Labour analysis of the government’s pensions giveaway for the one
per cent reveals that just 11 people out of every 90,000 will
benefit: the equivalent of one football team...
Labour has committed to reversing the changes to the pensions
lifetime allowance announced in this week’s Budget, calling them
“the wrong priority at the wrong time for the wrong people”.
The scrapping of the pensions lifetime allowance in the Budget
would have meant that in 2020-1, only 0.01% of the population
would have benefitted from the massive tax break for their
retirement.
Shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury said the “vast majority of pension holders won’t
benefit from the Government’s proposals” and urged the government
to rethink their decision.
The Chancellor’s largesse was announced just minutes before grim
new figures from the Office for Budget Responsibility showed that
the real disposable income of average UK households has fallen by
£1,500 since the start of the pandemic.
Jeremy Hunt’s handouts will also mean that people with more than
£1.4 million in their pension pot are able to pay up to £150,000
less in tax. It comes as basic rate taxpayers face an extra £650
in tax next year, and the country’s overall tax burden was
projected upwards yet again.
Paul Johnson at the IFS poured cold water on the government’s
claim it would get people back into work, saying “won’t play a
big part, if any, in increasing the number of people in work.
The lifetime allowance measure alone will cost the taxpayer more
than £70,000 for every person forecast to return to the labour
market as a result of the policy.
MP, Labour’s Shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury,
said
“In the run up to the Budget, Labour called on the Government to
deal with the pension problems facing doctors. Indeed, we were
attacked for doing so by the Conservatives who said such a
proposal was unaffordable.
“The vast majority of pension won’t benefit from the Government’s
proposals because they will never get near a pension pot of more
than £1 million.
“The Government should rethink this giveaway and instead focus on
a scheme to deal with the early retirement problems facing the
NHS.”
Ends
Notes: