A new
report published today by the National Foundation for
Educational Research (NFER), on the on-going impact of Covid-19
on schools serving predominantly deprived populations, shows how
schools are adapting their curriculum to help pupils’ learning
recovery.
It also finds that pupils moving between Early Years, Reception
and Year 1 are less emotionally and academically ready to make
the transition, compared to previous years, and that many pupils
moving from primary to secondary school are emotionally
underprepared.
The report, funded by the Nuffield Foundation, expands on NFER’s
interim policy
briefing published in July. It provides more detailed
information on a decline in pupils’ wellbeing and mental health,
especially increased anxiety, as a result of the pandemic, and
highlights senior school leaders' calls for urgent increases in
Government funding for specialist mental health and social care
services to support pupils’ wellbeing.
This new report provides further insights into schools’ support
for the recovery of learning and wellbeing once pupils returned
to school full-time from March 2021. It also highlights their
challenges and support needs. It is based on in-depth interviews
with senior leaders in 50 mainstream primary and secondary
schools across England, predominantly serving deprived
populations. We know from our previous work and other evidence
that these schools and pupils have been most seriously affected
by the pandemic.
Key findings from the report (not explored in the July
policy briefing) include:
- Most senior leaders said that their schools had modified the
curriculum to help pupils recover and make progress with their
learning. The research identified four models: narrow
(prioritising literacy and numeracy over other subjects such as
arts and languages); focused (prioritising core content within
subjects); blended (supporting numeracy and literacy through
other subjects); and continuous (covering planned content over a
longer period of time). Schools adopting the narrow model had
done so because of the perceived pressure of external
accountability.
- There were particular worries about children moving into
Nursery, Reception and Year 1 in 2021/22 because the pandemic has
affected such a large proportion of their lives. Some school
leaders were concerned about the emotional readiness of pupils
moving from primary to secondary school, and the academic
readiness of pupils in Years 11-13 to progress to the next stage.
These concerns were exacerbated by disruption to normal
transition events.
Other findings of note include:
- Most school leaders reported more pupil wellbeing and mental
health problems than usual, especially increased anxiety, as a
result of the pandemic. A substantial minority – mainly, but not
exclusively, secondary leaders – noted an increase in severe
mental health issues, including self-harm. Many of those affected
had been identified as vulnerable before the pandemic, but
leaders were also concerned about pupils with no known
vulnerability or previous mental health issues. More primary
pupils than usual were reported to be struggling with social
skills, confidence and self-esteem. There were also concerns
about a deterioration in their skills for learning, such as
concentration, memory and stamina.
- Schools were finding it very difficult to secure specialist
external support. School leaders responded by increasing their
own pastoral support and wellbeing activities, including working
with other organisations. Some had arranged mental health
training and appointed specialist staff, but others were
constrained by a lack of funds, capacity and expertise. Leaders
called for early intervention and a multi-agency approach to
reduce an escalation in poor mental health and learning
incapacity, to support families, and to minimise staff workload
and stress.
The report makes the following recommendations.
-
Recovery measures should balance support for wellbeing
and academic ‘catch up’. The Government needs to
provide adequate, sustained funding for recovery in future, and
enable senior leaders sufficient flexibility to provide
targeted support for wellbeing and enrichment as well as
academic ‘catch up’. This will enable schools to support pupils
appropriately, according to their needs, especially those at
key transition points.
-
A range of urgent measures are needed to tackle
widening educational inequality. There is growing
evidence that the pandemic has increased inequality. Measures
needed to address this include:
- a systematic digital access plan (especially as more schools
move homework, revision and feedback online). In the medium term,
there is a need for government and schools to continue providing
devices and connectivity to pupils who have no remote access. The
Government also needs to find a longer-term solution to the
digital divide.
- a renewed focus on supporting vulnerable children and young
people, including those with special educational needs and
disabilities (SEND).
- recognition within the accountability system (especially
National Curriculum Assessments and Ofsted inspections) that
schools’ experiences, and those of their pupils, have been
unevenly impacted by the pandemic and that the effects are likely
to be felt for a number of years. In addition, allowance should
be made within the 2022 exam series (and consideration of this in
future years) in recognition of the fact that while the vast
majority of pupils have missed classroom learning, some pupils
have missed more than others.
-
Immediate increased funding to address pupils’
wellbeing and mental health – both for schools and for
specialist services, such as Child and Adolescent Mental Health
Services (CAMHS). Schools should continue to monitor and
support pupils’ wellbeing in the coming months and years,
including during the transition back to more normal school
operations from September 2021.
-
Schools will need to prepare for the potential return
of Covid protective measures and/or periods of remote
learning. Although the intention is that schools will
resume normal operations from September, this will become
necessary if there are increases in rates of within-school
transmission, or new Covid-19 variants. The
DfE has issued guidance to schools on how to determine whether
protective measures may be needed, by recommending thresholds
and courses of action. However, the guidance places
decision-making in the hands of schools and local public health
teams. It may be that more centralised directives are needed if
there is a surge in within-school transmission. Ofqual should
also have a ‘Plan B’ in place for examinations in 2022,
outlining how pupils will be assessed if exams have to be
cancelled.
Caroline Sharp, Research Director at NFER, and co-author
of the report said:
“Our report shows the continuing impact of the pandemic on
mainstream schools serving deprived communities, and its adverse
effect on pupils’ wellbeing, learning and transition across all
age groups.
“Schools are doing all they can to support their pupils, whose
education and welfare has been so severely disrupted by Covid-19.
Most are modifying the curriculum to help pupils recover missed
learning, and simultaneously make progress. More research is
needed to understand the implications of the various curriculum
modification models identified in this research.”
Ruth Maisey, Education Programme Head at the Nuffield
Foundation said:
“This NFER research reveals that most school leaders report a
deterioration in pupils’ wellbeing, especially increased anxiety,
as a result of the pandemic. And that without early intervention,
there is a risk these difficulties will escalate, potentially
leading to more severe mental health issues and affecting pupils’
learning in the longer term. The research also finds that
headteachers are having difficulty trying to secure the external,
professional support needed to help pupils with the challenges
they face, highlighting the need for recovery measures to support
children’s wellbeing as well as academic ‘catch up’.”