- Less than half of people in big cities can reach their city
centre quickly by public transport
- Poor urban transport costs the UK more than £23
billion per year
- Planning changes needed alongside infrastructure investment
to improve connections
The £5.7 billion promised in the Budget is not alone enough to
level up urban transport says Centre for Cities in new research
finding that just four in 10 people in the UK’s largest cities*
outside London can reach their city centre by public transport in
under 30 minutes.
This is significantly worse than in big European cities where
almost seven in 10 people can travel to their city centre in less
than 30 minutes. It severely limits people’s job opportunities
and effectively makes our largest cities much smaller than their
European competitors.
While promised an ‘infrastructure
revolution’ in last week’s Budget, poor infrastructure is rarely
the only cause of urban transport problems. The main reason is
that more people in European cities such as Bordeaux or Berlin
live in well-connected midrise suburbs close to the centre than
in detached, car-dependent UK suburbs.
More people living around public transport stops in European
cities means their systems are more viable than the UK, where
bureaucratic planning rules make it almost impossible build homes
in well-connected suburbs.
The economic cost of this is huge: £23.1 billion per year that
could be spent on levelling up. These missed billions are almost
equivalent to the UK Government’s entire transport budget and
more than it spends on the Home Office, international
development, culture, or foreign affairs.**
|
City
|
Productivity gap, due to weak public transport
accessibility
|
|
Manchester
|
£8.9 billion
|
|
Birmingham
|
£3.6 billion
|
|
Leeds
|
£2.8 billion
|
|
Sheffield
|
£2.3 billion
|
|
Bristol
|
£1.7 billion
|
|
Newcastle
|
£1.7 billion
|
|
Nottingham
|
£1 billion
|
|
Liverpool
|
£936 million
|
|
Glasgow
|
£137 million
|
|
Combined lost productivity
|
£23.1 billion
|
|
Source: Traveltime; ONS; Eurostat; Centre for Cities’
calculations. Estimates based on PUA boundaries, which
may be affecting the analysis by including some towns
that will be unlikely to be connected by new public
transport.
|
Any attempt by the Government to fix this problem by investing in
transport infrastructure will fail if it doesn’t also make
substantial planning reforms to build midrise new neighbourhoods
closer to city centres.
To improve public transport in big cities and add around
£23 billion to the national economy the Government should build
on its investments in the Budget by:
-
Continuing to invest in new infrastructure
where it is needed such as Manchester and Leeds.
-
Reforming the planning system to make it
easier to build midrise new neighbourhoods in well-connected
suburbs.
-
Encouraging councils to implement Local Development
Orders – a little used tool to get more homes built.
Centre for Cities’ Chief Executive said:
“Last week the Chancellor promised an ‘infrastructure revolution’
and the money being given to city-regions is much-needed.
However, it will not be enough to level up transport while
suburbs remain so sparse and car-dependent. Just half of
neighbourhoods built more than one home in the last decade.
“To maximise benefits of infrastructure spending, and make new
routes and regular services more viable, the Government needs to
commit to significant reforms to the planning system to allow our
cities’ suburbs to grow.
“We know that planning reform is controversial, but without it
the Government’s investment on urban transport won’t level up. On
the other hand, coupling the investment with planning reform will
add more than £23 billion to the economy.”
Ends
Notes to editors
*The cities included in this study are Leeds, Manchester,
Sheffield, Bristol, Newcastle, Nottingham, Liverpool, Birmingham
and Glasgow.
**Source: Institute for Government
analysis of HM Treasury, Public Expenditure Statistical
Analyses 2019.