Call for project proposals in support of defence reforms in Ukraine
|
The British Embassy Kyiv is accepting project proposals for the
financial years 2023-2024 and 2024-2025 (pending funding) from
not-for-profit organisations operating in Ukraine. War is a
catalyst for change; however such change is not limited to military
development. Government structures, processes and policies
must also develop at pace. UK Special Defence Advisor
Programme is seeking to sponsor projects aimed at supporting
Ukraine’s efforts in Security Sector...Request free trial
The British Embassy Kyiv is accepting project proposals for the financial years 2023-2024 and 2024-2025 (pending funding) from not-for-profit organisations operating in Ukraine. War is a catalyst for change; however such change is not limited to military development. Government structures, processes and policies must also develop at pace. UK Special Defence Advisor Programme is seeking to sponsor projects aimed at supporting Ukraine’s efforts in Security Sector Reform, which has become an increasingly important activity during Ukraine’s armed conflict with the Russian Federation. Background The funding will be allocated from the UK Special Defence Advisor Programme (SDA) within British Embassy Kyiv budget. Since 2004 the SDA has been a trusted advisor embedded in the Ukrainian Ministry of Defence (U-MOD) and working with the senior leaders across defence (Ministers, senior military personnel and officials) to help them develop and articulate their reform requirements; they also coordinate UK efforts in the realm of defence-focused Security Sector Reform (SSR), and engages with the international and multilateral community to seek consistency of effort. Apart from direct advisory activities by the SDA and hired experts, SDA is also the owner of a programme comprised of reform-focused projects and recurring activities funded from the SDA budget and implemented by international and local implementing partners. Since 2014 the SDA programme-sponsored projects have been known for delivering exceptional contributions to several reform processes in Ukraine’s wider security sector including, but not limited to:
Logic of the sought intervention in 2023-2025 SDA programme is seeking projects which will use tailored Ukraine-appropriate processes and mechanisms that draw on Euro-Atlantic/NATO standards and best practices to ensure the sustainability of the results and efforts of the above-mentioned previous projects as well as building on them and expanding reforms efforts under three major delivery objectives: 1. Institutional Resilience and Good Governance in U-MOD, General Staff and affiliated entities Institutional resilience and good governance has been the heart of the Defence Reform activity aimed at ensuring that the U-MOD has systems and processes in place to successfully manage its response to the invasion as well as functioning transparently and in compliance with civilian oversight rules necessary for a democratic society in wartime and peace alike. Moreover, Defence Reform needs to be conducted in light of the ongoing conflict, but with an eye on the post-conflict dividend, ensuring that Ukraine can not only win the war, but also ‘win the peace’. Also, despite the ongoing war which requires a focus on the immediate operational tasks, the MoD sees it necessary to begin tackling structural issues of its performance and eradicating Soviet management legacy to lay solid base to transitioning to a modern NATO-standard and civilian driven defence policy agency. During the proposed financial cycle successful project(s) will assist U-MOD and other relevant authorities to make progress with significant changes to their approach to Policy, Project Management and Evidenced-based decision making in order to better situate the Ukrainian State for future security challenges and military operations that have been started already. Thus, the requested capacity support must include, but not limited to: 1.1. Provide U-MOD with additional embedded capacity to help adapt and implement current policies, processes and organisational structures to meet NATO standards 1.2. Building permanent in-house analytical capacity for MoD’s leadership, which would include a methodology for data gathering, analysis and drafting policy options for a particular issue of interest 1.3. Design of an evidence-based process for NATO standards implementation across MoD and AFU 1.4. Support Ukraine with its transition from a Soviet-style command authority, to one aligned with NATO systems. Including, but not limited to: Democratic Civilian Control of the AFU, embedding the distinction between defence policy and operational management, and reinforcing delegated command and decision making 1.5. Continue providing support to the Verkhovna Rada Defence Committee in developing the new laws on Democratic Civilian Control of the AFU and military justice reform 1.6. Re-assessment and a policy design for Ukrainian post-war defence industry 1.7. Fighting disinformation and creating verified source of military information for local and international audiences, such as a military information hub or a platform 1.8. Support and coordinate UK efforts in the creation of a U-MOD strategic analytical and lessons-learned centre 1.9. Assisting U-MOD with the conceptual analysis and potential planning for post-conflict activities, including: the transition away from Martial Law, improved integration with the wider Security Sector, and analysis (gaps/needs) for Disarmament, Demobilisation and Reintegration. 