This House of Commons Library briefing paper analyses recent
policy and debate on the integration of NHS-provided healthcare
and local authority-provided social care in the UK. This has been
a key policy priority for successive Governments, with the aim of
improving patient care and saving money for the NHS and local
authorities.
What is integration?
Health and adult social care services in England have
traditionally been funded, administered and accessed
separately. Health has been provided free at the point of use
through the National Health Service, whilst local authorities
have provided means-tested social care to their local
populations.
It is argued that patients with both health and social care
needs are badly served by the current model, and that by
integrating the NHS and local authorities, the patient can be
put at the centre of how care is organised.
Policy on integration has focused on delivering care outside of
hospital, instead delivering care as close to the patient as
possible, either at home or in their community. It has also
sought to reduce problems caused by the ineffective interaction
of health and social care, such as unnecessary hospital
admissions and delayed discharges.
Why is it important?
Demographic trends, such as an ageing population and increasing
life expectancy for those with multiple, long-term conditions,
mean that there is an increasing number of patients with both
health and social care needs.
As well as improving the experience for the patient, it is
argued that integration can save money by cutting down on
emergency hospital admissions and delayed discharges. This is
particularly significant in light of current funding pressures
for the NHS and local authorities, although the scope of
potential savings has been disputed.
What challenges are faced when integrating
services?
There are a number of challenges faced by successive
Governments attempting to better integrate health and
social care. These include:
- Different funding incentives for the NHS and local
authorities
- Different funding models - free at the point of use vs.
means-tested
- Challenges integrating different workforce cultures
- Difficulties implementing effective information sharing
- Different inspection frameworks
- Other Government policy priorities competing with the
integration agenda
- The cost to NHS bodies and local authorities of integrating
services
- Problems with joint-Departmental oversight
These challenges, and Government attempts to address them, are
explored further in this briefing paper.
What is the Government doing on integration?
Recent Government policies to promote integration have included
the creation of Health and Wellbeing Boards, local strategic
planning forums with representatives from health and
social care services, and the Better Care Fund, a pooled budget
between the NHS and local authorities, to which the Government
has committed £3.9 billion in 2016/17. There have also been a
number of smaller, pilot projects to improve integration.
Many of these policies are relatively new, and so detailed
evaluation of performance is often limited in its availability.
However, their impact so far, and comment from those in the
health and social care sectors is examined in this briefing
paper. In the case of the Better Care Fund, the policy has not
succeeded in reducing the number of emergency hospital
admissions and delayed discharges, which have continued to rise
in recent years.
Integration is also playing an increasing part in the
Government's devolution agenda - particularly in Greater
Manchester - with health and social care powers being
devolved to local areas.
What are the devolved administrations doing on
integration?
The four UK nations have taken different policy paths with
regards to integration. Scotland and Wales have both passed
recent legislation promoting integration, including moves
towards fully integrated health and social care commissioning
in Scotland. Northern Ireland has had an integrated health and
social care system since the 1970s.