Zimbabwe 12.55 pm Kate Hoey (Vauxhall) (Lab)
(Urgent Question): Will the Foreign Secretary please make a
statement on the situation in Zimbabwe? The Secretary of State for
Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (Boris Johnson) In the early
hours of this morning, soldiers from the Zimbabwean army deployed
in central Harare, taking control...Request free trial
Zimbabwe
12.55 pm
-
(Vauxhall) (Lab)
(Urgent Question): Will the Foreign Secretary please make a
statement on the situation in Zimbabwe?
-
The Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs
(Boris Johnson)
In the early hours of this morning, soldiers from the
Zimbabwean army deployed in central Harare, taking control
of state television, surrounding Government ministries and
sealing off Robert Mugabe’s official and private
residences. At 1.26 am local time, a military officer
appeared on state television and declared that the army was
taking what he called “targeted action” against “criminals”
around Mugabe. Several Government Ministers, all of them
political allies of Grace Mugabe, are reported to have been
arrested. At 2.30 am, gunfire was heard in the northern
suburb of Harare where Mugabe has a private mansion. Areas
of the central business district have been sealed off by
armoured personnel carriers.
Our embassy in Harare has been monitoring the situation
carefully throughout the night, supported by staff in the
Foreign Office. About 20,000 Britons live in Zimbabwe, and
I can reassure the House that so far we have received no
reports of any British nationals being injured. We have
updated our travel advice to recommend that any Britons in
Harare should remain in their homes or other accommodation
until the situation becomes clearer. All our Zimbabwean and
UK-based embassy staff and their families are accounted
for.
I will say frankly to the House that we cannot tell how
developments in Zimbabwe will play out in the days ahead.
We do not know whether this marks the downfall of Mugabe or
not, and we call for calm and restraint. The events of the
last 24 hours are the latest escalation of months of brutal
infighting within the ruling ZANU-PF party, including the
sacking of a vice-president and the purging of his
followers, and the apparent positioning of Grace Mugabe as
a contender to replace her 93-year-old husband.
Hon. Members on both sides of the House have taken a deep
interest in Zimbabwe over many years, and I pay particular
tribute to the courage and persistence of my hon. Friend
the Member for Vauxhall (Kate Hoey)—I will call her my hon.
Friend—who has tirelessly exposed the crimes of the Mugabe
regime and visited the country herself during some of its
worst moments. The United Kingdom, under Governments of all
parties, has followed the same unwavering principles in its
approach to Zimbabwe. First and foremost, we will never
forget the strong ties of history and friendship with that
beautiful country, which has been accurately described as
the jewel of Africa.
All that Britain has ever wanted for Zimbabweans is for
them to be able to decide their own future in free and fair
elections. Mugabe’s consuming ambition has always been to
deny them that choice. The House will remember the brutal
litany of his 37 years in office: the elections that he
rigged and stole; the murder and torture of his opponents;
and the illegal seizure of land, which led to the worst
hyperinflation in recorded history—measured in billions of
percentage points—and forced the abolition of the
Zimbabwean dollar. All the while, his followers were
looting and plundering that richly endowed country, so that
Zimbabweans today are, per capita, poorer than they were in
1980. This has left many dependent on the healthcare,
education and food aid provided by the Department for
International Development.
Britain has always wanted the Zimbabwean people to be
masters of their fate, and for any political change to be
peaceful, lawful and constitutional. Authoritarian rule,
whether in Zimbabwe or anywhere else, should have no place
in Africa. There is only one rightful way for Zimbabwe to
achieve a legitimate Government, and that is through free
and fair elections held in accordance with the country’s
constitution. Elections are due to be held in the first
half of next year, and we will do all that we can, with our
international partners, to ensure that they provide a
genuine opportunity for all Zimbabweans to decide their
future. That is what we urge on all parties. I shall be
speaking to the deputy President of South Africa later
today.
Every Member will follow the scenes in Harare with good
will and sympathy for Zimbabwe’s long-suffering people, and
I undertake to keep the House updated as events unfold.
-
I thank the Foreign Secretary for his deep and passionate
response to what is a very fluid situation. This is clearly
a significant tipping point for the power balance in
Zimbabwe, and although it is not a coup in the sense that
the military want to run the country, it is a coup to
ensure that former Vice-President Emmerson Mnangagwa takes
over.
Does the Foreign Secretary agree that changing from one
ruthless leader to another ruthless leader will not help to
create the conditions that can lead to genuinely free and
fair elections in the coming year, and will not solve a
dire economic situation in which thousands of people are
destitute and food is scarce? Many people in Zimbabwe and
the international community will welcome the removal of the
Mugabes if that is the outcome, but does the Foreign
Secretary recognise that the former vice-president is
probably the one person in Zimbabwe who inspires even
greater terror than Mugabe, and that he was responsible for
the massacres of at least 20,000 people in Matabeleland
shortly after Mugabe took power in 1980? Does he recognise
that Mnangagwa, as head of Joint Operations Command, is
widely viewed to have co-ordinated ZANU-PF’s campaign of
torture, murder and repression in the lead-up to the rigged
run-off in the 2008 election?
