 puts an obligation on the
Secretary of State to have regard to a wide range of
factors in making such appointments, including that board
members must reflect the broad range of higher education
providers, those who experience higher education—the
students—and those, such as taxpayers and businesses, who
either pay for higher education or are on the receiving end
of its product in the flow of graduates into the workforce.
The Government are, of course, attentive to reactions to
appointments to the board, and we want the board to be
highly effective in delivering on the core duties of the
Office for Students.
-
rose—
-
(Manchester, Gorton)
(Lab)
rose—
-
Mr Speaker
I call .
-
Toby labelled Islam a “deeply misogynistic religion,” and
he referred to the choice of some Muslim women to adopt the
hijab as forced by male oppression. At a time when many
more young British Muslim women are entering higher
education, do the Government consider it appropriate to
appoint such a person to the Office for Students? What is
the likelihood that Toby Young will command the respect of
Muslim women in higher education who wear the hijab?
-
Mr Speaker
The hon. Member for Manchester Central (Lucy Powell) looked
almost inconsolable not to be called. It is true that I was
looking in her direction at an earlier stage and might very
well do so again, but it would be a pity to squander her at
too early a stage of our proceeding. I am saving her up.
-
In response to the question of the hon. Member for
Manchester, Gorton (Afzal Khan), and to many other
questions that might relate to individual tweets, articles
or comments made by Mr Young over a long period of time,
the answer is basically the same. Mr Young has
acknowledged, and the Government have recognised, that much
of what he said was foolish, wrong, offensive or obnoxious,
and it is right that he has apologised and expressed regret
for what he has said, written and done. It clearly does not
reflect the values of the Office for Students or of the
Government, but it is also important to recognise that,
since he made many of those remarks, he has continued to
make a valuable contribution to our education system, to
the work of the Fulbright Commission and to the network of
free schools across the country, and it is for that reason
that he has been appointed to the board of the Office for
Students.
-
Several hon. Members rose—
-
Mr Speaker
I welcome the hon. Member for Morley and Outwood on her
return from maternity leave, and let me say that it was a
pleasure to attend her wedding.
-
(Morley and Outwood)
(Con)
Thank you very much, Mr Speaker. It was good to have you at
the wedding. Labour Members feign outrage at Mr Young’s use
of social media, but perhaps they should look at the way
their own Labour activists and Momentum have treated other
candidates, including during the general election. I got
attacked by someone called “Corbyn Chick” for being an
unmarried mother—where are the family values there? Perhaps
Labour Members—[Interruption.] Perhaps if they listened
rather than shouted—[Interruption.] Perhaps they should
look at how their own Momentum activists and Labour party
activists treat other candidates on social media. Why the
hypocrisy?
-
My hon. Friend makes an important point about double
standards, because misogyny and misogynistic attitudes are
rampant on the Labour Benches, as has been acknowledged by
the hon. Member for Birmingham, Yardley (Jess Phillips),
who has described a persistent pattern of
“low-level non-violent misogyny”
at the top of the Labour party. It is important that Labour
Members—[Interruption.] That is what she said. It is
important that Labour Members do not apply double standards
when addressing this question. [Interruption.]
-
Mr Speaker
Order. I just say to the shadow Transport Secretary: sir,
if you were a motor car, you would go from 0 to 60 in about
five seconds. It is a discernible trait that I have
discerned in you over a period of years and I wish to help
you with this condition. Calm yourself. Just be a little
calmer. There are many, many hours to go and there are many
important developments to take place. Now, after due
patience having been exercised, I call .
-
(Manchester Central)
(Lab/Co-op)
Thank you very much, Mr Speaker.
Mr Young’s comments over the past few months and years
speak for themselves, and the Government are making a gross
misjudgement in now trying to defend them, but let us just
take a moment to look at his record, as the Minister is so
keen to talk to us about it. If he looked at the data
dashboard for the West London Free School, he would find
that progress 8 at that school is, in fact, average, and
that its percentage of children on the pupil premium is
below that for Hammersmith and Fulham and well below that
for inner London. Perhaps that is why the school has only
just got a “good” rating from Ofsted. I could give the
Minister the names of many, many more people with much more
experience, so is this not a case of “chumocracy”, as the
right hon. Member for Harlow (Robert Halfon) rightly said?
