The House of Lords European Affairs Committee is today inviting
written contributions to its new inquiry into data adequacy and
its implications for the UK-EU relationship.
The inquiry comes ahead of the upcoming renewal decision to
continue allowing the free flow of commercial and criminal
investigation related personal data to and from the bloc, which
was granted by the EU post-Brexit under the General Data
Protection Regulation and the Law Enforcement Directive.
The inquiry will focus on how current arrangements are working in
practice, including benefits and shortcomings, as well as the
possible implications of any divergence in the respective data
protection regimes of the UK and EU.
Topics the committee is seeking evidence on include:
-
Assessment of the existing adequacy arrangement
underpinning data flows between the UK and the European
Union
-
Possible challenges to UK-EU data adequacy
regime
-
Implications of a no or disrupted UK-EU data adequacy
scenario
-
Lessons learned from other countries’ experiences with
the adequacy system and engagement with the European
Commission’s process
The committee invites interested individuals to submit written
evidence by 12pm on Friday 3 May
2024. The full call for evidence and further information
is available on the committee’s website.
, Chair of the Constitution
Committee said:
“The free flow of data between the UK and EU is vital for
trade and economic relations, and for effective law enforcement
cooperation. Currently, the transfer of commercial and criminal
investigation data is based on an EU adequacy decision which
expires next year. Without it, maintaining data flows between the
UK and the EU could become less straightforward for businesses
and, therefore, have an impact on the UK economy. It could also
have an impact on UK-EU security cooperation as it could lead to
restrictions on the flow of data for law enforcement purposes
between the UK and the EU.
“My Committee has therefore decided to examine the way the
current arrangement works, the factors that will influence a
future data adequacy decision, and the implications should that
decision be negative.”
“The Committee encourages anyone with expertise in or
experience of the matters under consideration in this inquiry to
submit written evidence. The wider the range of evidence we
receive, the more firmly based will be our conclusions.”