Will the Foreign Secretary make clear that Her Majesty’s
Government’s policy on Zimbabwe will not change overnight,
and that we will not jump in to welcome Mnangagwa should he
take over right away? What more will the Government do to
help ensure that free and fair elections take place and to
give warm support to those who are struggling inside
Zimbabwe to raise the flag of true freedom? Will the
Foreign Secretary make representations to the African
Union, the Southern African Development Community and South
Africa to press ZANU-PF to allow genuinely free elections,
and not just to accept another strongman dictator?
Finally, will the Foreign Secretary recognise the
importance of listening to the voices of the huge
Zimbabwean diaspora here in the United Kingdom, many of
whom sought political asylum, but want nothing more than to
see their once prosperous country flourishing and free?
-
I renew my tribute to the campaigning of the hon. Lady. She
has been tireless over many, many years and has spoken
passionately, accurately and perceptively about this
subject, as she has again today.
It is too early to comment on the outcome of these events,
or to be sure exactly how things will unfold. The situation
is fluid, and I think it would be wrong for us at this
stage to comment specifically on any personalities that may
be involved, save perhaps to say that this is obviously not
a particularly promising development in the political
career of Robert Mugabe. The important point is that
we—including, I think, everyone in the House—want the
people of Zimbabwe to have a choice about their future
through free and fair elections. That is the consensus that
we are building up with our friends and partners, and I
shall be having a discussion with the vice-president of
South Africa to that effect later today.
-
(Tonbridge and Malling)
(Con)
I welcome the Foreign Secretary’s statement. Has he by any
chance asked our own military command to engage with the
chief of the general staff of the Zimbabwean armed forces,
and encourage him to put troops back into barracks and
allow a democratic process to take place?
-
We are certainly encouraging restraint on all sides. In
common with our international partners, we are urging all
sides in Harare to refrain from violence of any kind.
-
(Islington South and
Finsbury) (Lab)
Thank you for granting the urgent question, Mr Speaker, and
I thank my hon. Friend the Member for Vauxhall (Kate Hoey)
for securing it.
Events in Zimbabwe have moved incredibly quickly over the
last 48 hours. As recently as Monday, here in the Chamber,
I referred to the abuse of power by Grace Mugabe; two days
later, that power appears at the moment to have been taken
away, although the situation seems highly volatile.
Will the Foreign Secretary assure me that the 20,000
British nationals in Zimbabwe will be given all the
assistance that they need during this dangerous period? I
understand that in the past, at times of great tension,
there have been Cobra plans for British nationals to be
evacuated if necessary; I wonder whether thought will be
given to such a process on this occasion.
I hope the Foreign Secretary agrees with me that three key
points of principle apply to these events. First, a descent
into violence and reprisals from any direction in the
dispute must be avoided at all costs. Secondly, if all that
this represents in the long term is the replacement of
authoritarian rule on the part of one faction by
authoritarian rule on the part of another, that hardly
constitutes progress. Thirdly, we know that the only way
forward is for the Zimbabwean people to choose their own
Government and shape their own future through elections
that are free, fair, peaceful and democratic. Whatever
happens in the coming few days and weeks, let us keep that
ultimate goal in mind.
In September last year, Dr Alex Vines of Chatham House
published an excellent study of the scope for a peaceful
transition beyond Mugabe. He warned that western
Governments were too complacent about the status quo, and
had failed to create a dialogue with different factional
leaders and the kingmakers in the military. I shared Dr
Vines’s concerns with my parliamentary colleagues at the
time, and I am sure that the Foreign Secretary himself was
equally concerned. May I ask him what the Foreign Office
has done over the past year to establish a dialogue with Mr
Mnangagwa—or whichever of the factional leaders who will,
along with the military, now be in charge? We must all hope
for a more constructive relationship with them than we had
with Mr Mugabe, and we must urge them to take the correct
path towards democracy and peace.
-
I agree very much with what the right hon. Lady has said,
and I thought that her earlier remarks on the subject were
very commonsensical. She asked about British nationals in
Zimbabwe. As I said in my response to the urgent question,
there are about 20,000 of them. The FCO crisis centre has
been working overnight to ensure their welfare, and, to the
best of our knowledge, there have been no reports so far of
any injuries or suffering. I talked earlier to our head of
mission in Harare, who said that, as far as he understood,
UK nationals were staying where they were and avoiding
trouble, and I think that that is exactly the right thing
to do.
The right hon. Lady asked about our representation in
Harare, and about UK engagement with the political process
in Zimbabwe. All I can tell her is that most observers
would say that we have a more powerful representation in
Harare than in any other country. We have an excellent
ambassador and an excellent high commissioner, and we
engage at all levels in Zimbabwean politics. I think that
this is one of those occasions on which the right hon. Lady
and I are absolutely at one about what we want UK
representation to achieve: to encourage the people of
Zimbabwe on their path towards free and fair elections next
year.
-
Sir (Mid Sussex)
(Con)
I can confirm to the Foreign Secretary that we do indeed
have excellent diplomatic and aid staff in Harare.
