The Department for Transport (DfT) and National Highways will
need to make difficult decisions in prioritising road
enhancements projects, the National Audit Office said today.
Delays to road projects and inflationary pressures mean that, by
March 2025, National Highways will have undertaken less work on
road enhancements and at a higher cost than originally
planned.
The second Road Investment Strategy, which covers the 5 years
between April 2020 and March 2025, initially set out that
government would spend £27.4 billion on the network. This
included £14.1 billion earmarked for a total of sixty-nine road
enhancement projects (almost double the £7.7 billion budget for
the previous five years). Within these sixty-nine projects were
nine that were classified as ‘Tier 1’ – typically costing more
than £500 million or that are novel, contentious, involve complex
engineering work or detailed consultation with
stakeholders.
However, inflationary pressures, delays to road projects and
changes in government priorities have created risks to the
deliverability, affordability, and value for money of National
Highways’ enhancement portfolio, issues which could be carried
forward into the third road investment period (2025-2030).
In 2021, it became clear that delivery could not be implemented
as planned. DfT reduced the total number of projects (down from
69 to 58) and reduced National Highways' budget for road
enhancements by £3.4 billion (27%). The costs of the projects
remaining in the revised portfolio, however, have continued to
rise. As of September 2022, costs have increased across the
portfolio of projects by approximately £3.3 billion.
While the NAO recognises that National Highways created a £1.16
billion contingency budget to address emerging risks, these funds
will not be able to cover the increased costs. Over half of the
contingency funds were allocated between the setting of the draft
budget in 2018 and the publishing of the delivery plan in 2020.
By July 2022, National Highways had allocated £1.19 billion of
contingency funds, more than the original budget.
In March 2022, National Highways reported that that a third of
projects in the revised plan were at risk of delay, the primary
reason being the difficulty in securing development consent. The
NAO concluded that both National Highways and DfT could have done
more to plan for and manage the potential risks to their
portfolio of enhancement works. In the second Road
Investment Strategy National Highways had planned to obtain
consent for 33 infrastructure projects but by May 2022 had
experienced delays in receiving or applying for development
consent on 12 of the projects. In most of the cases additional
work was required to show how road projects complied with
evolving government policy relating to environmental standards,
with some projects being legally challenged by stakeholders in
relation to their cumulative carbon impact.
In the short-term, NAO has recommended that DfT and National
Highways should, working alongside HM Treasury, develop a
response to the current inflationary pressures, addressing the
implications this will have for the cost of planned projects.
They should also work with other government departments to ensure
that they are taking account of wider government policies; this
will allow development consent applications to be more
efficiently prepared for submission.
In the longer-term, National Highways needs to make further
improvements to its management of risks that could have an impact
upon the delivery of the third Road Investment Strategy.
, the head of the NAO, said:
“The Department for Transport and National Highways put together
an extensive road investment plan that has been unfortunate to
coincide with the COVID-19 pandemic and rising inflation.
Nevertheless, more could have been done to manage risks. Delays
to projects have meant that less work has been delivered than
planned and at a higher cost.
DfT and National Highways must now fully address the rising cost
of its revised portfolio of projects, undertaking a review of all
road plans that it plans to move into the time-period of its
third road strategy (2025-2030). This review must consider if
these projects remain feasible and provide optimal value for
money.”