A new report by the Education Policy Institute, in partnership with
UCL Institute of Education (IOE), examines how well
primary school pupils in England are performing compared to
those in top performing nations – with the findings represented,
for the very first time, in English measures of attainment.
English
Education: World Class
in Primary? converts countries’ results
from the international Trends in Mathematics and Science
Study (TIMSS) into equivalent English Key Stage 2 (KS2)
assessment results, producing an estimate of where England stands
in the world in primary education.
Key findings
England’s maths gap
There is a significant underperformance by low attaining
pupils:
- Our analysis shows that England has one of the
largest gaps between its high and low performers out of all
developed nations. England’s top performing maths
pupils achieve a very high standard but the bottom performers lag
far behind.
- Full details in figure 1.3 on page 16
- The tail of low performing pupils supports the case for
targeted support for vulnerable pupils throughout the course
of primary school and early years
education. If England is to be considered world
class at primary in maths, the performance of pupils at the
bottom must be improved.
Overall performance
England compares well with other developed nations
at primary level maths - but trails behind the top
performing nations:
- To match the performance of the top-performing nations, we
estimate 90 per cent of pupils would need to meet
the government’s expected
standard in Key Stage 2 maths by the end of primary
school.
-
In 2016, only 75 per cent of pupils met this
standard.
- This means that, in order to reach this
world-class benchmark of 90 per cent, an additional 90,000 pupils
would need to achieve the expected standard in England.
-
Northern Ireland performs better
in maths than England, with around 80 per cent of
pupils in Northern Ireland reaching a world-class standard.
Local and regional findings
When examining the performance of England’s regions and local
areas against the top performing countries, there are clear
disparities:
-
No local authorities in England reached the world-class
benchmark of 90 per cent of pupils meeting the
expected standard in primary level maths.
- 83 per cent of pupils met the expected standard in
highest performing Kensington and Chelsea.
- Only 60 per cent of pupils in lowest performing Bedford.
-
London dominates the top performers, with 17
of the 20 top performing local authorities in London.
- Combined with previous EPI secondary school analysis,
some areas in the North East perform reasonably well
at primary, but then decline rapidly by the end of
secondary.
- Redcar and Cleveland ranks 16th in
our primary table - but then falls to
122nd out of 150 authorities by the end of
secondary school.
-
Some areas in the East of England and the East and West
Midlands perform consistently poorly in both phases of
education.
Opportunity Areas
- The government’s 12 Opportunity Areas, considered the most
challenged on social mobility, show a wide range in performance -
spanning from 69 per cent of pupils in Blackpool, to 59 per cent
in Norwich.
- Overall, only 65 per cent of pupils in Opportunity Areas met
the expected standard. This poor performance against the world
class benchmark is unsurprising yet we find that there are many
other areas where performance is just as poor, or even
worse. The government should take these areas into
account when it creates new Opportunity Areas.
Commenting on the findings, Natalie Perera, Executive
Director and Head of Research at the Education Policy Institute,
said:
“Our new analysis shows that, overall, England performs
reasonably well at primary level compared to many other
developed nations – although we still have some way to go in
order to match the highest performing countries. The
biggest cause for concern, however, is the huge gulf between
England’s top performing primary pupils, and those
lagging behind at the bottom - one of the largest out of all
developed countries.
"If we want to match standards in some of
the world-leading nations and secure greater equity in our
education system, more must be done to raise the attainment of
our lowest, and often most vulnerable, pupils."