Boycotts, Divestment
and Sanctions Bill
“Legislation will prevent public bodies engaging in boycotts that
undermine community cohesion.”
The purpose of the Bill is to:
● Deliver the manifesto commitment to stop public bodies from
adopting their own approach to international relations.
The main benefits of the Bill would be:
-
● Ensuring the UK’s foreign policy determines how our
country interacts with other nations, which includes imposing
sanctions where necessary.
-
● Stopping public bodies pursuing their own foreign
policy agenda with public money.
-
● Preventing divisive behaviour that undermines
community cohesion across the country by stopping public
bodies from imposing their own boycott, divestment or
sanctions campaigns. There are concerns that such boycotts
may legitimise and drive antisemitism as these types of
campaigns overwhelmingly target Israel. Such campaigns result
in undue politicisation of public institutions.
The main elements of the Bill are:
Territorial extent and application
● The Bill will extend and apply across the UK.
Key facts
-
● It is a long-standing principle that there may be
restrictions on taxpayer-funded public bodies that do not
apply to private bodies; for example, public bodies cannot
engage in party political campaigning.
-
● It is not acceptable that public bodies carry out
campaigns where attempts are made to declare policies for
boycotts, divestment or sanctions at variance with Government
policy. We have seen motions passed by Lancaster City Council
in support of such campaigns in June 2021 and Leicester City
Council to boycott goods from Israeli settlements in 2014.
-
● The Government has zero tolerance for discrimination.
Such campaigns are not in line with government policy and pit
communities against each other, undermining community
cohesion. Jewish groups have repeatedly challenged public
bodies, including in the courts, that have called for or
attempted boycotts, divestment and sanctions campaigns.
-
● Unofficial boycotts have gone beyond those directed
at a particular state and contribute to the horrific rise in
antisemitism in the UK – including Kosher food being removed
from supermarket shelves, Jewish films being banned from a
film festival and a student union holding a vote on blocking
the formation of a Jewish student society.
-
● Sanctions policy should be determined by the UK
Government. The UK already has a legal framework in the
Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2018 to impose,
update and lift sanctions autonomously.