If this does indeed presage a move towards easier times—and
I do, of course, accept the caution issued by the hon.
Member for Vauxhall (Kate Hoey)—will the Foreign Secretary
acknowledge, along with me, that the British Government
have unfinished business in Zimbabwe? Will he assure me
that they will offer further assistance, if they can, to
help that wonderful country and its remarkable people, both
black and white, in their transition to—we hope—a better
Government and a more prosperous state?
-
I thank my right hon. Friend, notably for his recent
mission to Zimbabwe. I was very interested to hear of his
meetings there. I know that he personally, in a way,
incarnates the historic ties between our two countries. He
knows whereof he speaks. Zimbabwe has fantastic potential.
It is a country with a very well-educated population, and
it has a great future if it can secure the right political
system. That is all it takes. They have fantastic natural
resources, and my right hon. Friend can be absolutely
reassured that the UK Government—who, as my right hon.
Friend the Prime Minister said just now, contribute about
£80 million or £90 million in DFID spending— will be
continuing to invest in Zimbabwe and its future.
-
Mr Speaker
Henceforth we shall all view the right hon. Member for Mid
Sussex (Sir Nicholas Soames) as an incarnation.
-
(North East Fife)
(SNP)
I thank the hon. Member for Vauxhall (Kate Hoey) for
raising this important issue.
Does the Foreign Secretary agree that democracy and respect
for human rights and the rule of law are the best way to
guarantee secure and sustainable development? Does he also
agree with me about the importance of the role that the NGO
sector will have to play in the future of Zimbabwe—and also
organisations such as the British Council, which does an
outstanding job across the world? What support does he
believe can be provided to them in the future? Finally,
what discussions has he had with his counterparts in the
region on today’s events?
-
The British Council will certainly be involved in the life
of Zimbabwe and giving its people the opportunities to
which they are entitled. In the last few hours I have been
concentrating mainly on liaising with our embassy in
Harare, but in the course of this afternoon I will be
talking to the South Africans, who play a crucial role in
the future of Zimbabwe, and who can be indispensable in
making sure it has free and fair elections next year.
-
(Rochford and
Southend East) (Con)
Although we have great fondness for the Minister for
Africa, may I congratulate the Foreign Secretary for
deciding to come to the Dispatch Box to update the House on
this important issue?
While it would be tempting to rush towards a Government of
national coalition to provide stability, will the Foreign
Secretary advise caution? We should see through the ZANU-PF
conference planned for December. Elections have been
planned for August, but there has already been talk about
bringing them forward to February and March. It is
important that those elections take place, that ZANU-PF
goes through a proper process, and that they are
multi-party elections, to make sure that there is the
stability required to move forward.
-
My hon. Friend brings a wealth of experience to this
subject, and he is absolutely right. The message I am
trying to get over to the House this afternoon is that we
should not jump the gun; we should not jump to conclusions
about exactly how things are going to turn out in the
course of the next few days, or even hours. My hon. Friend
is extremely sensible to urge caution.
-
(Wirral South)
(Lab)
Thank you for granting this urgent question, Mr Speaker.
My constituent Petronella Mahachi, originally from
Zimbabwe, came to see me only on Friday, and has asked me
to ask the Foreign Secretary about the forthcoming
elections. What practical steps will the UK be taking to
ensure that they are free and fair, especially in respect
of the participation of international bodies that can
guarantee the security and democracy of those elections?
-
Clearly, there is a great opportunity here for the
international community to come together, perhaps under
United Nations auspices, to ensure there are free and fair
elections. We will be making sure the UK Government are in
the lead, as we would expect, in ensuring that the people
of Zimbabwe have that opportunity.
-
Sir (North West
Norfolk) (Con)
Does the Foreign Secretary agree that this could be the
beginning of the end of one of the most flawed regimes the
world has ever seen? Does he also agree that the key
priority, as my hon. Friend the Member for Rochford and
Southend East (James Duddridge) has just pointed out, is
having a pathway to free and fair elections? Also, what is
going to be done to try to recover the many billions of
dollars stolen by Mugabe and his cronies?
-
The first priority is free and fair elections, and then to
get the Zimbabwean economy back on its feet so that the
great natural potential of that country can be unleashed.
That should, I am afraid, come before any attempt to take
back huge sums from a country that is already in the throes
of bankruptcy.
-
(Strangford) (DUP)
I thank the Secretary of State for his comments, and
commend the hon. Member for Vauxhall (Kate Hoey) on her
endeavours on behalf of the people of Zimbabwe in this
House during the time that I have been a Member—and before
then. Mugabe has expanded his bank accounts at the expense
of the citizens of Zimbabwe. He has left a trail of bloody
murder, broken hearts, empty bank accounts, stolen land,
poverty and a denial of citizens’ democracy and liberty.
What can be done to return the monies and the stolen lands
to those they were taken from?
