The Electoral Reform Society have called time on the
‘undemocratic anomaly’ of devolution in England in a major new
report addressing the democratic deficit in English local
government.
The report, Democracy Made in England, sets out a number
of proposals for real devolution of powers – outlining the
principles and values that should underpin any devolution plans
to put citizens, not Westminster, at the heart of decision making
on how communities are governed.
The ERS also set out a series of concrete reforms calling for a
clear framework for devolving power to local authorities,
reforming English local government elections with proportional
representation and the creation of an elected House of Lords with
representation from all nations, regions and localities of the
UK.
The report comes as new ERS survey data reveal over two thirds
(68%) of local councillors in England feel they do not have
sufficient powers to represent the needs of their communities and
65% believe local people should be more involved in decision
making.
In a survey of almost 800 local representatives from across
England conducted as part of the research for Democracy Made
in England, the ERS found growing support for moving the
balance of power away from Westminster and to communities across
the country.
Exclusive new ERS survey research shows [1]:
- Over two-thirds (68%) of local representatives feel they do
not have sufficient powers to represent the needs of their
community.
- 70% called for decisions to be made in partnership between
the national and local levels and implemented locally
- 65% of local representatives think citizens should be more
involved in making decisions about their local area
The ERS are calling for parties to back new proposals for
an overhaul of English local government – with a plan for genuine
and democratic devolution underpinned by principles and values
that put communities, not Westminster, in the driving
seat.
The Society have issued the call to reform local democracy in
England – one of the most centralised countries in Europe as
measured by the local control of resources and the
over-dependence on Whitehall decision making.
The report comes just weeks after the long-awaited Levelling Up
White Paper which includes devolution and empowering local
leaders and communities as one of its 12 missions for ‘levelling
up’ left-behind areas. [2]
The Society argue that existing approaches to devolution and
local government reform have been too focussed on economic
factors and efficiency, and are calling for a new
approach focused on democracy and empowerment and guided
by a clear set of principles and values that respect the
democratic importance of local government and the vital role
played by citizens themselves.
Dr Jess Garland, Director of Policy and Research,
Electoral Reform Society said:
“England remains one of the most centralised nations in Europe.
While the centres of power in the rest of the UK have shifted
away from Westminster over the last two decades, for England
these changes have been limited.
“Too often any transfer of decision making-powers has come as an
afterthought – little has been done to genuinely empower local
government or the communities in which people live.
“This report begins to set out how a new relationship between
national and local government can be created.
“It cannot be left for Westminster to decide how local
communities should see themselves and how they should be
governed, but to set out how those communities can choose their
own governance, how citizens can themselves reinvigorate local
democracy.
“Now is the time to rebuild our local democracy but, to do that,
England can no longer be an afterthought.”
Michela Palese, Research and Policy Officer, Electoral
Reform Society, who authored the report said:
“Devolution is a journey. There is no single
path that local areas in England can or
should take to achieve it.
“As we saw during the pandemic, it is our local councils that are
on the front line of so many of the issues that face our
communities – yet, as we've found, too often our local
representatives find themselves powerless in the face of
Westminster's centralising control.
“We must give areas real power and autonomy from the centre to
ensure that people themselves – whether local representatives or
citizens – are brought back into the process and have the
opportunity to make their own decisions.
“England needs to rediscover genuine local self-government, with
democracy, representation, and place at its heart – we need
political leadership and commitment to deliver true democracy for
England.”
Full Recommendations:
Principles
-
Subsidiarity: decisions should be taken at,
and power and resources devolved to, the lowest possible level.
-
Transparency and openness: there should be
transparency around the process of devolution so that local
communities are informed and engaged.
-
Autonomy: local areas should have the autonomy
to act in the best interests of the communities they serve.
-
Accountability and democratic responsiveness:
Devolution should ensure that local accountability and
democratic responsiveness to citizens is enhanced.
-
Democratic legitimacy: structures of local
government and devolution should be recognised as
democratically legitimate by the communities they
serve.
-
Trust: the relationship between the centre and
the localities should be based on trust, with the centre having
confidence in local areas to make their own decisions.
