Commenting on new research published today by the National
Foundation for Educational Research (NFER), funded by the
Nuffield Foundation, Kevin Courtney, Joint General
Secretary of the National Education Union,
said:
“The findings of this research chime with what NEU members
report, and with the findings of the recent Independent
Assessment Commission (IAC). The consensus established by the IAC
found that a tired, outdated, oversized curriculum leaves little
opportunity for the development of the types of skills this NFER
research has highlighted will be important for future life and
work.
“The OECD reports, along with plentiful other research evidence,
that England is an outlier internationally in this sense and only
moving further in the wrong direction. When assessment is
entirely via written exam then of course teaching and learning
has to focus on retention and regurgitation of knowledge at the
expense of other important things, including the development of
essential skills.
“The research highlights that to help current and future students
flourish in the 21st century, England must change its approach to
assessment and qualifications. If no change to assessment is
made, these problems will persist.
“If assessment were more varied, to ensure it considered more
than just how much you can remember, the curriculum could be
improved to be more diverse and relevant. The IAC’s New ERA
vision and principles give a framework for this: one which values
oracy and other assessment methods beyond just written exams. A
national conversation to improve assessment in this way is needed
urgently.”