The Green Homes Grant Voucher Scheme was delivered to an
over-ambitious timetable and was not executed to an acceptable
standard, significantly limiting its impact on job creation and
carbon reduction.
The Government has identified decarbonising home heating as a key
part of its plan to deliver net zero by 2050.1Between
September 2020 and March 2021, as part of government's ‘green
recovery' from the COVID-19 pandemic, the Department for
Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (the Department) ran
the Green Homes Grant Voucher Scheme (the scheme). The scheme
offered homeowners up to £5,000 funding, or £10,000 for
low-income households, for the installation of energy efficient
improvements.
The Department originally expected the scheme to support up to
82,500 jobs over six months, and enable up to 600,000 households
to save up to £600 on their energy bills. The scheme did not
deliver the expected number of energy efficiency home
installations, or support the expected number of jobs. In total,
the Department estimates that it will spend £314 million of the
£1.5 billion funding available, of which £50.5 million (more than
£1,000 per home upgraded) is on administration. It forecasts that
the scheme will eventually support efficiency measures in 47,500
homes, and create up to 5,600 jobs over 12 months.
Many homeowners and installers had a poor experience using the
scheme. There were delays issuing vouchers to homeowners and
paying installers, causing frustration. Homeowners also found it
challenging completing applications, and were often asked for
more information, which took time. From October 2020 to April
2021, over 3,000 complaints were made to the Department and the
scheme administrator.
HM Treasury gave the Department an over-ambitious 12-week
timescale to design the scheme, consult with stakeholders and
procure an administrator. This came at a time when the Department
was supporting vaccine procurement, and undertaking activities
related to EU Exit. The Department accepted that delivering the
scheme within this timescale posed a high risk, but judged it was
justified by the need to support businesses in the wake of the
COVID-19 pandemic.
The Department did not sufficiently understand the challenges
facing installers, failing to learn from its own previous energy
schemes. Other energy schemes have shown the need for a robust
evaluation of stakeholders' views.2 The Department
only consulted with installers after the scheme was announced,
which limited the opportunities to include installer views in the
scheme design. The costs of installer accreditation and the short
duration of the scheme when it was first announced (six months)
deterred some installers from participating.
The Department did not fully manage the tension between
maximising long-term reductions in carbon emissions, and creating
jobs in the short-term. The scheme focused on measures that would
provide the biggest impact on reducing carbon, such as insulation
and low-carbon heat installations. These require specialist
skills to install, which meant it took some time for employers to
take-on and train staff. Jobs might have been created more
quickly in areas that require less specialist skills, such as
window and door installation. The initial plan for a two-year
scheme would have allowed more time for jobs to be created, but
this was rejected by HM Treasury.
The Department chose to proceed to its timetable, even though
none of the firms that bid for the grant administration contract
thought it was possible to fully implement the required digital
voucher application system in the time available. ByMarch 2021,
the required system was still not in place, and much more manual
processing was required for applications than expected,
contributing to a growing backlog. The Department decided to
close the scheme in March 2021, reasoning that insufficient
improvement had been made, and that existing voucher applications
would fully use the £320m provided by HM Treasury for the next
financial year.
The NAO recommends the Department should engage properly with the
supplier market for future decarbonisation schemes, and base its
planning on a realistic assessment of how long it will take the
market to mobilise. The requirements placed on homeowners and
installers for such schemes should be tested from the start, with
the aim of simplifying administration.
, the head of
the NAO said:
"The aim to achieve immediate economic stimulus through the Green
Homes Grant voucher scheme meant that it was rushed. As a result,
its benefits for carbon reduction were significantly reduced and
ultimately, it did not create the number of jobs government had
hoped for.
"Decarbonising our homes is a key element of the government's net
zero strategy. It is vital that future schemes learn from this
experience"
- ENDS
-
Notes for
Editors
-
In June 2019, the government passed
legislation committing to achieve net zero by 2050.The NAO has
reported on government's environmental strategy in Achieving net-zero (December 2020) and
Achieving government's long-term environmental
goals (November 2020).