The House of Lords International Agreements Committee is calling
on the Government to publish a trade policy framework, with clear
priorities and objectives for trade negotiations.
In a letter to the Secretary of State for Business and Trade,
published today, the committee says that as well as setting
expectations for negotiations, a framework would help the
Government by showing that moving away from its core principles
could jeopardise ratification by Parliament. The committee notes
that such an approach is used by other countries and clearly
strengthens their hand.
The committee heard from businesses, trade associations, NGOs,
unions, academics and other experts, who all believed a published
trade policy framework would improve the quality of consultation
and help them get involved with the process.
The letter outlines what the published trade framework should
include, such as: criteria for pursuing negotiations, the role of
wider foreign and domestic policy goals, aims for services
agreements, and balancing consumer and producer
interests.
The full letter is available to read on the
committee’s website.
, Chair of the International
Agreements Committee said:
“A trade policy framework should be a key priority for the new
Business and Trade department. We heard clearly in our
consultation that a framework would be a great help: both to the
Government in strengthening in its negotiating hand, and to
businesses, trade specialists and members of the public who want
to engage with negotiations.
"The Government has expressed concern that publishing a framework
might reveal too much information. We understand this view, which
is why we propose that the document should focus on core
principles and objectives, rather than possible trade-offs or red
lines. We have seen international examples of such frameworks in
use, including in the US and New Zealand, and we can see they
work well.
“Not all agreements will necessarily be able to cover all trade
policy objectives, and negotiators should retain some
flexibility.
“The committee welcomes the Department’s willingness to engage
with us on individual agreements and would like to build on this
in considering a wider framework.”