The Trade Remedies Authority (TRA) has today recommended putting
a new trade remedy measure in place to protect the UK’s optical
fibre cable industry from harm caused by low-priced imports from
China.
Optical fibre cable is used in the delivery of broadband services
to homes and businesses. The TRA has been investigating whether
imports of these products are being dumped in the UK at prices
below what they would sell for in their home country.
Around 5.7 million fibre kilometres of optical fibre cable was
sold in the UK in 2021, including UK producer sales and imported
goods and the UK market is expected to grow over the next five
years. This rise is expected to be driven by network upgrades as
demand for broadband increases as well as the Government’s
investment in broadband infrastructure, such as Project
Gigabit – a £5 billion programme to enable hard-to-reach
communities to access faster broadband. The TRA has estimated
that UK-produced optical fibre accounts for around half of all UK
consumption, with the rest of the market supplied by imports from
China, India, the US, Poland and Germany.
During its investigation, the TRA determined that there is
already damage to the UK industry, having found clear evidence of
price undercutting, indicating that UK businesses are struggling
to compete with the dumped imports. The TRA therefore recommended
that the Secretary of State for International Trade put in place
a provisional
measure on these imports while it completes its
investigation.
TRA Chief Executive Oliver Griffiths said:
“Optical fibre cable provides higher speeds and bandwidth and as
such plays an important role in meeting the UK’s internet needs.
The interim measures the TRA has recommended will ensure UK
producers are able to compete with imports and are able to
continue supplying this vital growth industry.”
The TRA’s initial conclusions are published on its public file in
a Statement
of Essential Facts (SEF). Interested parties to the case can
register to comment on the findings and submit any additional
evidence. The TRA will then assess any additional information and
submit its final recommendation to the Secretary of State for
Business & Trade for a decision.
The investigation was carried out in response to an application
from a UK manufacturer and information was gathered from
interested parties to establish whether imports had been dumped
in the UK at prices below their normal value and whether this was
harming the UK industry. The TRA also carried out an Economic
Interest Test (EIT) to assess if it would be in the UK’s economic
interest to put in place a trade remedy measure in the form
of a tariff at the border, to mitigate any injury from the
imports.
Under the new provisional measure, importers will need to provide
a guarantee (in the form of cash, bond or bank guarantee) to HM
Revenue and Customs that shows they can pay the duty that they
may ultimately be required to pay on imports of these goods. This
will help make sure UK businesses that make similar goods don’t
suffer further damage from these imports while the TRA completes
its investigation.
The different rates that importers will have to pay are listed
below, comparing the provisional rates with the rates recommended
in the SEF.
Dumping Margins
Dumping Margin (Provisional Measure)
Dumping Margin (SEF)
SDG Group
31.5%
31.3%
Non-sampled exporters*
31.5%
31.3%
Residual rate**
47.2%
44.6%
- Non-sampled exporters are those that cooperated with the
TRA’s investigation but were not part of the sample.
** The residual rate is the rate that all other non-cooperative
overseas exporters will have to pay.
Separate investigation into subsidies on optical fibre cable
imports
The TRA is also carrying out a separate investigation to
determine whether the Chinese imports entering the UK market are
also benefiting from subsidies which lower their production
costs. This investigation will report its initial
conclusions soon and both cases are expected to conclude this
summer, once the TRA’s final recommendations are submitted to the
Secretary of State for Business & Trade.
Notes to Editors