Today the Foreign Affairs Committee launches its inquiry into International
Relations within the Multilateral System. The inquiry will
look at how a broad range of countries are using multilateral
organisations, be that through engagement and influencing,
working around them or obstruction.
The inquiry will ask how key countries – such as India and Brazil
– view their role within the multilateral system and what this
means for the UK’s effectiveness within these institutions.
The inquiry will examine the emergence of “minilaterals” –
regional or issues-based groups of “like-minded” or
“like-interested” countries, such as BRICS and the Quad – and ask
whether more are needed to fill gaps in the rules based
international order.
It will ask how UK diplomacy can increase the perceived relevance
and legitimacy of multilateral institutions, and whether enough
progress has been made in strengthening multilaterals, such as
Interpol and OSCE.
This inquiry follows on from the Committee’s 2021 report
“In the room: the UK’s role
in multilateral diplomacy”, which concluded that autocratic
states were attempting to aggressively co-opt strategically
important multilateral organisations and to fundamentally
redefine their founding principles.
The Committee is interested in specific examples and has a
particular interest in these countries: Brazil, China, France,
India, Turkey, South Africa, Nigeria, Mexico, Egypt, Saudi
Arabia, Russia, United States and Indonesia
The deadline for submitting written evidence is Monday 26
February 2024.
Chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee, , said:
“The past few years have brought multiple global challenges: the
COVID-19 pandemic, the climate crisis, Russia’s renewed illegal
invasion of Ukraine, and, most recently, the conflict between
Israel and Hamas. The coming year will see key elections around
the world as well as significant challenges around conflict and
climate change. Global challenges require a global response, yet
the rules based international order has been continuously tested.
“The geopolitical landscape has changed considerably and the way
that countries interact within multilaterals has shifted. We’ve
seen attempts to subvert and undermine the existing multilateral
institutions and rival systems set up, in order to challenge the
perceived dominance of the West. But we have also seen
‘minilaterals’ step in to deal more quickly and effectively with
regional issues.
“This inquiry will ask what the future holds for multilateral
institutions, including whether new multilaterals, with a focus
on regions and specific issues, are needed. It will ask whether
existing multilaterals will retain their relevance in the face of
corrosive actors and international challenges.”
The Committee welcomes written evidence on the
following:
- How do key countries see their roles within multilateral
organisations?
- How does that affect the influence or effectiveness of the UK
within multilaterals?
- Which countries operate outside the multilateral system
because they do not see the benefits of participation? What
alternative approaches are they taking?
- Following the renewed illegal invasion of Ukraine and events
since October 7, 2023, are there particular groupings or blocs of
countries emerging within multilateral organisations? What are
the consequences for the UK and its allies? How has the
international response to recent conflicts affected confidence in
multilaterals?
- What is driving the proliferation of ‘minilaterals’: regional
or issues-based groups of “like-minded” or “like-interested”
countries? Are there any further ‘minilaterals’ needed to meet
gaps in the rules based international order?
- Which ‘minilateral’ groups support or complement the work of
multilateral organisations, and which have been established to
circumvent the multilateral system?
- How can UK diplomacy increase the perceived relevance and
legitimacy of multilateral institutions?
- What progress has been made by the Government since our 2021
report, In the Room, in strengthening multilaterals
(such as Interpol and the OSCE)?
- What has been the impact of the UK’s proposal to expand the
composition of the UN Security Council?
Each submission should be no longer than 3,000 words and contain
a brief introduction about the author. Submissions should be in
malleable format such as MS Word (not PDFs) with no use of
colour, logos or photos. Further guidance is available on our
Written Evidence
Guidance.