The Secretary of State for the Home Department (Priti Patel): In
the wake of the tragic shootings in Plymouth on 12 August, my
heartfelt condolences are with the family and friends of those who
lost their lives—Maxine Davison, Lee and Sophie Martyn, Stephen
Washington, and Kate Shepherd—as well as with those that were
injured and the people who witnessed this truly terrible event. The
Home Office and the Ministry of Justice are working closely with
Devon and Cornwall Police and with...Request free trial
The Secretary of State for the Home Department ():
In the wake of the tragic shootings in Plymouth on 12 August,
my heartfelt condolences are with the family and friends of those
who lost their lives—Maxine Davison, Lee and Sophie Martyn, Stephen
Washington, and Kate Shepherd—as well as with those that were
injured and the people who witnessed this truly terrible
event.
The Home Office and the Ministry of Justice are working
closely with Devon and Cornwall Police and with victims’ services
to ensure that those affected by this tragedy, including bereaved
families, have all the support they need.
We must do all that we possibly can to avoid something like
this happening again.
The UK has some of the strictest gun control legislation in
the world and comparatively low levels of gun crime. Yet while
tragedies like last Thursday’s are rare, their impact is profound.
We constantly assess what sensible and proportionate steps we can
take to help prevent such terrible loss of life.
This is now the subject of an ongoing police investigation,
and the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) is looking at
actions taken by Devon and Cornwall Police in relation to issuing a
firearms licence, so it would be inappropriate to comment further
on these matters while that work is ongoing.
However, as a matter of urgency, I have asked every police
force in England, Wales, and Scotland to review their current
firearms licensing processes—in particular the processes that they
follow for returning a certificate—and ensure they are appropriate
as set against the current Home Office guidance and legislation.
This current guidance asks chief officers to ensure high-risk
decisions are approved at a sufficiently senior level. Such
decisions include granting a certificate following a previous
refusal or revocation, including by another force; where there is
evidence of violence, domestic abuse or medical unsuitability; or
where concerns have been raised by someone known to the licence
holder.
The Government keep firearms licensing controls under
constant review. The Home Office is bringing forward new statutory
guidance to improve how people applying for a firearms licence are
assessed in future. The new guidance draws on previous lessons
learned and will ensure better consistency and improved standards
across police firearms licensing departments. It will mean that
that no one is given a firearms licence unless their doctor has
confirmed to the police whether or not they have any relevant
medical conditions, including an assessment of their mental health,
and it will make explicit that firearms applicants may be subject
to social media checks. The police will have a legal duty to
consider the new statutory guidance when it is published. We plan
to publish this new guidance in the coming weeks. We will keep the
new statutory guidance under review, especially in light of this
terrible incident, and we will update it as necessary in due
course.
The police have not declared this to be a terrorist incident.
Investigations into Davison’s motives for committing these terrible
attacks continue. Whether or not an incident is determined to be
terrorism-related is a decision made independently of the
Government by the police, based on the specific circumstances and
what the police find during the investigation.
The UK has one of the most robust counter-terrorism
frameworks in the world. Our definition of terrorism includes an
act or the threat of serious violence to advance an ideological,
religious, racial, or political cause. The Terrorism Act 2000
definition is sufficiently broad to capture modern causes of
terrorism, including “incel” violence. It is this definition that
is applied when determining whether specific individuals are
engaging in terrorism and if incidents should be classified as a
terrorist attack.
This appalling event has shaken the whole country, and in
particular the people of Plymouth. Our hearts go out to them. This
is something which no community and nobody should have to endure. I
would also like to thank those police officers and others who
attended the scene for their incredible bravery.