-
I agree passionately with what the hon. Gentleman says
about the larceny and despoliation of farmers—white, black,
everybody—in that country. I saw it myself, as I am sure
many other hon. Members have: some 17 years or so ago, I
went to a place called Mazowe, not far from Harare, and saw
the ZANU-PF thugs terrify an elderly couple in their
homestead and then relentlessly seize their land. I am
afraid that couple are now no longer with us; they passed
away, as, sadly, is the case with many other farmers in
that country. There is no easy way to make restitution for
their loss and suffering. The important thing is to
concentrate on the future of Zimbabwe, which has incredible
economic potential. Get it back on its feet and invest in
the country; that is the best way forward for Zimbabwe.
-
Mrs (Mid Derbyshire)
(Con)
Has the Foreign Secretary had, or does he plan to have,
talks with the Secretary of State for International
Development about how we can stop the humanitarian crisis
in Zimbabwe getting worse?
-
The UK, in the year to March I believe, supplied £80
million or £90 million and has helped educate possibly
80,000 children and supplied sanitation for 1.4 million
people. We are in the lead in trying to help the
Zimbabweans and in alleviating the humanitarian crisis they
face as a result of the economic mismanagement in that
country. The caution my hon. Friend the Member for Rochford
and Southend East (James Duddridge) urges is absolutely
right as it is too early to say whether there is an
opportunity in this situation, but if there is, DFID and
all the organs of UK foreign and overseas policy—of global
Britain—will be there to serve.
-
(East Dunbartonshire)
(LD)
This is clearly a developing and concerning situation in a
country that is already beset by human rights abuses and
economic turmoil as a result of Mugabe’s tyrannous reign,
but Zimbabwe is approaching a crossroads, and it could
continue down its disastrous path with new faces at the
top. What steps does the Foreign Secretary think need to be
taken for the pressure to transition to turn into an
opportunity for Zimbabwe to embrace a positive democratic
future?
-
The timetable has been well spelled out by my hon. Friend
the Member for Rochford and Southend East (James
Duddridge). We need to go forward now with the ZANU-PF
conference and then the elections scheduled for next year.
It is crucial that they should now go ahead and be free and
fair. At this stage, it would not be right for us to
speculate about personalities; what matters is that the
people of Zimbabwe have a free and democratic choice.
-
Mr (North West
Cambridgeshire) (Con)
I appreciate that events are very fast-moving, but will the
British Government work closely with the African Union to
try to get it to put pressure on Zimbabwe, both not to
continue as an authoritarian state and to respect human
rights, particularly of those from overseas, such as from
Britain?
-
I thank my hon. Friend for that excellent point. The AU is
an increasingly important and valuable interlocutor in
Africa, and I have a good relationship with Mr Faki,
president of the commission. I will be going to the AU
summit in Abidjan in Côte d’Ivoire next week, and I have no
doubt that Zimbabwe will be top of the AU agenda in Côte
d’Ivoire.
-
(Hornsey and Wood
Green) (Lab)
Constituents have been in touch with me this morning
regarding the worrying situation in Harare. What
reassurances can the Foreign Secretary give that the
Foreign Office will continue with its excellent start at
communicating with residents in the UK who are terribly
worried about what is happening in Zimbabwe?
-
I say to the 20,000 UK nationals in Zimbabwe and to the
200,000 Zimbabweans here in the UK that, as far as we know,
no one is under any threat at the present time. The
important advice that we continue to give to those in
Zimbabwe is to stay in their homes wherever they are and
not go out on to the street—do not get into any trouble. To
the best of our knowledge, there have been no reports of
any suffering or any violence against UK nationals in
Zimbabwe.
-
(Beckenham)
(Con)
I recall the 21 December 1979 Lancaster House conference
and the British military and civilian involvement in
setting up the regime in Zimbabwe. We actually established
Mugabe in power. Will we consider using military and
civilian assets to help any kind of election? Hopefully,
this time, we will get it right.
-
I admire my hon. Friend’s spirit. I have no doubt that we
could do such a thing if we needed to, but a better option
would be to work with the Southern African Development
Community and the African Union under a UN framework to
ensure that we deliver free and fair elections. That is
probably better at this stage.
-
(Glasgow North)
(SNP)
There are reports that Grace Mugabe is out of the
country—possibly in Namibia. Building on the important role
that regional organisations such as SADC and the AU have to
play and on the roles of the Foreign Office and DFID, what
steps can the Foreign Secretary take to ensure that any
possible instability in Zimbabwe does not spread to the
wider region?
-
That is an acute question. As so often in matters of
Zimbabwean politics, the answer lies very much with our
friends in South Africa, and it is to them that we will be
turning first.
-
(Torbay) (Con)
Most of us would see the outcomes for Zimbabwe of Robert
Mugabe’s disastrous rule as heartbreaking, and it is clear
that future decisions about who governs the country must be
taken by ballots, not bullets and military coups. What
discussions will the Foreign Secretary have with the
Secretary of State for International Development about
building Zimbabwe into a democratic and prosperous country?
-
DFID will certainly want to support the transition, and I
hope that it will be a transition to a free and democratic
country. The people of Zimbabwe have suffered for too long,
and it is fascinating to see quite how many Members want to
ask questions on this subject, about which the British
people really care. For many people, this is a moment of
hope, but it is too early to be sure that that hope will be
fulfilled, so we need to work hard now to ensure that there
are free and democratic elections next year.
-
(Coatbridge, Chryston
and Bellshill) (Lab)
I thank the Foreign Secretary for taking this urgent
question from my hon. Friend the Member for Vauxhall (Kate
Hoey). For far too long, the British Government have been
unwilling to speak out against the political events in
Zimbabwe, and I hope that that will change in the coming
months and years. The Foreign Secretary has already
mentioned the British people with families in Zimbabwe, and
I have a member of staff who is from Zimbabwe and his
family are rightly worried about what the future holds.
Will the Foreign Secretary confirm that he will keep the
House updated? There is no need to for him be dragged along
here to tell us what is happening; just keep the House up
to date and make sure that we play a proper role in
ensuring a stable and democratic future for all the people
of Zimbabwe.
-
I am more than happy to give that undertaking. If the hon.
Gentleman will write to me with the details of that case, I
will see what we can do to help.
-
(South West
Wiltshire) (Con)
The British military have long been a force for good in
inculcating recognisable values, an ethos and the law of
armed conflict into militaries throughout southern and east
Africa, including Zimbabwe. What British military assets
are currently engaged in security sector reform in
Zimbabwe? What does the Foreign Secretary envisage for the
future?
-
To the best of my knowledge, I do not think that we are
engaged in that way in Zimbabwe for historical reasons that
I am sure my hon. Friend will understand. If we can achieve
the reform that we want and if Zimbabwe goes down the path
that is now potentially open to it, that is not to say that
the UK could not in the future be engaged in exactly that
kind of assistance.
-
(Glasgow East)
(SNP)
I am grateful to my colleague from the all-party
parliamentary group on Zimbabwe for securing this urgent
question. I share the view that Zimbabwe cannot move from
having a despot in charge to having a bampot in charge, and
I hope that we can see early free and fair elections.
What discussions has the Foreign Secretary had with the
Home Secretary regarding Zimbabwean nationals who may be
due for return to Zimbabwe? There is clearly a volatile
environment in Zimbabwe at the moment, so it is important
that he has that conversation with the Home Secretary.
-
As constituency MPs, I am sure that many of us have met
Zimbabweans who are in exactly that situation. If the hon.
Gentleman has any particular cases that he wants to raise,
I would be happy to pass them on.
-
(South Thanet)
(Con)
Many people in the UK and, indeed, in this House will have
friends and family either currently living in or with close
links to Zimbabwe, and the hon. Member for Vauxhall (Kate
Hoey) referred to the diaspora. Will the Foreign Secretary
assure me that the UK, working with our international
partners, will be at the forefront of seeking a democratic
and prosperous future for Zimbabwe? We should seize this
opportunity as one that does not come around too often; it
is a chance for us to make a difference.
-
Absolutely. That is the key point. This is potentially a
moment of hope, and many people in this country will be
looking at it in that way. We must ensure that we do not
jump the gun and that we are not premature, which is why I
have been cautious with the House today. However, my hon.
Friend can be absolutely certain that if our hopes are
fulfilled, the UK will be at the forefront of helping to
turn Zimbabwe around.
-
Mr (Glasgow North East)
(Lab/Co-op)
If there is to be a transition, I share the Foreign
Secretary’s hope that it will be peaceful. Does he know
whether the opposition parties have had any involvement in
recent hours, or if there is capacity for the opposition
parties to be involved in any transitional arrangements? Or
is it too early to say?
-
I am not aware of Morgan Tsvangirai or other opposition
figures being involved in what is going on, but the
opportunity is there in free and fair elections for them to
put their case to the Zimbabwean people. That is what we
want to see.
-
(Stirling) (Con)
What can be done in practical terms at this point to
encourage the restoration of democracy in Zimbabwe in the
form of free and fair elections?
-
The answer is simple. We can work with our friends and
partners, with the African Union and with SADC to get their
agreement, which I am sure will be readily forthcoming,
that the best future for the prosperity of the people of
Zimbabwe is to have free and fair elections. That is the
way to unlock the wealth and prosperity of the country.
-
(Corby) (Con)
What early discussions has my right hon. Friend had with
African leaders on these latest developments?
-
I am grateful for that question. I am fixed to talk to the
vice-president of South Africa at the earliest possible
opportunity, but I must regretfully inform the House that I
have not had much time to talk to any others. As I said to
the hon. Member for North East Fife (Stephen Gethins), the
South Africans will be crucial in this.
-
(Tiverton and Honiton)
(Con)
I was an election observer in Zimbabwe in 2000, when Mugabe
stole the election from the Movement for Democratic Change
through persecution and brutality, and for my sins I have
been banned from Zimbabwe.
Not only have the farms of black and white farmers been
destroyed in Zimbabwe, but corporate governance across the
piece has been destroyed. There will be a stage when we
need to re-engage to rebuild that country, because Zimbabwe
should be feeding most of Africa; it cannot even feed
itself now. There will be a time to engage, but it probably
is not yet. We have to be ready to get in there and put the
situation right, because Zimbabwe is a beautiful country
with lovely people, and it has been absolutely destroyed by
a madman.
