The Government will struggle to take control of immigration
post-Brexit if it continues to use the woefully inadequate
migration data it currently relies on.
These data do not provide an accurate number of migrants entering
or leaving the country or the number of migrants in work. It is
also not clear how long migrants stay in the UK.
This is one of the main findings of the Brexit and the
Labour Market report published today by House of Lords
Economics Affairs Committee.
Commenting on the report, , Economic
Affairs Committee Chairman, said:
“The Government must have reliable statistics on migration before
it formulates new policy, otherwise it will be making crucial
decisions - of vital importance to the country's businesses - in
the dark.
“It will take companies time to adapt their business models to be
less dependent on EU workers and an implementation period is
essential to ensure a smooth transition.
“Businesses will have to accept that immigration from the
European Union is going to reduce and adapt accordingly. Some
firms will need to raise wages to attract domestic workers. In
other sectors, where migrant workers may not easily be replaced
by domestic workers, firms will need to change their business
models or increase capital investment in automated processes. All
these options may lead to higher prices for consumers.
“The Committee’s 2008 report on immigration warned that the
employment of migrant workers could lead to businesses neglecting
skills and training for British workers. As the recruitment and
retention problem in the nursing sector highlights, these fears
have been realised and training for the domestic workforce needs
urgently to be given a higher priority.”
In order to address the problem with the migration data the
Committee recommends the Government should:
- Use information relating to the economic activity of
immigrants – such as paying tax or receiving benefits – to gain a
clearer understanding of how long migrants stay in the UK.
- Explore how information from exit checks, which have been
reintroduced, can be combined with other information. This should
help to address the unreliability of the International Passenger
Survey (IPS).
- Devise a better way of accounting for the departure of
international students. The current approach cannot calculate,
with any precision, how many students stay at the end of their
degree. The IPS suggests a significantly higher number of
students remain in the UK than other sources of information (such
as visa data).
Other findings and recommendations from the report include:
- The Government is committed in the long term to reducing net
migration to the tens of thousands. Using a strict annual
numerical target runs the risk of causing disruption to
businesses and the economy. Reducing net migration is likely to
be best achieved by a flexible approach which can adapt to the
needs of businesses and the labour market, in particular during
any implementation period.
- An implementation period when EU workers can be employed
easily is particularly important for sectors with a high turnover
of staff, such as social care and nursing. It will also be
necessary if the Government is to achieve some of its other
policy aims, such as building sufficient numbers of new homes or
boosting investment in infrastructure, given the current
shortages in the construction industry.
- Once the Government has improved figures on the number of
students who leave the UK at the end of their studies, it should
no longer include students in any short-term net migration
figures for public policy purposes.