Successive governments have failed to focus on the issues raised
by an ageing society. Raising the State Pension Age, which
governments of all hues have tried, is not a solution as many
people in their 50s and 60s leave the workforce much earlier. The
Government must prioritise measures to incentivise people in
their mid-50s to mid-60s to remain in or return to work.
Even higher levels of immigration, which may be too large for
many voters, would not be sufficient to address the challenges an
ageing UK faces. Efforts to raise fertility rates in other
countries have largely failed and would likely fail here too.
Discussions about an ageing society, driven by both declining
fertility and rising life expectancy, focus too much on the
issues faced by old people today. In fact, the challenges will be
felt most acutely by those who are young today. People born now
and in the recent past stand to live much longer lives than
previous generations, so they will need to retire later and save
more to ensure they don't run out of money in their later years.
They will need to rethink their approach to life-course planning.
There is widespread ignorance of how much it costs to retire. The
Government should consider an education campaign on this issue
and find out if the UK's financial services sector is suitably
organised to provide for the population as it ages.
As part of the drive to increase the proportion of mid-50s to
mid-60s who stay in work, the Government should look at the tax
system and eliminate any cliff edges in public service pensions.
As well as improving the UK's fiscal position this will help
prevent the expected increase in pensioner poverty if the age at
which people stop working is not postponed. Measures are also
needed to encourage more young people to enter the workforce.
These are among the conclusions of a new report, ‘Preparing for
an ageing society', published today by the cross-party House of
Lords Economic Affairs Committee:
- The OBR forecasts that "on current policy settings" the
fiscal challenges posed by an ageing society would push borrowing
above 20 per cent and debt above 270 per cent of GDP by the early
2070s.
- The UK's dependency ratio is forecast by the OBR to increase
from 31 per cent to 47 per cent of the population over the next
50 years without major changes. This raises the challenge of
funding state pensions, healthcare and the welfare costs of the
older population from taxation raised on a reduced proportion of
the population in employment.
- One of the factors that plays a role in determining people's
workforce participation is caring responsibilities. The crisis in
adult social care, which the committee published a report on in
2019, remains a scandal and the committee urges the Government to
address this urgently. However, the reality is an ageing
population is likely to require more care workers, which
inevitably means fewer workers available for other productive
sectors of the economy.
- Age discrimination may also reduce the number of over 50s
working, but the committee heard evidence that the most damaging
form of age discrimination may be self-directed, with older
workers operating under a mistaken impression of its extent and
therefore limiting their own decisions.
- There is no evidence of systematic differences between older
and younger workers as far as productivity is concerned in the
majority of types of work.
- There is a growing gap between life expectancy and healthy
life expectancy. The committee heard evidence that almost a
quarter of people over 50 who leave work before they want to or
should, do so because of unsupported health needs. The Government
should set out the policies it has in place to narrow this gap,
and the specific impacts it expects those policies to have.
- The Government response to the rise in the old-age dependency
ratio seems primarily focused on improving productivity. The
difficulties successive governments have had in raising
productivity, as well as the scale of the fiscal challenge of an
ageing society, mean that this cannot be the sole policy focus.
, Chair of the House of
Lords Economic Affairs Committee, said:
“People are having fewer children and living longer and
successive governments have simply not focused on the seismic
effects a rapidly ageing population will have on our economy and
society.
“Raising the state pension age, which saves the Government money,
but increases pensioner poverty as many people have already
stopped working by their sixties, is a red herring. Getting more
people in their fifties and sixties to stay in or return to work
is key.
“To successfully confront this challenge the approach to
financial management of today's and tomorrow's young people will
need to change. They will need, from a much earlier stage in
their lives, to plan and prepare to work longer and save more.
“The lack of a published strategy or forum for discussion on this
topic demonstrates that this serious, but long-term, issue is not
be taken seriously enough. The Government needs to begin
addressing the impact of ageing now so that all age groups can
live better and longer lives.”