-
I am delighted that my hon. Friend has been to Zimbabwe,
and he is right in his analysis of what went wrong. I
remember seeing how fantastic farms were ruined, with
irrigation systems melted down to make saucepans, or
whatever. It was an economic catastrophe, for which the
people of Zimbabwe are now paying.
The best way forward is through free and fair elections. As
my hon. Friend has experience as an election monitor in
Zimbabwe, I wonder whether it is too much to hope that he
might volunteer to go back next year to monitor the free
and fair elections we hope to see.
-
(Gillingham and
Rainham) (Con)
I have read the Foreign Secretary’s excellent book on
Winston Churchill, and he will be familiar with the great
words of our great former Prime Minister:
“Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all
the others.”
The Foreign Secretary is committed to seeing Zimbabwe back
as a democratic state. Zimbabwe was suspended from the
Commonwealth in 2002, and it withdrew from the Commonwealth
in 2003. As Zimbabwe goes back to being a democratic state,
it would be great to see it become part of the Commonwealth
again.
-
Would it not be wonderful to see Zimbabwe as part of the
Commonwealth again? It would be an absolutely wonderful
thing, and that is what we should work for. My hon. Friend
sets an important and noble ambition for our country.
-
(Aberdeen South)
(Con)
Will the Secretary of State confirm the UK’s commitment to
the people of Zimbabwe and to ensuring that their future is
strong and prosperous? Zimbabwe is a former member of the
Commonwealth, so does he have any intention of speaking to
other Commonwealth leaders about exerting their influence
and support to help us to ensure that reality for Zimbabwe?
-
The Commonwealth, along with the other multinational,
multilateral institutions I have mentioned, can play an
important role in encouraging Zimbabwe on that path. We
have a wonderful Commonwealth summit coming up in April
2018, as my hon. Friend will know. April might be too early
to welcome Zimbabwe back into the Commonwealth, but the
summit may be a useful moment to bring Commonwealth nations
together to exhort Zimbabwe to set Commonwealth membership
as a target.
-
(Witney) (Con)
Zimbabwe a National Emergency—ZANE—is a wonderful charity
based in Witney that provides much-needed care to the
people of Zimbabwe. Will my right hon. Friend please
confirm that he will have any discussions necessary with
the charitable sector to ensure that, during this period of
political instability, much-needed aid still gets through?
-
Mr Speaker
The charity is run by Tom Benyon, a splendid fellow and a
former constituent of mine. He is a very fine man.
-
And a former Member of Parliament.
-
Mr Speaker
Indeed, as the hon. Gentleman pertinently observes.
-
I have had the good fortune to meet representatives of ZANE
over the years, as I am sure have many hon. Members on both
sides of the House. ZANE does fantastic work, in common with
other voluntary organisations that have kept the flame of
hope alive for 37 years. Now is the moment when there really
could be a new dawn. There is an opportunity and a moment of
hope. We must not overdo it, but we must foster and
sedulously protect what could be a real opportunity for the
people of Zimbabwe.
-
(West Aberdeenshire and
Kincardine) (Con)
As my right hon. Friend and others have said, events in
Zimbabwe are very much in flux. Events are fast-moving, and
we do not quite know how they will end. Will he confirm that
the United Kingdom sees the future of Zimbabwe as a
prosperous country playing an active role in the region? Does
he agree that, if we are seeing the end of Mugabe’s rule,
that is a much more realistic prospect and something about
which we can be very hopeful?
-
I am worried that in my last answer I slightly overdid the
note of hope, because hopes have been disappointed so many
times, but there is hope. There is now a real chance that
things will change in Zimbabwe, but it is by no means a
foregone conclusion. Everybody will have to work hard
together to achieve it, and there will have to be free and
fair elections. Nobody on either side of the House wants to
see simply the transition of one unelected tyrant to another.
No one wants to see that; we want to see proper, free and
fair elections next year, and that is what we will be working
towards.
-
The Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office
(Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon) (Con)
My Lords, with the permission of the House, I will
repeat the Answer given by my right honourable friend
the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth
Affairs to an Urgent Question in another place on the
current situation in Zimbabwe:
“In the early hours of this morning, soldiers from the
Zimbabwean army deployed in central Harare, taking
control of state television, surrounding government
ministries and sealing off Robert Mugabe’s official and
private residences. At 1.26 am local time, a military
officer appeared on state television and declared that
the army was taking what he called ‘targeted action’
against the ‘criminals’ around Mugabe. Several
government Ministers, all of them political allies of
Grace Mugabe, are reported to have been arrested. At
2.30 am, gunfire was heard in the northern suburb of
Harare where Mugabe has a private mansion. Areas of the
central business district have been sealed off by
armoured personnel carriers.
Our embassy in Harare has been monitoring the situation
carefully throughout the night, supported by staff in
the Foreign Office. About 20,000 Britons live in
Zimbabwe and I can reassure the House that so far we
have received no reports of any British nationals being
injured. We have updated our travel advice to recommend
that any Britons in Harare should remain in their homes
or other accommodation until the situation becomes
clearer. All our Zimbabwean and UK-based embassy staff
and their families are accounted for. I will say
frankly to the House that we cannot tell how
developments in Zimbabwe will play out in the days
ahead, and we do not know whether this marks the
downfall of Mugabe or not. We call for calm and
restraint.
