Responding to the National Foundation for Educational Research’s
report that states the government’s plan to have all schools in a
multi-academy trust (MAT) by 2030 is not possible, Julie
McCulloch, Director of Policy at the Association of School and
College Leaders, said: “Rather than continuing to pursue this
unachievable target, the government needs to deal with far more
pressing issues. Their immediate focus should be on addressing
the recruitment and retention crisis, which is making it
increasingly difficult to put teachers in front of classes, and
the long-term underfunding of education from early years through
to post-16. These are much greater threats to educational
standards over the next few years than some schools not being in
multi-academy trusts.
“We agree that all schools and colleges should have the
opportunity to be part of a strong group which suits their own
needs and where they both give and receive support. In many cases
this will be in the form of MATs, though other forms of
partnership can also bring significant benefits. Many local
authority schools, as well as schools which operate as single
academy trusts, are happy with the structure in which they
currently operate and struggle to see how joining a MAT would
help them to maintain or improve standards.
“These issues were evident even before the scrapping of the
Schools Bill, which has cast further doubt over this and other
policies. Clearly the ambition to have all schools in MATs by
2030 is totally unrealistic and so the government must clarify
exactly what it does intend to do. Creating an all-MAT system
would require huge structural change, so if the government is
intent on pursuing this policy it must explain how it intends to
facilitate and support this process to ensure positive outcomes
and avoid schools joining or forming groups which aren’t best
placed to support and challenge them. Getting this underlying
structure right is more important than meeting an arbitrary
deadline.
“If the government insists on pressing ahead with this policy, it
must explain how it is going to delivered. Meanwhile, school and
college leaders are once again left in the dark.”