-
Equality and partnership: the relationship
between the centre and localities should be based on equality
and collaboration.
-
Diversity: a flourishing local democracy
ensures that a wide range of voices and views are heard, and
enables diverse groups to be represented.
Values
-
An empowered local government: local
government needs to be valued as a meaningful, recognised
governance structure, with real power and autonomy. Powers,
funding, and capacity need to be transferred away from
Whitehall and down into local communities.
-
Valuing place: approaches to devolution need
to be place-sensitive – the strength of local
government is the link it provides to place and local
leadership.
-
Citizen engagement: citizen involvement should
be an essential value underpinning devolution in England –
solutions cannot be imposed top-down, but rather should be
built up from the local level and enjoy people’s support and
legitimacy.
The report also contains a number of concrete policies
reform to put into action the principles and values
including:
-
Establishing a devolution framework:
Devolution should be the default position. A new framework
should be set out which clarifies the aims and purpose of
devolution, centred on a presumption in favour of democracy and
local self-determination.
-
Reforming English local government
elections: Proportional representation for
English local government would help reinvigorate democracy at
the local level, ending the proliferation of one-party states
and single-party domination of council chambers, and opening up
councils to a diversity of voices.
-
Improving relations between the centre and
localities: New mechanisms for both
vertical (between the centre and localities) and horizontal
(across local government) relations should be created to ensure
local areas are represented in the national arena and are
empowered to coordinate with one another – including a fairly
elected second chamber in Westminster to allow for the fair and
equal representation of the UK’s nations, regions and
localities.
-
A pathway to reform: For
devolution to truly work and be implemented effectively, there
needs to be a genuine commitment to let go of power at the
centre – devolution should be seen as a positive end in itself.
Bottom-up citizen involvement will be necessary to ensure the
legitimacy of, and trust in, any new institutional set-up and
democracy more broadly.
ENDS
Notes to Editors
[1] ERS survey conducted from 25 January 2022 until 14 February
2022 and received 781 responses.
Question 1: Which party, if any, do you
represent?
|
|
Number of responses
|
% of total
|
|
Conservative
|
254
|
32.5%
|
|
Labour
|
199
|
25.5%
|
|
Liberal Democrat
|
150
|
19.2%
|
|
Green
|
70
|
9.0%
|
|
Independent/no party or group affiliation
|
91
|
11.7%
|
|
Other (including local groups)
|
17
|
2.2%
|
|
Total
|
781
|
100%
|
NB: Components may not sum to total due to
rounding.
Question 2: Thinking about your experience of local
government in England, what comes closest to your
view?
|
|
Number of responses
|
% of total
|
|
I have enough power to represent the needs of my local
community
|
237
|
30.5%
|
|
I do not have enough power to represent the needs of my
local community
|
526
|
67.6%
|
|
Don’t know
|
15
|
1.9%
|
|
Total
|
778
|
100%
|
Question 3: When it comes to where decisions are made
to address the needs of your local area, what comes closest to
your view?
|
|
Number of responses
|
% of total
|
|
Decisions should be made entirely at the national level and
implemented locally
|
4
|
0.5%
|
|
Decisions should be made at the national level with some
local input, and implemented locally
|
20
|
2.6%
|
|
Decisions should be made in partnership between the
national and local levels and implemented locally
|
547
|
70.1%
|
|
Decisions should be made entirely at the local level and
implemented locally
|
208
|
26.7%
|
|
Don’t know
|
1
|
0.1%
|
|
Total
|
780
|
100%
|
Question 4: When it comes to citizens being involved
in making decisions about their local area, what comes closest to
your view about how things work in your
area?
|
|
Number of responses
|
% of total
|
|
Citizens should be more involved in making decisions about
their local area
|
504
|
64.7%
|
The extent of citizen involvement in decision making about
their local area is about right
|
259
|
33.2%
|
Citizens should be less involved in making decisions about
their local area
|
9
|
1.2%
|
|
Don’t know
|
7
|
0.9%
|
|
Total
|
779
|
100%
|
[2] https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/levelling-up-the-united-kingdom
Report and Executive Summary attached