The Education Secretary's response to today's SEN Tribunal
statistics and SEN statistics. They
show:
- There were 24,000 SEND tribunals in 2024/25,
the highest amount in any year, and an increase of 36%
compared to the previous year.
- In the same period, disposals also rose to their highest
number in the timeseries at 19,000, and open caseload rose to
12,000, increases of 34% and 45% respectively.
- There are over 1.7 million pupils in England with SEN for the
2024/25 academic year (January 2025). This is an increase of
5.6% since last year, continuing the increasing
trend since 2016:
-
- There are 482,600 pupils with an EHC
plan, an increase of 11.1%. This is 5.3%
of all pupils, an increase of 0.5 percentage points.
- There are 1,284,300 pupils with SEN
support without an EHC plan, an increase of 3.7%. This is
14.2% of all pupils, an increase of 0.6
percentage points.
-
Free school meals: Pupils with SEN are more
likely to be eligible for free school meals. 43.8% of pupils
with an EHC plan and 39.3% of pupils with SEN support are
eligible for free school meals in 2025. This compares to 22.2%
of all pupils in schools without SEN.
Education Secretary said:
“Behind each one of these figures is a family desperately
fighting for even the most basic support for their child, leaving
a staggering number of parents exhausted while young people are
denied precious help.
“It doesn't have to be this way, and this government will deliver
the reform that families are crying out for through our Plan for
Change – giving an excellent education to every child.
“We have already taken the first steps to identify and meet
children's needs earlier in mainstream schools, including through
more early intervention across speech and language, ADHD and
autism to prevent needs from escalating and £740 million to
encourage councils to create more specialist places in mainstream
schools."
Background:
- As yesterday's Spending Review outlined, to make the system
more inclusive and improve outcomes for all children and young
people, the government will reform the current SEND system.
Details of the government's intended approach to SEND reform will
be set out in a Schools White Paper in the autumn. The government
will also set out further details on supporting local authorities
as we transition to a reformed system as part of the upcoming
local government funding reform consultation: Spending Review 2025
(HTML) - GOV.UK
- In December we confirmed a significant increase of £1 billion
in high needs funding for 2025-26, which will help local
authorities with the increasing costs of supporting those
children and young people with EHC plans.
- It recognises the immense need in the sector, helping LAs and
schools to meet the costs of providing the support that children
and young people with SEND require, and takes an important step
in returning local authorities to financial sustainability.
- The Government has also announced £740 million capital for
councils to create more high needs places, including specialist
places in mainstream schools . This new funding can be used to
adapt classrooms to be more accessible for children with SEND,
and to create specialist facilities within mainstream schools
that can deliver more intensive support adapted to suit the
pupils' needs.
- We've allocated £3.4 million
in 25/26, jointly with NHSE, to continue delivering the
ELSEC (Early Language Support for Every Child) programme,
extending to up to 20,000 more children.
- The Partnerships for Inclusion of Neurodiversity in Schools
(PINS) helps build teacher and staff capacity to identify and
better meet the needs of neurodiverse children. We've announced £9.5
million in 25/26 to continue delivering PINS in a further
1,200 schools – reaching 300,000 children, including those with
dyslexia, autism and ADHD.
- The SEND Tribunal hears appeals about LA decisions: not to
undertake an EHC assessment, not to issue an EHCP following
assessment, the SEN described in an EHCP, the SEN provision
specified in an EHCP, name and type of setting named in a plan,
or that no setting is named, not to reassess need, not to amend
or replace an EHCP following a review or assessment, and a
decision to cease to maintain an EHCP
- The Tribunal's decisions on these are binding, but it can
also make non-binding recommendations on the health and social
care elements of an EHC plan, where there is also an appealable
educational element; and hear appeals against settings for
discriminating on grounds of a child or young person's disability
Gemma's story:
Gemma Pearman, aged 44 from Kent, appealed to the SEND tribunal
after her local council did not specify direct speech and
language therapy for her three-year-old daughter, Elizabeth, who
has Downs Syndrome, despite the fact that she is pre-verbal and
has a limited range of speech sounds.
Gemma says this comes after the council refused to assess
Elizabeth until she appealed to the tribunal even though their
previous council had been in the process of undergoing an
assessment before the family were forced to move home.
She has been granted an EHCP, but it does not come into force
until January 2027 at the earliest when Elizabeth is aged five
and in school.
Gemma has to wait until March 2026 for the tribunal hearing to
take place.
She said:
“As a mother, I want my child to have the best start to her life,
but the tribunal hearing is not due to take place until another
10 months. This is precious time wasted.
“We know that communication is fundamental and that early
intervention is vital and every day without this support is an
extra day where my daughter's development and prospects are
harmed. The EHCP misses a golden opportunity to support my
daughter in making progress now and in the right way.
“Being forced to appeal the decision isn't only delaying support,
it's causing further harm by taking a toll on my entire family's
wellbeing because of how exhausting it is. It has been eaten up
with paperwork, understanding SEN law, drafting emails to garner
support, and desperately looking for advice from charities and
parents.
“This is time that would be better spent with my daughter,
enjoying her early years, not fighting with my local authority
because she has been left without the support she needs to
thrive.
“I am shocked at the lack of transparency, the disregard for SEN
law and the delaying tactics employed.
“It shouldn't be this hard to get the sort of support that so
many children with Down Syndrome are always going to need and
should have at an earlier point as a guarantee.
“This process does not work for the child, for the parents or for
the local authorities which are wasting money by inevitably
having to go to tribunal and even pay out compensation.”
Further case studies:
There are many mainstream schools already demonstrating good
inclusive practice – see case studies below:
- Iveson Primary School in Yorkshire has introduced dedicated
spaces and support systems that have enabled the school to
provide for sensory needs, staff these spaces in a way that
supports all children and adapt the curriculum to enhance an
inclusive approach – positively impacting children's social,
emotional, and academic progress.
- Becontree Primary School in London has modified and
creatively used existing spaces which has had significant impact
on the learning, engagement, and integration of children with
autism.
- St Matthew's Primary School in Luton has introduced targeted
sessions to help children develop their speech and language which
has had a significant impact on children who were previously
unable to confidently communicate verbally in group settings.
These children are now able to have conversations with teachers
and communicate more effectively with their peers.
- Livingston Academy in Bournemouth has strengthened the
skillset of their staff, enabling teachers to respond to pupil's
needs faster – reassuring parents that their children are
receiving the support they need, and positively impacting
attendance and inclusion.
- Epsom Downs Primary school in Surrey has developed a forum
for parents to get involved and share ideas or suggestions about
themes that are important to them – like SEND processes and
supporting the transition of pupils between years groups.