The events of the past 24 hours are the latest
escalation of months of brutal infighting within the
ruling ZANU-PF party, including the sacking of a
vice-president and the purging of his followers, and
the apparent positioning of Grace Mugabe as a contender
to replace her 93 year-old husband.
Honourable Members on all sides of the House have taken
a deep interest in Zimbabwe over many years, and I pay
particular tribute to the courage and persistence of my
friend—and I can say that—the honourable Member for
Vauxhall, who has tirelessly exposed the crimes of the
Mugabe regime, visiting the country herself during some
of its worst moments. This country, under Governments
of all parties, has followed the same unwavering
principles in its approach to Zimbabwe. First and
foremost, we will never forget the strong ties of
history and friendship with that beautiful country,
accurately described as the jewel of Africa.
All that Britain has ever wanted for Zimbabweans is for
them to be able to decide their own future in free and
fair elections. Mugabe’s consuming ambition was always
to deny them that choice. The House will remember the
brutal litany of his 37 years in office: the elections
that he rigged and stole; the murder and torture of his
opponents; and the illegal seizure of land, leading to
the worst hyperinflation in recorded history—measured
in billions of percentage points—and forcing the
abolition of the Zimbabwean dollar. All the while, his
followers were looting and plundering that richly
endowed country, so that Zimbabweans today are, per
capita, poorer than they were in 1980, leaving many
dependent on the healthcare, education and food aid
provided by DfID.
Britain has always wanted the Zimbabwean people to be
masters of their fate and for any political change to
be peaceful, lawful and constitutional. Authoritarian
rule, whether in Zimbabwe or anywhere else, should have
no place in Africa. There is only one rightful way for
Zimbabwe to achieve a legitimate Government, and that
is through free and fair elections held in accordance
with the country’s constitution. Elections are due to
be held in the first half of next year, and we will do
all that we can with our international partners to
ensure that they provide a genuine opportunity for all
Zimbabweans to decide their future. That is what we
shall urge on all parties, and I will speak to the
Deputy President of South Africa later today.
Every honourable Member will follow the scenes in
Harare with good will and sympathy for Zimbabwe’s
long-suffering people, and I undertake to keep the
House updated as events unfold”.
3.42 pm
-
(Lab)
My Lords, I thank the Minister for repeating as a
Statement the Answer to the Urgent Question, and I of
course wholeheartedly support the actions of the
Government: protection of all civilians, including the
20,000 British citizens, is obviously the first
priority. I see that recent press reports say that a
delegation from South Africa was refused entry into
Zimbabwe. Can the Minister tell us a little more about
the contacts with not only South Africa but the African
Union on the ongoing situation and the need to protect
civilians? Can he further tell us that there will be
discussions to ensure that the whole of the African
Union will ensure that the elections scheduled for next
year will be free and fair, and open to all people in
Zimbabwe to participate in?
-
First and foremost, I thank the noble Lord for his
support for the Government, which reflects the
continuing position of Her Majesty’s Opposition on this
important issue. On delegates from South Africa being
refused entry, I am aware of various media reports. I
cannot give him a factual answer, but I will certainly
follow that up. As I said in repeating the Answer, my
right honourable friend the Foreign Secretary will be
speaking to the Deputy President of South Africa. We
will get an update and I will update the noble Lord and
the whole House accordingly.
The noble Lord makes a valid point about the African
Union. In that regard, my right honourable friend the
Foreign Secretary is due to travel to the next meeting
of the African Union—in Ivory Coast, I believe —which
takes place the week after next. Events may move
on—they are very fluid on the ground—but I am sure
that, in the conversation and discussion that takes
place in the interim and at that meeting, Zimbabwe will
be a priority issue.
-
(LD)
My Lords, I, too, confirm our support for the
Government’s efforts in this regard. This morning, the
Movement for Democratic Change Senator David Coltart
said that the military has complete control over the
media, and that
“this has all the marks of a coup”.
The MDC is committed to respecting the constitution and
is against its breach. Do the Minister and his
colleagues support its call for the military to restore
order as soon as possible and, if the need arises, for
the impeachment of Robert Mugabe?
What assessment has been made of the potential impact
of the military takeover on our ongoing commitments in
Zimbabwe, which are varied and deep? Has the Minister
spoken to his counterpart in DfID about this yet?
-
First, as I have already said, the situation is
unfolding and fluid, so we are unclear how things are
on the ground. I welcome the noble Lord’s support, and
that of his party, on this important issue.
In terms of what happens hereafter, I am also aware of
contacts made between the South African Government and
Robert Mugabe, and reports on that are coming through.
Our primary objective is to ensure that all British
citizens are safe and know how and where to make
contact. Communications remain open with our embassy on
the ground and we are in contact with the ambassador.
What happens in the next few hours, tomorrow and in the
following days is all very much to be determined.
