Commenting on the Government’s remit
letter to the School Teachers’ Review Body (STRB) ahead of
the 2022/23 pay round, Kevin Courtney, Joint General Secretary of the National
Education Union,
said:
“As RPI inflation climbs above 14% and
teachers struggle to cope with the cost-of-living crisis, the
Government's remit to the School Teachers' Review Body confirms
its plans to continue cutting teacher pay in real terms.
“Teachers had already seen the real
value of their pay cut by a fifth since 2010, even before this
year's inflation spike. This year's increase of 5% for most
teachers represented another big real-terms cut to teacher
pay. Teachers need a fully funded, above inflation pay
increase to restore the pay lost in real terms, but the
Government has shown that it has no intention of repairing the
damage to teacher pay.
“Instead of focusing on the impact of
inflation on teachers, the Government's remit letter focuses on
its own inflation target which is currently just 2%. With
RPI inflation predicted to be almost 7% in late 2023 according to
the Treasury's own average of forecasts, a pay increase of 2%
would be another devastating cut to teacher pay. This would
intensify teacher recruitment and retention problems that are
already critical, when the Government should be valuing teachers
and recognising their crucial contribution to economic
recovery.
“Instead of funding the pay increases
teachers need, the Government is cynically using its own
inadequate funding levels to justify more attacks on teacher
pay. Once again, the Government is restricting the STRB's
remit to prevent the objective, evidence-based review of teacher
pay we need - a review that must not be constrained by the
Government's inadequate funding
envelope.
“Years of austerity and pay cuts have
hit teachers and the education service hard, but all this
Government has to offer is more of the same. It has no
evidence to support its political choice to attack teacher
pay. The NEU campaign for the funding that schools need,
and the pay teachers deserve, based on the evidence and the real
lived experiences of teachers, will
continue.”