The results of Ofqual's annual survey on perceptions of A levels,
GCSEs and other qualifications. Conducted 2 November to 2
December 2016. Highlights from the survey: Perceptions of
GCSEs, AS and A levels Confidence in the GCSE, AS and A level
systems is significantly higher than in previous years. Levels of
trust and confidence in the...Request free trial
The results of Ofqual's annual survey on perceptions of
A levels, GCSEs and other qualifications. Conducted 2 November to 2
December 2016.
Highlights from the survey:
Perceptions of GCSEs, AS and A levels
-
Confidence in the GCSE, AS and A level systems is
significantly higher than in previous years. Levels
of trust and confidence in the maintenance of
standards have also improved.
-
Overall figures show that, compared to last year and
previous waves, significantly higher proportions of
stakeholders agreed that GCSEs “are a trusted
qualification” (65% to 72%), that “standards are
maintained year on year” (30% to 40%), and that
“marking of GCSEs is accurate” (26% to 38%).
-
A significantly higher proportion of stakeholders
also agreed that “AS and A level standards are
maintained year on year” (37% to 47%), and that “the
marking of AS and A levels is accurate” (31% to 41%).
-
Around twice as many young people agreed than
disagreed that GCSE and AS and A level marking was
accurate. The net proportion of teachers in agreement
was also larger for both sets of qualifications than
in previous years.
- The proportion of stakeholders who, in autumn 2016,
were aware of the new 9 to 1 grading system was
significantly higher than in wave 14. However, this
improving picture of understanding is unlikely to reflect
current levels of awareness, as Ofqual has since
undertaken a wide-ranging communications and engagement
campaign to raise awareness and understanding of the new
grading system.
National Reference Test
- The first National Reference Test was undertaken in
England in February and March this year. The data suggest
that in November last year about half of surveyed head
teachers were aware of the test. Ofqual, and its delivery
partner NFER, have since provided more information to
schools, so these results are unlikely to be a true
reflection of the current picture. Awareness and
familiarity of the test is expected to improve as more
schools are engaged with it over coming years.
Review of marking and appeals
-
Parents, young people and the general public strongly
agreed that the systems used by schools and colleges
to challenge GCSE, AS and A level results in England
are fair. Teachers were also more likely to agree
than disagree.
-
There was no change in the proportion of stakeholders
who were aware of the review of marking, moderation
and appeals systems compared with last year, and head
teachers remained the group with the highest claimed
awareness, at 75%.
-
When asked about whether they felt that they had
adequate information about exam boards’ review of
marking, moderation and appeals systems, overall more
stakeholders disagreed (45%) than agreed (28%).
-
Awareness of the systems for appealing vocational
qualification results was much lower, with only half
of head teachers and a quarter of teachers responding
that they knew about the process.
Special consideration, reasonable adjustments and
malpractice
-
Head teachers and teachers agreed by significant
margins that they have adequate information about the
arrangements and adjustments available for eligible
GCSE, AS and A level students. They also agreed that
it is fair, and that the right adjustments are made
for the right students.
-
They also strongly agreed that they have adequate
information about what constitutes malpractice and to
whom it should be reported and that allegations are
fairly investigated.
Commenting on today’s release, Michelle Meadows, Deputy
Chief Regulator, Ofqual, said:
We are pleased that confidence in GCSEs, AS and A
levels is improving. This bears out anecdotal feedback
we have had from stakeholders about how we have engaged
the sector with the reform programme and other changes
we have introduced.
This is one of many positives reflected in the report.
We continue to be in period of major reform and many of
the systems and processes surveyed in this report are
currently changing. There will inevitably be a period
of bedding in as teachers and schools become more
familiar with the changes. This is certainly true of
the National Reference Test.
We also know that since this research was carried out
we have done even more work around the new 9 to 1
grading structure, so the current position is likely to
be better than reported here, but it still encouraging
to see the figures increasing from this time last year.
Read the full Official
Statistics.
|