However, we will of course work with not just DfID
partners but all departments across Her Majesty’s
Government and, as I have indicated, allies and
supporters in neighbouring countries, particularly
South Africa, to ensure stability in the country. I am
sure that I speak for everyone in the House when I say
that we are calling not just for restraint but for law
and order to retain a semblance. We have seen that
there is peace at the moment, and hope that that
prevails. No matter what their sentiment, we call on
all citizens of Zimbabwe to continue in that respect.
-
The Lord Bishop of Southwark
My Lords, the Minister is only too aware both of the
United Kingdom’s historic links with Zimbabwe and of
the difficult relationship with ZANU-PF; that is
reflected in the Statement, which has won support
around the House. Speaking as chair of the most
reverend Primate the ’s
Zimbabwe round table, I pass on the concern of Anglican
bishops in Zimbabwe that any transition should not be
allowed to lead to a reoccurrence of conflict in a
country that has suffered much. I ask that the UK
offers help sensitively and purposefully where it is
possible to do so, supporting key stakeholders who are
committed to a peaceful transition and who are prepared
for it.
-
I thank the right reverend Prelate. Let me assure him
that, of course, we welcome input and insight into the
situation on the ground. He raises the issue of the
important role of Church leaders in Zimbabwe, which will
be an important element in ensuring the peace and
security that we all wish to be sustained in Zimbabwe.
The role of the Church in that regard will be crucial.
-
of Bletso
(CB)
My Lords, I welcome the Statement and the arrests of the
G40 hierarchy, which I hope will herald a new dawn and a
new chapter for Zimbabwe in building confidence in the
country. Is the Minister aware that the most likely
immediate scenario is that Emmerson Mnangagwa will become
the interim President for the next 90 days and, at the
electoral college scheduled for next month, a Government
of national unity will be formed with Morgan Tsvangirai
as the Prime Minister? While we all call for free and
fair elections as soon as possible, is the Minister aware
that the most likely situation is that elections will be
delayed for a couple of years until economic security and
stability is restored in the country?
-
The noble Lord will appreciate that I will not speculate
on who may or may not lead Zimbabwe. It is a fact that
Emmerson Mnangagwa, to whom he referred, was removed as
Vice-President by Robert Mugabe and the current
Administration. As to what happens thereafter, we expect,
hope and desire first and foremost that peace and
stability prevails. Of course, there is a constitution to
be respected. It would be premature for me to speculate
on any delays in elections scheduled for next year, or
indeed on whoever in the coming days will be at the helm
of government in Zimbabwe.
-
(Con)
My Lords, I thank the Minister for his answer to the
previous question. It would be premature to welcome any
change of Government, because we do not know what form
that Government will take. I speak as a former resident
of the country. I ask him to ensure that, when
consideration is given to what may happen in the coming
months and years, we recognise that there are several
hundred thousand Zimbabweans resident in South Africa and
in other countries around Zimbabwe. Therefore, any
instability that occurs in Zimbabwe may have serious
implications for the other countries in that part of the
continent.
-
I thank my noble friend, who speaks very aptly. We have
always been concerned about the situation in Zimbabwe and
its impact on the surrounding regions. I alluded to this
in the Statement but, irrespective of which party has led
the Government and notwithstanding the situation on the
ground in Zimbabwe, we have stood firm and side by side
with the people of Zimbabwe. We have seen from recent
economic conditions on the ground and in the situation
under Robert Mugabe’s leadership that the people have
suffered dreadfully. However, at the same time, the
British Government, irrespective of political colour,
have stood resolute in supporting Zimbabwe’s citizens. We
continue to provide £80 million per annum in bilateral
support, in crucial areas such as education and health,
and it is important that that support has continued
irrespective of who has led Zimbabwe.
-
(Lab)
My Lords, in welcoming the Minister’s Statement, can I
gently correct him? South Africa is the jewel of
Africa—not Zimbabwe. More seriously, could he investigate
why the fearlessly investigative online newspaper the
Daily Maverick had its chief reporter in Zimbabwe,
Richard Poplak, detained and then put on a plane out of
Harare? Is there now an even greater attack on press
freedom in Zimbabwe? Could he investigate that, because
it is a worrying development? Given the instability, we
need journalists in there to tell us the truth.
-
On the second point, I shall write to the noble Lord as
appropriate. On his first point, there are many jewels in
Africa, and that is probably where I shall let the matter
rest.
-
(Con)
The danger of these sorts of discussions is that the
impression is given that we have responsibility for what
happens in Zimbabwe. Obviously, we have some
responsibility for the 20,000 or so British citizens who
are there—but do we have the capability to rescue them if
necessary?
-
Our first priority is our own citizens, and I have
already alluded to the fact that we have made sure that
we are in communication with them and retain that. We
have given them advice to stay in their homes, because
that is important; we do not know what the prevailing
situation will be. In our general responsibility not just
to Zimbabwe but across the world, it is right that
Britain as a country, with regard to both our history and
our current positioning, remains engaged and involved,
whether through our support through DfID or other
political and humanitarian support. That shows that we
are a responsible Government on the international stage;
I strongly believe that, and long may it continue.
|