The Work and Pensions Committee launches an inquiry into the
benefit cap and how it affects British households. The Committee
welcomes written submissions. Deadline is Friday 7 April 2017.
Call for written submissions
The Committee invites written submissions addressing the
following points:
- The cap is intended to incentivise behavioural change amongst
claimants and secure savings for the Exchequer. To what extent is
it achieving that?
- To what extent has claimant behaviour responded to the cap,
through moving into work, moving house etc? What effect does the
lower cap have on incentives, what are the barriers to
behavioural change and how can they be overcome?
- Does the cap address high underlying rates of housing benefit
and child maintenance in a fair way?
- What are the consequential costs of the cap for other public
spending, such as that by local authorities?
- What are the consequences for Discretionary Housing Payments
(DHPs) and what impact does use of DHPs have on behavioural
change?
- Are there unintended consequences (either positive or
negative) of the cap?
Deadline for written submissions is Friday 7 April
2017.
Submit your views through the Benefit cap inquiry
page.
Inquiry background
The benefit cap - which limits the income households receive in
certain benefits - was reduced from £26,000 a year to £20,000 a
year outside London and £23,000 within London in November 2016.
The Government estimates that, in the absence of any 'behavioural
changes' from claimants, 88,000 households are affected by the
new cap, compared with around 20,000 under the previous policy.
Around a third of the affected households are expected to be in
London or the South East although the cap will affect households
across Great Britain.
Committee comments
Rt Hon MP, Chair of the Committee,
said:
"Quite often when the Government reduces a benefit, the
justification given is that it will incentivise work, and
obviously encouraging and supporting the strivers is a laudable
goal. People can escape the benefit cap if they move into work.
The Government needs to be challenged to put much more resources
in helping families whose benefits are going to be in cut in this
way to know that there is an exit and one which they might be
able to grasp soon."
Karan Buck MP, Member of the Committee said:
"The Government’s argument for the Benefit Cap is that it will
incentivise work. Set against this is the fact that many of those
affected have been found to be incapable of work. Neither does
the cap reflect the reality of housing, even of homeless
households. The Committee will want to look at the actual
impact the cap is having, who is affected and how it interacts
with other factors, from health to housing."