2. Transparency, Accountability, Anti-corruption Recent highly-publicised corruption scandal in defence procurement system triggered a series of dismissals and a renewed appetite within U-MOD for progressing with transparency and anti-corruption mechanisms in defence procurement and management processes. The Defence Minister has acknowledged flaws in defence procurement and vowed to return civilian control over it, which was in turn reflected in adoption in the first reading of a draft bill on changes to the Law on Defence Procurement to add transparency and accountability measures, the work on which was sponsored by the SDA Programme. Moreover, anti-corruption measures from the Defence Minister include prosecuting 621 U-MOD officials who will face charges as the result of U-MOD Internal Audit Department’s (IAD) efforts. The SDA Programme has been actively sponsoring U-MOD IAD reform and strengthening its capability since 2016 through devising a road-map for reforming the department, conducting regular reviews on reform progress and training auditors. This presents a unique opportunity to leverage political will and ensure U-MOD and the wider security sector progress towards adopting transparent governance approach, reforming its secrecy approach, and reducing corruption practices in supply chain on the whole. Thus, the requested capacity support must include, but not limited to: 2.1. Continue providing U-MOD with assistance in continuing reform of the Internal Audit Department in accordance with the recommendations by NATO Building Integrity and results of independent evaluations, accepted by the U-MOD (including implementation review, auditor accreditation, improved IA tracking and audit) 2.2. Provide support to the National Defence University’s ‘Building Integrity, Transparency, and Ending Corruption’ (BITEC) team related to their awareness and delivery of ‘best practice’ training, central position within the GoU anti-corruption efforts, and coordination with UK MOD related institutions 2.3. Continue providing support to the Verkhovna Rada Defence Committee in developing the new law on secrecy which would reduce current secrecy approach in order to decrease classification and provide for transition into peacetime regulations 2.4. Continue development of by-laws of the law on secrecy in form of legal acts in the field of defence procurement, which require changes to reduce the level of secrecy 2.5. Perform functions of watchdog in area of anti-corruption in defence area through: 2.5.1. continued participation of independent experts in the Anti-Corruption Council under the Ministry of Defence of Ukraine; and 2.5.2. providing independent monitoring of reporting on the public part of defence procurement after this becomes possible; 2.6. Continued consultation and support of the National Agency for Prevention of Corruption in the implementation of the State anti-corruption program for 2023-2025. 3.Reputational and Human-centred Security Inequality in peacetime is not the same as inequality in times of war. Immediate threats to the State’s survival shifted Ukraine’s focus away from questions of social inclusion and equality, while at the same time, war has put them in an increasingly scrutinised position. Implementation of the National Action Plan for the Resolution of the UN Security Council 1325 “Women, Peace, Security” (NAP) is falling behind the suggested plan, and efforts need to be undertaken by civil society to advance the implementation, as well as intensify efforts in promoting Human Rights, Accountability for War Crimes, Women, Peace & Security and Gender Equality agenda. Thus, the requested intervention must include, but not limited to: 3.1. Support in creation of an efficient human-centred democratic control over Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU) and providing independent monitoring of the problematic issues (identified through a gap analysis) in social and gender inclusion 3.2. Support U-MOD, General Staff and AFU in establishing an efficient system to ensure accountability for violation of the International Humanitarian Law in AFU, including drafting necessary by-laws and regulations and training NCOs and other relevant groups 3.3. Support for U-MOD, General Staff and AFU in ensuring that the right policies, doctrines and training provisions are in place for Ukraine to meet its IHL obligations and requirements 3.4. Continued assistance to U-MOD and AFU in implementing NAP in order to ensure better opportunities for women and minorities, welfare support, as well as protection of minority personnel across defence 3.5. Work with U-MOD and the British Embassy’s strategic communication Advisor, on support for successful and far-reaching STRATCOMs plans, to pre-empt communications risks, counter disinformation, and reinforce unity in relation to the conflict and Euro-Atlantic alignment. The activities under this programme may be subject to change dependent upon context, priorities, U-MOD appetite and feasibility. The successful bidder is expected to demonstrate flexibility, but changes will be undertaken with full consultation. Bidding guidance:
minimum £ 1 400 000 (one million four hundred thousand pounds sterling) maximum: £ 1 650 000 (one million six hundred and fifty thousand pounds sterling)
minimum £ 2 000 000 (two million pounds sterling) maximum: £ 2 300 000 (two million three hundred thousand pounds sterling)
Recommendations and requirements to project budgets are listed on tab 2 of The CSSF Project Activity-Based Budget (ODS, 18.1 KB). We are unable to fund academic courses or research, English language tuition; the purchase of land, property, IT or other equipment (clarification is provided below) and finance construction works under this Fund. Assessment: Bids will be assessed against the following criteria:
Essential skills and competencies of the implementer The implementer will have:
Funding exceptions Funding cannot be used to finance the following:
The digital spend – digital development costs in excess of £10,000 for “any external-facing service provided through the internet to citizens, businesses, civil society or non-government organisations” – has to be depicted separately in the Digital Spend Proposal form and be approved by FCDO. Process
Contacts
Additional information and documentation All implementers will be expected to sign a standard FCDO grant agreement with the Embassy. The terms of the contract or agreement are not negotiable. |
