New Report warns that 5G roll-out risks repeating legacy of mobile ‘not-spots’
|
The DCMS Committee is warning the Government that it risks failing
to meet its revised-down target for gigabit-capable broadband in
the face of considerable challenges to infrastructure roll-out.
Evidence to the Broadband and the road to 5G inquiry found little
confidence that nationwide gigabit-capable broadband by 2025 could
be delivered and “no genuine belief" within the sector that it was
achievable. Challenged on the target throughout the inquiry,
Ministers...Request free trial
The DCMS Committee is warning the Government that it risks failing to meet its revised-down target for gigabit-capable broadband in the face of considerable challenges to infrastructure roll-out.
Evidence to the Broadband and the road to 5G
inquiry found little
confidence that nationwide gigabit-capable broadband by 2025
could be delivered and “no genuine belief" within the sector that
it was achievable. Challenged on the target throughout the
inquiry, Ministers reassured the Committee of the Government’s
commitment to it, however, within weeks of these appearances
before MPs, the Government abandoned its commitment to nationwide
gigabit-capable broadband by 2025, aiming instead for 85%
coverage by that date. MPs also flag concerns that only 25% of the Government’s £5 billion to support roll-out to the hardest-to-reach premises will be made available during this period. The Report finds the Government's target for majority 5G coverage by 2027 ‘equally ambitious’, given rulings banning the use of equipment by high-risk vendors. MPs warn that its roll-out risks repeating the legacy of mobile 'not-spots'. DCMS Committee Chair Julian Knight MP said: “The Government’s decision to abandon its 2025 gigabit-capable broadband target within weeks of Ministers reassuring us of their commitment to it was a belated recognition that it was unrealistic and unachievable, underlining concerns we’d heard from industry. “Valuable time has been lost, making meeting even the revised-down target a major challenge. “On 5G, the Government’s target to deliver to the majority of the population, rather than the majority of the country, risks repeating the same errors that led to mobile ‘not-spots’ with investors cherry-picking areas of high population and leaving people in remote rural areas without a hope. ” ENDS The inquiry examined Government targets, funding and legislative measures intended to enable industry to deliver next generation connectivity at a quicker pace. Key Recommendations to Government:
(Full list of conclusions and recommendations in attached Report) Government abandoned targets MPs express surprise at the Government’s decision to abandon its intention to deliver nationwide gigabit-capable broadband by 2025, announced in November’s Spending Review. The long-awaited National Infrastructure Strategy instead outlined that the Government was "working with industry to target a minimum of 85% gigabit capable coverage by 2025”. However, the Report raises doubts over whether the new revised-down target to deliver gigabit-capable broadband to 85% of the country by 2025 is realistic. MPs express concern that the remaining 15% of the country that will not receive gigabit-capable connections by 2025 are most likely to be rural areas and in the devolved nations. Appearing before MPs in October, DCMS Secretary Oliver Dowden said the Department was "straining every sinew" to meet the target. The Digital Minister Matt Warman later told the Committee he was "absolutely confident" that the Government was doing everything it could to reach it. However, neither were willing to give a clear indication of how likely the target was to be met. The Report notes, Ministers should be ready to respond openly, in answering questions from members of a Select Committee, accepting that a target will not be met when they already possess sufficient information to know that it is not going to be achieved. Evidence to the Committee highlighted major challenges in delivering UK-wide connectivity within the timescale set. While welcoming the decision by Ministers to listen to those concerns, the Report questions the extent to which both the new target and its likely implications have been fully considered in consultation with industry. Financial support for hardest-to-reach areas scaled back The Report finds the decision to scale back the distribution of £5 billion funding for gigabit-capable broadband in the hardest-to-reach premises will undermine the ambition for better connectivity across the country. MPs are disappointed that around only 25% of the funding committed to support the roll-out of gigabit-capable broadband to these premises will be made available by 2025. Evidence taken before the funding cut was announced raised doubts about whether the total £5bn sum would be enough to meet the Government’s aim of delivering gigabit broadband to the hardest to reach 20% of premises. 5G target risks repeating mistakes of mobile ‘not-spots’ MPs raise concerns that the Government’s target to provide 5G to 35 million people by 2027 is based on delivery to the majority of the population, rather than the majority of the UK's landmass. The focus on population numbers means the 5G roll-out risks following the same pattern experienced with previous mobile generations, leaving parts of the country with poorer mobile connectivity and so exacerbating the digital divide. The Report calls for the Government to do more to ensure rural areas do not get left behind. The Committee heard evidence that private investors had prioritised densely populated urban areas, where economies of scale were achievable and the cost of network roll-out could be reduced. O2 told MPs that "the challenge the industry is most likely to face will be a lack of return on investment in more remote and sparsely populated areas, where the cost and challenge of delivering connectivity is at its greatest and the numbers of customers are low". Legislation to ban the use of Huawei equipment is expected to result in a delay of two to three years of 5G roll-out with costs of up to £2bn. The Report notes:
Background:
|