-
We have armchair critics who do not do half as much good as
Mr Young does for disadvantaged students in London and
across the country. The hon. Lady has questioned the record
of the West London Free School, but its GCSE results for
2016 put it in the top 10% of all English schools in the
country.
-
(Totnes) (Con)
I am afraid that I feel Mr Young’s comments do cross a line
and are indicative of an underlying character. We are
talking about the kind of person who would tweet comments
to a woman about masturbating over images of refugees—this
does just cross a line. I feel that he should withdraw.
When we apply for jobs, we all say whether or not there is
anything in our past that could cause embarrassment. If
that question was asked and it was answered “no”, there is
clearly a case for the board revisiting this and asking him
to step down.
-
I recognise that, as I have said, many of the tweets have
been obnoxious and repellent in many ways—obviously, I have
not seen all 40,000 of them—but it is also important to
recognise that that tweet was probably eight or nine years
old, since which time Mr Young has been on something of a
developmental journey. It is possible that there is a
capacity for reform, and we want to encourage Mr Young to
develop the best sides of his personality—those that have
led to him setting up good schools and to working with
disadvantaged children in London so that they can make the
most of their potential. It is for those reasons that he
has been appointed to the board.
-
(Ilford North)
(Lab)
There is a fault line in politics, with those who want a
modern democracy with people appointed on their merit
rather than their mates on one side, and I am surprised
that the Minister, who is meant to be a serious person,
finds himself on the other side.
I ask the Minister specifically about Mr Young’s comments
in the past two to three years, which the Select Committee
Chairman raised, and in which Mr Young advocated what he
called “progressive eugenics”—not in 2009, but in 2015. He
repeated that in November 2017. The comments were removed
by the Teach First website and he claimed that he had been
no-platformed and censored. Does that sound like someone
remorseful, who is suitable for public office? Why on earth
has the Minister done this, not only to his and the Prime
Minister’s credibility, but to that of the Office for
Students?
-
Mr Young’s work on behalf of disadvantaged and disabled
students speaks for itself. He has championed inclusion in
the educational institutions that he has set up. I cannot
speak for the content of specific articles or tweets
because, frankly, there are too many, and he has apologised
for any offence he has caused, but I think that we should
judge him by what he does—more so than we are currently
doing.
-
David T. C. Davies (Monmouth) (Con)
Will the Minister confirm that Toby Young has never used
social media to tweet bomb threats against rival
politicians, unlike one member of the Labour party, who is
named in the newspapers today, and that some of the outrage
is little more than an extension of the “no platform”
policy used to drive anyone with a right of centre view out
of the university sector?
-
My hon. Friend makes an important point, the same one that
was made a few moments ago, which is essentially that
double standards are being applied here. Opposition Members
should look at their use of social media—for example, the
appalling slurs on Conservative candidates that are
frequently levelled before a general election, and the
deception targeted at students about the Labour party’s
intentions on student fees and tuition debt. They should
consider their record on social media before criticising
others.
-
(Bath) (LD)
Does the Minister suggest that, simply because Mr Young,
under pressure, has now apologised for his dark and
dangerous comments, he no longer holds the views that he
has held for many years?
-
Mr Young has apologised, as the hon. Lady said. He has said
that he regrets the comments, which suggests that he has
moved on. He has also committed to not repeating those
comments and accepted the reality that if he does, he will
no longer be publicly appointed to the Office for Students
board.
-
Mr (Harwich and North
Essex) (Con)
The Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs
Committee oversees the public appointments process and we
hold the public appointments commissioner accountable for
the conduct of the code. This is a timely reminder that
public appointments are to be held accountable. Is my hon.
Friend satisfied that the panel had the due diligence they
should have had when they made their appointment? What
representations has he received from any member of the
panel about the appointment since it was made?
-
I thank my hon. Friend for his questions. The panel was
correctly composed. As I said earlier, it consisted of a
senior civil servant from the Department for Education, Sir
Michael Barber himself and an independent panel member.
