Regulators, government and Parliament must do more to ensure
joined-up and effective regulation of the rapidly changing
digital world, a new House of Lords report says.
Systems are not rigorous or accountable enough to address
regulatory gaps and overlaps, according to the House of
Lords Communications and Digital Committee which says
that better processes as well as regulators, industry and experts
working more closely together are needed to deal with emerging
challenges such as artificial intelligence advances.
A new Digital Regulation Co-operation Forum (DRCF) is “a small
step” but a lack of overarching coordination and oversight of
regulatory objectives remains, the committee says in a report published today (13
December).
While welcoming the DRCF’s collaborative work so far, the
committee is concerned that it lacks robust systems to coordinate
objectives and to sort out potential conflicts between different
regulators as the workload expands. More measures are needed to
boost the DRCF’s long-term effectiveness and accountability, the
committee believes.
The committee recommends that an independent chair of the DRCF be
appointed to resolve conflicts between regulators and to be
accountable to Parliament.
, chair of the committee,
said:
“Persistent challenges remain that the regulatory system
is insufficiently equipped to confront.
“We called for more joined-up regulation and more
resources as far back as 2019 and although the DRCF is a step in
the right direction it doesn’t meet the challenges we
face.
“We are concerned that not all regulators with digital
interests and expertise have a seat at the table.
“Sharing information between regulators, advisory bodies,
government, industry and experts needs to be enhanced to avoid
duplication and ensure that the greatest range of perspectives
feed into regulation.”
The committee wants to see a new committee of MPs and peers set
up to oversee digital regulation.
added:
“Given the pace of technological change and its impact
across society and the economy, there is a notable gap in
Parliamentary oversight.”