The government is still developing its understanding of the
complex challenges involved in supporting vulnerable adolescents.
Gaps in knowledge and the lack of a strategic approach mean that
government cannot yet say whether its plans to spend a further
£2bn will address the needs of families, vulnerable adolescents
and children in the most effective way, according to the National
Audit Office (NAO).
There are around 7.3 million adolescents aged 9-19 years in
England. Vulnerable adolescents are at greater risk of
experiencing harm. If these adolescents do not receive effective
support, from whatever source, at the right time, their problems
may become entrenched and require intense and expensive support
to reverse or mitigate any harm. The Independent Review of
Children’s Social Care in 2021 has estimated that the annual
social cost of not addressing the needs of all children who have
ever needed a social worker is around £23 billion.
For the individual, harmful consequences could include mental
health difficulties, periods not being in education, employment
or training, or contact with the criminal justice system. The
different outcomes often overlap, for example around 72% of
children sentenced in 2019-20 were assessed as having mental
health concerns, with 71% having communication concerns. There is
also variation across the country and by ethnicity.
Support for vulnerable adolescents is provided largely by local
bodies. Within central government, the Department for Education
(DfE) is responsible for policy for children’s services and
education, working with six other departments on its objective to
support the most disadvantaged and vulnerable children and young
people so no one is left behind.1 The NAO has
calculated that the 2021 Spending Review announced plans to spend
around £2 billion on a range of additional initiatives which
include support for families, vulnerable adolescents and
children.2
Central government has a limited understanding of how different
risk factors and characteristics combine to cause vulnerability.
Available data shows a mixed picture. Referrals of children to
secondary mental health services increased by 142% between
2016-17 and 2021-22. The number of children cautioned or
sentenced in the criminal justice system fell by 82% (from 85,300
to 15,751) between 2010-11 and 2020-21. Government does not have
the information to fully understand what is driving this change.
Central government has a limited knowledge of whether the same
adolescents are known to or receiving support from different
local services, but has started to try to join up different data
sets.
The NAO found that, while departments work together on programmes
and initiatives, there is no overall strategic assessment of
whether vulnerable adolescents’ needs are being addressed.
Without a strategic approach to planning, there is a risk of gaps
in the provision of support, or that support from different
programmes may overlap.
At local level, there is more to do to improve the effectiveness
of new arrangements aimed at joining up the work of local bodies
involved in safeguarding children and providing support services.
It can be difficult for local bodies to navigate the range of
different government programmes, which can lead to confusion at
the local level.
There is no joined-up assessment of the extent to which
cumulative government interventions have succeeded in improving
outcomes for vulnerable adolescents, and there are gaps in the
evidence base of what works well to support adolescents. There is
some evidence to show what works to prevent youth offending, but
less on how to prevent other adverse outcomes, such as how best
to support those at risk of being taken into care.
The NAO recommends that government should build on recent data
sharing exercises to improve its understanding of risk factors
and adverse outcomes, and should address the gaps in the evidence
base of what works well to support vulnerable adolescents.
“Providing the right support to young people at risk of poor
outcomes is vital to prevent both harm to individuals, and
considerable costs to society, yet gaps in evidence and data mean
the Government does not have the understanding it needs of this
challenge. Without looking again at its approach, government may
not make the best use of the funding it has to improve the
chances of these vulnerable young people.”
, the head of the NAO
Full report: Support for vulnerable
adolescents
Notes for editors
- The six other departments with policies and programmes that
support vulnerable adolescents are The Department for Levelling
Up, Housing and Communities (DLUHC), The Department for Health
and Social Care (DHSC), the Home Office (HO), The Ministry of
Justice (MoJ), Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), and the
Department for Digital, Culture Media and Sport (DCMS).
- The NAO calculates that the 2021 Spending Review announced £2
billion of additional spending which includes initiatives to help
prevent the avoidable costs of adverse outcomes for families,
vulnerable adolescents and children. There
are other existing programmes which provide additional prevention
and support services to vulnerable adolescents such as: Violence
Reduction Units (£170 million over four years 2019/20 to 2022/23)
and the Youth Endowment Fund (£200 million since 2019 over 10
years).