They conducted the interview with Mr Young in the same
manner as they conducted interviews with other candidates
and found him appointable. In respect of due diligence, one
has to look at what is reasonable and proportionate for a
panel to do. Neither I nor the Department were aware of the
offensive tweets before the appointment was made, but there
is nothing unusual about that. Many of the remarks were
made years—in some cases, decades—ago and it is not
reasonable or proportionate for the Government to trawl
through tens of thousands of tweets over many years when
making public appointments.
-
(Crewe and Nantwich)
(Lab)
As a woman and as the mother of a young girl, I am appalled
that the Minister and the Prime Minister deem it suitable
to appoint such a man to this position. He has joked about
anal rape of women. He talks about women’s breasts
constantly on Twitter. Will the Minister not join me in
condemning this misogynistic view from someone who will be
in a position of power and show all those young girls who
look to the Government that it is simply not good enough?
-
I agree with the sentiments the hon. Lady has expressed.
Those comments and tweets are obviously obnoxious and
repellent, and that is why it is right that Mr Young has
apologised for them, it is right that he has expressed
regret for them and it is right that he has committed not
to repeat them at the risk of being immediately dismissed
from the Office for Students board.
-
(Torbay) (Con)
I have been interested to hear the Minister’s answers. Can
he reassure me about what evidence he took in relation to
Mr Young’s current appointment as a Fulbright commissioner
and what reassurances he has that some of the behaviour we
have discussed this afternoon will not be repeated?
-
Mr Young does important work on the Fulbright Commission.
He is a commissioner and has been reappointed to that role
as a result of the good work he has done. That carries on.
As I said earlier, Sir Nigel Sheinwald, the chair of the
Fulbright Commission, has described Mr Young as an
effective, committed and energetic commissioner and seen no
evidence that the historic remarks—going back many
years—have influenced him in discharging his duties
responsibly on behalf of disadvantaged young people. He
does very good work in promoting social mobility through
the Fulbright Commission’s work with the Sutton Trust and
other organisations.
-
(Walthamstow)
(Lab/Co-op)
The Minister asks us to judge Mr Young by what he does. As
one of the many women who have had personal, repeated and
recent experiences of his ability to lose friends and
alienate people, I say to the Minister that an
undergraduate student would know that it is not evidence
enough of a change in behaviour for someone simply—when
they have been caught out—to say sorry. Every educationist
would say to the Minister that rewarding bad behaviour, as
he is, sends a terrible message to our universities about
the standards we accept. What more does Mr Young have to
say before the Minister realises that he deserves to stay
on Twitter, not in teaching?
-
Since Mr Young made many of these comments and wrote these
articles—which, in most cases, predate 2010—he has been
appointed to the Fulbright Commission, he has been
reappointed to the Fulbright Commission, he has been made
director of a leading education charity and he has done
important work setting up schools in west London that are
delivering great outcomes for young people. That is what we
should judge him by, not foolish and obnoxious tweets from
the distant past.
-
Mr (Kettering)
(Con)
My constituents have no time for unpleasant and obscene
remarks, no matter who makes them. Will the Minister ensure
that all appointees to the board, including this one, have
as one of their first priorities a close examination of the
obscene levels of executive pay for some of the senior
personnel in the higher and further education sectors,
which many students regard as completely outrageous?
-
My hon. Friend makes a good point, and it is a priority for
the Office for Students to address the spiralling top-level
and vice chancellor pay in our institutions. It featured in
the regulatory framework consultation, which closed shortly
before Christmas, and will be prominent in the regulatory
framework when that is published later in the spring.
-
(Normanton, Pontefract
and Castleford) (Lab)
The problem is that this man thought it was okay to
publicly leer at women’s bodies while they were in the
workplace, including tweeting repeatedly about women, about
their knockers, their breasts, their boobs, their baps—on
and on. What does it say to women and young girls across
the country that a Minister is defending that—including
when this man attacked a woman MP in this House in that
way? Instead, why does not the Minister stand with women
across the world who are saying to men like this that their
time is up?
-
The Government have condemned the tweets. Mr Young has
apologised for them. Any repetition of language of that
kind will not be tolerated.
-
Mr (Middlesbrough South
and East Cleveland) (Con)
I suspect I am one of the few people in the Chamber who has
been to the West London Free School. I saw there for myself
the outstanding work that Toby and his team have delivered,
and they have done that blind to people’s background and
wealth, to the colour of their skin and to the creed that
they practice. Does the Minister agree that that record
deserves to be honoured and recognised? The comments were
wrong, but those deeds need to be respected and they give
Toby a credible platform for taking that office.
