Source: Greenpeace
The Energy Security Strategy is being introduced at speed in
response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the concern over the
dependence on Russian fossil fuels. Yet if touted policies
briefed to the media come to fruition it will fail in its own
terms. Few of the propositions will reduce UK fossil fuel usage
in the short term, and the emphasis has shifted to nuclear and to
new oil and gas licences, which will not deliver for well over a
decade, and will not be the best measures to reduce bills,
addressing the cost-of-living crisis.
Associated with that, the UN IPCC has flagged up we have *very*
little time left to address the climate crisis because we
continue to over exploit fossil fuels, and waste too much energy.
Whilst there are important short term issues of energy security
these must be solved through delivering CO2 emissions reductions
at the same time, otherwise we swap energy insecurity for climate
insecurity.
This landmark report from world scientists has emphasised the
need to reduce how much energy we use, by cutting energy waste,
and the need to swap harmful fossil fuels for easy-to-deploy
solutions like renewables if we want to stand a chance of
limiting warming to 1.5 degrees. Anything else is a sprint in the
wrong direction.
Big bets on nuclear… a dangerous gamble
- Johnson has trumpeted ‘big bets’ on nuclear,
which is apt because investing in nuclear is quite literally
gambling away taxpayers’ money on projects that are generally
late and represent poor value for money.
- New nuclear is complex, beset by huge delays
and massively (and increasingly) expensive.
- Aside from the much-delayed Hinkley Point C
reactor, which went to final investment decision in 2016 but will
not start generating until 2027 at the earliest, the only viable
nuclear project is Sizewell C. EDF hopes to generate by 2034,
only if there are no further delays, and taking a further 6 years to be
carbon neutral.
- This model of a nuclear reactor, the EPR, is
well over time and budget wherever it is being constructed in
Europe. The only place it actually started working - Taishan in
China - closed in July last year after
a few years of operation and has not restarted.
- Nuclear power also creates hazardous waste for
which there is no long-term solution anywhere. ‘Advanced’ or
‘modular’ reactors aren’t necessarily any better and
they still suffer from weapons
proliferation risks. No Western model of a small modular
reactor has yet been built and so claimed costs are
speculative. The history of nuclear power is that claimed costs
at inception are much higher when reactors are delivered.
- Squeezed households are increasingly likely to
lose out, because the government recently adopted the
controversial 'Regulated Asset Base' funding mechanism. This
allows constructors to share financial risk with consumers with a
levy on bills. In a worst case scenario consumers can pay the
full cost of reactors that are never completed. This happened
with two abandoned reactors planned for South Carolina, where bill
payers are still on the hook for $9 billion.
New fossil fuel licences: 'political and economic
madness', according to the the UN Secretary
General.
-
They’re slow: New oil and gas
licences take on average 28
years to get going, according to the North Sea
Transition Authority’s own figures.
-
It’s not ‘our gas’. Fossil fuels aren’t
nationalised in the UK, so any newly extracted fossil fuels
will most likely be sold to the highest bidder on international
markets.
-
Won’t help bills. As stated by Business
Secretary , Energy
Minister , COP President , and government advisors in
the Climate Change Committee.
-
The ‘wrong’ fuel. North Sea oil
is heavy crude and we
don’t have that kind of refining capacity in the UK. Our
refineries are mostly geared up to use lighter, sweeter oils,
which is a legacy of having the original Brent oil.
Around 80% of the UK’s oil
gets exported.
Not enough wind
Wasting time pandering to fracking fans
The government has launched a scientific review of shale
gas. Instead of wasting time on this it should listen to its
own BEIS department:
"Fracking causes earthquakes, is hated by local communities,
would take 5-10 years to kick-start, and won’t even lower the
price. We need to get real: Lancashire isn't Texas, any shale gas
we do find won't lower the European price, and Cuadrilla aren’t
going to sell their gas below market rate, are they?"
What we need to see: quick and clean solutions, cutting
energy waste, and buy-in from the Treasury and the Department for
Transport too.
Cut home energy waste: Quickest and smartest way to get
off gas and tackle high bills
Quick, clean and cheap renewables
- 649 UK onshore wind and solar projects,
which already have planning
permission. If they all went ahead, they'd save more
gas than we currently import from Russia
- Government must ramp up onshore wind and
solar so they are well over doubled by
2030 making sure all the barriers in place are
removed, and ensuring support from and for communities
affected. Accelerate the offshore wind project pipeline,
including a coordinated offshore grid, and ensuring development
is delivered in harmony with nature and biodiversity
-
Gear-up the Grid. We need a smart energy
grid fit for the 21st century. A grid that shares energy
between European countries to make sure we all can cleanly
power our economies and has better storage, including clean
hydrogen, and flexible demand to securely deal with the shifts
in energy production and consumption coming down the
line.
- Handling variability in renewables output can
be done through interconnection, demand management and storage
through technologies like green hydrogen. Australia has shown
it can be rolled out incredibly quickly, and has already got an
agreement in place to export green hydrogen to Germany in 2024.
Get real on green jobs.
Don’t forget: petrol and diesel is energy
-
Large scale public transport improvements
- Government must level the playing field, so
that every town has public transport operating to minimum
standards like in Switzerland, with at least an hourly bus
service, operating seven days a week. Make all new buses
zero-emission from 2025 and bring in Oyster-card or
contactless ticketing in all major cities. Make public
transport free of charge, starting off with bus travel and
prioritising those on the lowest incomes
-
A plan to go big on walking and cycling
- Government must increase funding in
England to at least £6 billion over the next five years. Local
authorities and mayors in all major urban areas should create
networks of low-traffic neighbourhoods. Give priority to
pedestrians and cyclists along main roads by widening
pavements, introducing cycle lanes, removing car parking
spaces.
-
A behaviour change campaign to lower the use of
private transport fuel - as the International Energy
Agency suggested last month; reduce motorway speeds,
encourage greater working from home, enhance car sharing, avoid
business travel including flying through alternatives,
introduce frequent flyer levy to bear down on excess flying and
stop airport expansion