HMP/YOI Feltham was not safe enough, violence had risen and boys
and young men spent too long locked in their cells, said Peter
Clarke, Chief Inspector of Prisons. There were, however, many
examples of good work by staff, he added. Today he published two
reports of unannounced inspections of the West
London young offender institution.
HMP/YOI Feltham is divided into two parts. Feltham A holds boys
aged 15 to 18 and held 126 boys at the time of the inspection.
Feltham B holds young adults aged 18 to 21 and was holding 380 at
the time of the inspection. Both sites are managed as a whole but
operate separately. Both sites were recently inspected. Feltham A
was previously inspected in August 2015 and Feltham B in July
2014. At this more recent inspection, Feltham A had seen a
decline in standards and received inspectors’ lowest judgement
for safety and the provision of work, training and
education.
At Feltham A, inspectors were concerned to find that:
- levels of violence and the use of force had increased and
some of the violence was very serious, including multiple
assailants and the use of weapons;
- the response in terms of behaviour management was
ineffective, with a focus on sanctions and regime
restrictions;
- time out of cell was inadequate and prevented boys from using
basic amenities, including showers and telephones;
- the restricted regime meant 40% of the boys were locked up
during the school day while 30% were out of their cells for just
two hours each day; and
- there were sufficient school places and teachers but fewer
than half the boys were getting to classes.
However, inspectors at Feltham A were pleased to find that:
- staff were working in very challenging circumstances yet most
interactions between staff and boys were polite;
- care for boys in crisis or at risk of self-harm was
reasonably good;
- substance misuse services remained good;
- health care was good and the work of the mental health team
was excellent;
- despite problems caused by the regime, the education provider
had created a positive school ethos with high expectations of
boys; and
- provision to resettle boys back into the community was
reasonably good and preparation for release or for transition to
the adult estate was well managed.
The inspection of Feltham B, after a more optimistic inspection
in July 2014, was also disappointing. Despite some good work
being carried out by staff across many areas of the prison,
inspectors found that the young men held there were living in an
unsafe environment, were often afraid for their own safety and
were enduring a regime that was unsuitable for prisoners of any
age, let alone young men.
Inspectors were concerned to find that:
- reception and first night environments did not help make new
arrivals feel safe;
- there had been a significant increase in violence against
prisoners and staff since the last inspection and nearly half of
the prisoners said they had felt unsafe at Feltham;
- the response to violence had been ineffective and there did
not appear to be a coherent plan to address behaviour management
in a different way;
- the strategy for dealing with gang-related issues was largely
ineffective;
- numerous restrictions and staffing shortfalls affected the
provision of a full regime for most prisoners;
- some young men were locked in their cells for more than 22
hours a day;
- too many work and education programmes were cancelled or
restricted by the regime and overall, the quality of learning and
skills provision needed to improve; and
- too many prisoners arrived without an up-to-date risk
assessment and sentence planning was not working
effectively.
However, inspectors were pleased to that at Feltham B:
- staff-prisoner relationships were generally good;
- health care was good and mental health provision was
impressive; and
- work to help prisoners resettle back into the community was
generally good.
Peter Clarke said:
“It would be wrong not to recognise the challenges faced by staff
at Feltham A in creating a safe and decent facility. Violence was
a serious problem and during the inspection there was a serious
assault on an officer. Staff should be able to work in a safe
environment and not be in constant fear of being assaulted. The
current approach is failing to deliver that reasonable
expectation and from the evidence available to us, is actually
making it worse. The focus on keeping people apart rather than
trying to change their behaviour has not worked. Feltham A is not
safe for either staff or boys.
“At Feltham B, while the violence and poor regime overshadowed
this inspection, despite everything, there was some very good
work being carried out by dedicated staff.”
- ENDS -
Notes to editors:
- A copy of the full reports, published on 30 June, can be
found on the HM Inspectorate of Prisons website
at: www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmiprisons
- HM Inspectorate of Prisons is an independent
inspectorate, inspecting places of detention to report on
conditions and treatment, and promote positive outcomes for those
detained and the public.
- Feltham A holds young people aged 15 to 18 years who are on
remand or have been convicted by the courts. Feltham B
accommodates 18 to 21-year-old convicted young adult men.
- This unannounced inspection was carried out from 23 January-3
February 2017.