-
My hon. Friend is right to laud Mr Young’s achievements at
the West London Free School, where the 38.5% of children
who receive the pupil premium have done better than the
national average for pupils on the pupil premium in both
this most recent year and the previous one. Mr Young has
created an inclusive environment. A parent governor at the
school described him as
“committed to public education, academic excellence, and
greater opportunities for kids from lower incomes.”
-
Dr (Ealing Central and Acton)
(Lab)
I am usually the first to congratulate my constituents on
their achievements, but even Toby Young’s Acton address
cannot save him on this one. In his column in The Spectator
on 9 December—not historical, but mere days before his
appointment—he boasted
“what a Big Swinging Dick I am.”
The column was titled “The subtle art of showing off at
work”. How does that and the fact that his West London Free
School has gone through five headteachers in almost as many
years make him qualified for this post?
-
Had Opposition Members done half as much as Mr Young has to
promote outcomes for disadvantaged students, they would be
in a better position to disparage his achievements. Mr
Young’s school has done better than the national average
for its pupils on the pupil premium in both this most
recent year and the last. That is something of which he can
be rightly proud.
-
(Edinburgh South West)
(SNP)
The Minister is at pains to say that this appointment was
Nolan compliant. It is standard practice in modern times
for employers to look carefully at the social media profile
of those they appoint, particularly to public office. What
due diligence was carried out? Were those who appointed Mr
Young to the post aware of these obnoxious tweets? If so,
what was it about him that made him so uniquely qualified
for this post over those without such an obnoxious social
media profile?
-
As I have said, the competition through which Toby Young
was appointed was rigorous, open and fair. Like all the
interviews, his was conducted by a panel consisting of the
three people I have mentioned. It was an apolitical and
independent-minded board of panellists who deemed Toby
Young worthy of appointment.
-
(Garston and Halewood)
(Lab)
The Minister really is seeking to defend the indefensible.
As a former Minister for Disabled People, I am appalled at
some of Mr Young’s recently expressed views about the place
of disabled people in our society. The Minister has said
that many of Mr Young’s misogynistic tweets were from many
years ago, but his views about disabled people are very
recent indeed. How can the Minister appoint somebody who
thinks so little of the contribution of disabled people to
our society to such an important position? Does he not
agree that it is indefensible?
-
As I have already said, Mr Young has been a champion of the
inclusion of children with disabilities in mainstream
education. Not only that, but outside his work with
schools, he is a patron of the residential care home in
which lives his brother, who has learning disabilities of
his own.
-
Several hon. Members rose—
-
Mr Speaker
Order. I am looking to end these exchanges at quarter past
5, so Members need to be very brief.
-
(Heywood and Middleton)
(Lab)
The Ministers says that he condemns Toby’s Young’s past
comments, but the only appropriate condemnation would be to
remove him from the board of the Office for Students. Does
the Minister agree that a suitable replacement would be a
representative from the University and College Union, so
that university staff have a voice on the board?
-
No, that would not be appropriate. I take the same view
that the shadow Education Secretary took with respect to
the comments of the hon. Member for Sheffield, Hallam
(Jared O'Mara) when she said that he deserved a second
chance and that she was happy to sit alongside him because
the comments happened a long time ago. In her words,
“People do change their views... it is important that they
recognise that and apologise and correct that behaviour.”
That is what we are expecting Toby Young to do.
-
(Birmingham, Selly Oak)
(Lab)
If a Minister of the Crown were guilty of making these
filthy and obnoxious remarks, would the Minister expect him
to resign?
-
Going forward, the Nolan principles of public life will be
applicable to Toby Young. He will be holding a public
office, as a board member of the Office for Students. That
is why it has been made very clear to him and to other
board members of the Office for Students that if they make
these kinds of objectionable comments and remarks they will
be in breach of those principles and would not be able to
continue in their positions.
-
(Broxtowe) (Con)
I wonder whether the Minister can assist Members in this
way: does he think that the good people of Broxtowe are
more interested in the obnoxious tweets of somebody who
made those tweets many years ago but who nevertheless has
an important position than they are in learning about the
NHS crisis, which has affected almost everybody in this
country?
