IPPR: ‘Support in name only’: Jobcentre employment services failing jobseekers and businesses
|
Quantity over quality approach means employers bombarded with
inappropriate applications, wasting time and resources People
with good qualifications and work experience forced to apply for
‘any job’ IPPR calls for a complete overhaul of Jobcentre
support services to offer upgraded work and career coaching to all
who need it Employment support services for people...Request free trial
Employment support services for people claiming benefits aren’t working for employers or jobseekers and need to be reformed into a new universal service, according to a new report by IPPR. Services run by local Jobcentres to help people into and on in work are based on the principle of conditionality – a threat that financial support will be reduced or stopped if requirements aren’t met. This approach isn’t working for employers as it leads to people applying for jobs they are entirely unsuitable for, wasting time and resources for businesses, just so they can meet their job application targets and avoid being sanctioned. One employer for a security company said recruiting through the Jobcentre can often be a “waste of their time and a waste of my time” and added that he would like to see work coaches do more to support the right candidates to apply for the right jobs. The use of sanctions also doesn’t work for jobseekers as it rests on an assumption that people on low incomes wouldn’t want to take steps to improve their situation of their own free will. It fails to recognise that many people want to work or increase their earnings, but face barriers to doing so, like limited access to childcare, low confidence, high travel costs or living with a health condition. The Jobcentres ABC approach to employment (‘Any Job, Better Job, Career’) in which people are encouraged to apply for any role which generates some earnings in the first instance, before, in theory, being supported to progress in work and ultimately towards a career, is failing many jobseekers. One parent, Ella, with a higher education certificate in social studies, was qualified and looking to find suitable work in criminal justice, youth work or court advocacy. However, she received no tailored support and was forced to take a job in retail. She said: “There’s nothing to personalise your job search with your experiences, your education, your employment history or anything to differentiate you from anyone else... any job they’d throw at me I’d have to take, otherwise I would be sanctioned.” Other users of the current service gave their own accounts of its shortcomings through the Changing Realities project, based at the University of York, and are quoted throughout the IPPR report (see examples in Notes below). To overcome these problems IPPR recommends the government creates a new public employment service, available to everyone who needs it, which must include:
Melanie Wilkes, associate director for work and the welfare state at IPPR, said: “Employment support services provide support in name only, but they simply aren’t working. They are failing both businesses and jobseekers. The Jobcentres’ approach of relying on sanctions to push people into jobs reinforces insecure, poor quality work and is simply a waste of everyone’s time. “We need a new universal public employment service to help people get into, and progress in. meaningful employment.” Henry Parkes, IPPR principal research fellow and co-author of the report, said: “At a time when our whole economy is being held back by workforce challenges it’s more urgent than ever to ensure everyone can access genuine help finding the jobs that work for them and their wider circumstances. “Rethinking the system of employment support, so that work coaches can focus on finding solutions that work for both employees and employers, should be the first step towards a new universal service that works better for everyone – and for the UK economy.” |
