Rising asset prices alongside a long-term stagnation in earnings
have shifted the economic dividing lines. Wealth has grown
rapidly relative to income. The economic prospects of young
generations are struggling to match, let alone exceed, those of
their predecessors. And recent declines in social mobility may
accelerate as inherited wealth becomes an increasingly important
part of lifetime resources. While income remains important, it is
wealth that is increasingly at the heart of the most pressing
economic inequalities today.
These are among the conclusions of new research for the IFS
Deaton Review of Inequalities, funded by the Nuffield Foundation
and published today.
-
Because wealth has been growing much faster than
income, it is becoming harder for working families to save
enough to climb the wealth distribution. In 2008, it
took 10 years’ worth of typical full-time gross earnings to
move from the middle to the top of the wealth distribution. By
2018, this had increased to almost 16 years.
-
The huge growth in house prices has contributed to
collapsing rates of homeownership and is acting to push up the
amount of the country’s wealth held by older
generations.
-
People born in the 1980s have had lower rates of
homeownership than all cohorts born from the 1940s
onwards.
-
- Only 36% of those born in the 1980s were homeowners by
age 30, compared to 55% of those born in the 1970s and over
60% of those born in the 1950s and 1960s.
- Half of middle-income adults in paid work are renting. In
that sense, they are now more like those on the lowest
incomes than those on the highest incomes.
- The difference between the homeownership rates of the
middle (50%) and top (73%) quintiles of the working-age
income distribution has not been greater since consistent
data became available during the 1960s.
-
The pandemic and its aftermath may well have increased
wealth, and wealth inequalities, further. Increases in
saving were greatest for the most well-off and rises in asset
prices also benefited them.
-
Rapid rises in wealth for those who already owned some
wealth has coincided with a long-term stagnation in
earnings. This slow-down in earnings has meant that
younger generations can no longer expect to see greatly
improving living standards as they age. For example, typical
income for those born in the 1940s and 1950s approximately
doubled, in real terms, between their late 20s and early 50s.
Those born in the 1960s saw a rise of around a half from age 25
to 50; on current trends, those born in the 1970s will see a
rise of less than a quarter over 25 years.
-
Today’s intergenerational inequality may be tomorrow’s
lack of social mobility. With large rises in
wealth combining with long-term stagnation of
working-age incomes, inherited wealth is becoming
increasingly important for the lifetime economic resources of
young generations. Parental wealth is becoming more
important in determining how much money you have.
Robert Joyce, Deputy Director of IFS, said: ‘A
generation of Britons has ridden a wave of growing asset prices,
pushing up the value of their houses and investments. Meanwhile,
more than a decade of stagnant earnings has held back younger
generations for whom earning their own economic success has
become increasingly difficult. The fact that we can no longer be
sure that the young will grow up with living standards that match
their predecessors is a remarkable social change.’
Mike Brewer, IFS Research Fellow and Chief Economist of
the Resolution Foundation, said: ‘The rise in household
wealth relative to income is likely to make the UK a less
socially mobile country, and to impede the narrowing of other
longstanding economic inequalities, such as between ethnic
groups. Closing large wealth gaps materially when incomes are
stagnant is extremely difficult.’
Alex Beer, Welfare Programme Head at the Nuffield
Foundation, said: ‘The divide between people with and
without assets and those with and without wealthy parents is
increasing. This divide not only presents a barrier to social
mobility but also increases the risk of divisions within society.
To improve living standards, a holistic approach is required
which addresses wealth inequalities as well as stagnant wages and
the increasing pressures on household spending. Such an agenda
for action will be developed by the IFS Deaton Review of
Inequalities in 2023.’
ENDS
Notes to Editor
Trends in income and wealth inequalities is a report by Pasquale
Bourquin (IFS), Mike Brewer (Resolution Foundation) and Thomas
Wernham (IFS) for the IFS Deaton Review of Inequalities.
Download the embargoed report
here.
This report is embargoed until 0001 Wednesday
9th November. The report will be published using the
URL: https://ifs.org.uk/inequality/trends-in-income-and-wealth-inequalities
This report has been produced as part of the flagship IFS Deaton
Review of Inequalities in the 21st Century, funded by the
Nuffield Foundation. Launched in 2019, this is an ambitious
five-year project, initiated by IFS and funded by the Nuffield
Foundation. With the Nobel Laureate Professor Sir Angus Deaton in
the chair, the panel overseeing the project includes
world-leading experts in sociology, demography, epidemiology,
political science, philosophy and economics. www.ifs.org.uk/inequality.