-
My right hon. Friend makes an important point. Labour’s
priorities are curious. We have had not a word from the
leadership of the party about what is going on in Iran, for
example, and it is focusing instead on its feigned outrage
over Toby Young. It should really focus on the priorities
facing this country, not these second order ones.
-
(Scunthorpe) (Lab)
The Minister said earlier that, in appointments to this
board, there was a desire to represent the broad range of
higher education providers. Why did he find space for such
a controversial appointment, but no space for somebody with
FE experience, when so many students are in further
education?
-
The board is representative of a broad range of higher
education providers, as it is required to be under the
terms of the Higher Education and Research Act 2017. It
contains a vice-chancellor of the University of the West of
England; a former vice-chancellor of BPP University; the
chair of council at an arts college, the Rose Bruford
College; and a senior figure from an Oxford college, who
happens to be the bursar and also a director at the Oxford
Centre for Higher Education Policy Studies. It is well
representative of the excellent diversity of our higher
education system.
-
(Dewsbury) (Lab)
May I gently remind the Minister that abuse comes to all
candidates, not just Conservative ones? I truly want to
believe that this House takes allegations of sexual
harassment and inappropriate behaviour in the workplace
seriously, but how can I when the Minister is continuing
with the appointment of this misogynist man who thinks that
it is appropriate constantly to tweet about women’s
breasts, anal rape and masturbating over images of starving
children?
-
I do not see why we should take lessons from the Labour
party on these matters. Let us take, for example, the case
of the shadow Chancellor, the right hon. Member for Hayes
and Harlington (John McDonnell), who made some
extraordinarily intemperate and misogynistic comments about
my right hon. Friend the Member for Tatton (Ms McVey). They
were too vile to repeat, but typical of what the hon.
Member for Birmingham, Yardley (Jess Phillips) described as
the persistent,
“low-level, non-violent misogyny”
at the top of the Labour party.
-
(Chesterfield) (Lab)
The Minister has really diminished himself over the course of
the past 45 minutes, and Toby Young is really not worth
ruining his own career for. Mr Young is someone who has
contempt for women, contempt for disabled people, and
contempt for people from deprived communities who have the
effrontery to try to get into Oxford. Will the Minister do
the decent thing and disown Mr Young, and see his own
reputation much enhanced for doing so?
-
We are going over much the same ground as in previous
questions. The tweets, remarks and comments that Mr Young has
made were clearly wrong. He is absolutely right to have
apologised for them. Since making many of those remarks, he
has continued to do good work in our educational system: he
is delivering good outcomes for disadvantaged pupils at his
schools in west London; and he is working hard on the
Fulbright Commission. We have every expectation that he will
make a valuable contribution to the work of the Office for
Students.
-
(Cardiff West)
(Lab)
I think the Minister said that Mr Young was deemed
appointable by the panel without knowledge of the information
on his past remarks that we have been hearing about. Were any
other candidates deemed appointable by the panel, but not
appointed? If that is the case, could this not be revisited
with a view to appointing someone who does not have these
kind of indecent views?
-
As I have already said, the appointment process followed by
the Office for Students board and panel was conducted in
accordance with the code of practice published by the Office
of the Commissioner for Public Appointments. Mr Young was
appointable—many people were interviewed, as this is an
important body—and it was determined that he had
characteristics that would enable him to acquit those
responsibilities well.
-
(Kingston upon Hull
North) (Lab)
It is quite clear from the Minister’s stumbling answers this
afternoon that due diligence was not carried out on the
appointment of this man. Does the fact that he deleted 50,000
tweets last week not worry the Minister? Does it not worry
the Minister that today he has told us about decades of
abusive and offensive comments made by this man? Surely this
is the time to revisit the decision to appoint him.
-
Mr Young’s online oeuvre is not a great loss to the world.
Personally speaking, I am glad we do not have to go through
it, and it is probably a good thing that it is lost to the
world. Mr Young wants to move forward and to focus on the
important contributions that he is making to the outcomes of
disadvantaged young people in west London and elsewhere in
the country. Digging up past tweets and other comments dating
back to the 1980s really serves very little productive
purpose.
|