The reforms announced today to be implemented or consulted on
represent a fundamental change to the way that the state supports
people out-of-work. At its core, the decision is to tilt the
welfare system away from those who are disabled and towards those
who are unemployed without an assessed disability. The package as
a whole is expected to save over £5 billion by 2029-30,
which would make it a bigger
cut to welfare than seen in any fiscal event since
2015.
-
For decades the UK has had
separate benefits for incapacity to work (currently the
health element of universal credit (UC)) and higher costs of
living resulting from a disability (currently Personal
Independence Payment (PIP)). These are assessed separately.
From 2028-29, getting PIP will be the factor that determines
whether you get the health element of UC –
meaning there will be no
support specifically for disabilities that prevent
work. Those who
would otherwise qualify for the health element of UC – but not PIP
(currently 900,000 people) – will therefore not get the
element and be worse off by £2,400 per year
(today's
prices).
-
Kendall also announced an increase
in the basic amount of UC that all claimants get, a freeze
(until 2029–30) in the health element, and, for new
claimants, a halving of the health element. These reforms
imply substantial redistribution across benefit
recipients. Families who receive the health element of UC–
currently 2.4 million – will get £280 less a year in 2029-30,
while the 4.5 million other families on UC will get £150 more
a year in 2029-30. New claimants to the health element of UC will receive
£2,500 less a year than they would have without these
announcements.
-
Cuts in the generosity of the UC
health element weaken the financial incentive to it – part of
the aim of this reform - but the long-term plan to scrap the
work capability assessment and instead base eligibility on
the PIP assessment will considerably strengthen the incentive to claim
PIP. Currently,
the average PIP recipient receives £7,200 per year. Under the
reform, being awarded PIP would also get the claimant the UC
health element (£2,400 per year in today's
prices).
-
The other major saving –
tightening PIP eligibility criteria – is by comparison
relatively uncertain. The impact of reforms to assessment
criteria are more difficult to predict than changes in
amounts paid, as the way claimants approach the assessment is
likely to change in response. Previous governments attempting
similar reforms have found that they have saved much less
than hoped.
-
A key part of the motivation for
these reforms is to strengthen incentives to work. But on
this front the package is a mixed bag. For some people with
health conditions work incentives will be
strengthened. But
the 4.5 million households who are on UC but do not get a
health-related benefit will see a weakening in
incentives. There's a clear risk here: those whose incentives are
weakened might be precisely the group that are most able to
respond to financial incentives, while stronger incentives
(and employment support) are targeted at those who often are
unable to work.
Tom Waters, an Associate
Director at IFS said: “This package is a fundamental break from the past few
decades of welfare policy. The increase in basic out-of-work
support, while not very large, is the biggest permanent real
terms rise since at least 1980. With it is promised even higher
support in the period shortly after job loss in the form of
contribution-based unemployment insurance. At the same time the
health-related benefit system will be tightened, cut, and
entitlement will no longer depend upon whether you can work or
not. The hope is more employment and fewer people in the
disability and incapacity benefit system. The risk is that it's
precisely the individuals receiving health-related
benefits that are least responsive to
financial incentives to work, and perhaps most in need of extra
financial support.”
ENDS
Notes to Editor
IFS response to announced reforms
to disability and incapacity benefits is an IFS
briefing by Anna Henry, Eduin Latimer,
Matthew Oulton, Sam Ray-Chaudhuri and Tom Waters.
You can read the
briefing on the IFS website here