PM's opening remarks on lockdown regulations debate - Nov 4
Mr Speaker, I beg to move that these Regulations are approved and
that we come together today to implement time-limited restrictions
across England from midnight, so we can contain the Autumn surge of
the virus, protect our NHS and save many lives. Of course, this not
something that any of us wanted to do. None of us came into
politics to tell people once again to shutter their shops, To
furlough their staff, or stay away from their friends and family.
And...Request free trial
Mr Speaker, I beg to move that these Regulations are approved
and that we come together today to implement time-limited
restrictions across England from midnight,
so we can contain the Autumn surge of the virus,
protect our NHS and save many lives.
Of course, this not something that any of us wanted to do.
None of us came into politics to tell people once again to
shutter their shops,
To furlough their staff,
or stay away from their friends and family.
And I feel the pain and anxiety that we all share in the month
ahead.
But as Prime Minister,
when I am confronted with data that projects our NHS could even
collapse,
with deaths in this second wave potentially exceeding those of
the first;
and when I look at what is happening now amongst some of our
continental friends
and see doctors who have tested positive being ordered alas to
work on covid wards,
and patients airlifted to hospitals in some other countries
simply to make space,
I can reach only one conclusion: I am not prepared to take the
risk with the lives of the British people.
And I know, Mr Speaker, it might be tempting to think that
because some progress has been made
we just need to stay the course and see through our locally led
approach.
And it is true that the extraordinary efforts of millions across
the country
they have made a difference, Mr Speaker suppressing the R, the
reproduction rate of the virus below where it would have
otherwise have been
And I want to record again my thanks again to the millions who
have put up with local restrictions,
and I want to thank the local leaders who have understood the
gravity of the position.
But I am sorry to say that the number of Covid patients in some
hospitals is already higher than at the peak of the first wave.
Even in the South West, which has so far had lower case rates
than most of the rest of the country, hospital admissions are
over half way to their first wave peak.
SAGE’s latest analysis, published on Friday, suggests that the R
remains above 1 in every part of England,
which means the virus is continuing to grow among the population.
And every day that the number is above one, is another day that
the number of cases will rise
locking in, more hospital admissions and alas more fatalities.
and pushing the NHS ever closer to the moment when it cannot
cope.
The course we have before us is to prevent the R from going back
remaining above one and to get it down.
Otherwise we face a bleak and an uncertain future of steadily
rising infections and admissions until as I say the capacity of
the NHS is breached.
And I know there has been some debate about the projections from
some of these models,
for example, exactly how big the loss of life might be,
or the precise point at which the NHS might be overwhelmed,
but all the scientific experts that I have talked to are
unanimous on one point
As the Chief Medical Officer has said –
“if we did not act now, then the chance of the NHS being in
extraordinary trouble in December would be very, very high.”
And be in no doubt Mr Speaker what that means for our country and
for our society.
It means that the precious principle
- of care for everyone who needs it, whoever they are and
whenever they need it – that principal
could be shattered for the first time in our experience
It means those who are sick and suffering and in need of help -
could be turned away because there was no room in our hospitals
Mr Speaker even in East Sussex Mr Speaker.
Doctors and nurses could be forced to make impossible choices
about which patients would live and would die, who would get
oxygen and who couldn’t.
And I know that there are some Members like my honourable friend
who are hearing from their local hospitals that the pressure is
not that great yet.
But the whole point about a National Health Service,
is that when hospitals in one part of the country are over-run,
sick patients are transferred to another,
until the whole system falls over.
And let me be clear this existential threat to our NHS comes not
from focusing too much on Coronavirus, as is sometimes asserted
but from not focusing enough.
Because if we fail to get Coronavirus under control, it is the
sheer weight of demand from Covid patients that would not only
lead to the covid casualties that I’ve described but which would
deprive other patients of the care they need.
We simply cannot reach the point where our National Health
Service is no longer there for everyone.
And Mr Speaker this fate is not inevitable.
We are moving to these national measures here when the rate both
of deaths and infections is lower than they were for instance in
France, when President Macron took similar steps.
If we act now and act decisively we can stem the rising waters
before our defences are breached.
And this approach, these regulations I do believe are the way we
can do that.
Mr Speaker, I know there are many in the House who are concerned
about how long these measures might last,
and that if people vote for these regulations today,
they could suddenly find that we are trapped with these national
measures for months on end.
So let me level with the House.
Of course, I cannot say exactly where the epidemiology will be by
2nd December,
But what I can say is that the national measures – that I hope
the House will vote on tonight - are time-limited.
It is not that we choose to stop them.
They legally expire.
So whatever we decide to do from 2nd December will
require a fresh mandate and a fresh vote from this House.
And as I have made clear, it is my express intent that we should
return to a tiered system on a local and a regional basis
according to the latest data and trends.
Mr Speaker, the whole House will share my sorrow and regret at
the necessity of these measures,
particularly for businesses who had just got back on their feet
Mr Speaker, who had done their level best to make themselves
Covid-secure,
installing handwashing stations, plexiglass screens, one-way
systems
And as the Chancellor has set out, we will do whatever it takes
to support them.
We have protected almost 10 million jobs with furlough, and we
are now extending this scheme throughout November.
We have already paid out £13 billion to help support the
self-employed, and we are now doubling our support from 40 to 80
per cent of trading profits for the self-employed for this month.
We’re providing cash grants of up to £3,000 per month for
businesses who are closed - worth over £1 billion a month and
benefiting over 600,000 business premises.
We are giving funding of £1.1 billion to Local Authorities in
England, to further support businesses and their local economy in
the winter months.
And this comes on top of the more than £200 billion we’ve
provided since March.
And we will also ensure that throughout this period that our
schools stay open.
We will not allow this virus to do any further damage to the
future of our children.
I said in the Summer we had a moral duty to reopen our schools as
soon as it was safe to do so
and that they would be the last element of society to close down
again.
And we have stuck to that pledge Mr Speaker
Our schools will remain open, as will colleges, universities,
childcare and early years settings.
Mr Speaker, the measures before the House are designed to arrest
the virus, to drive it down and to get on top of it once and for
all.
If we are able to test on a big enough scale to identify the
people who are infected – often without symptoms and who
unwittingly, asymptomatically pass the virus to others
then those people will be helped immediately – this is the key
thing - to self-isolate and break the chains of transmission,
and reducing the spread of the virus –reducing the number of
people in hospital, reducing the number of people dying.
I think that if we all play our part in this system it could be a
hugely valuable weapon in our fight against Covid in the short
medium and long term, and an alternative to the blanket
restrictions that have been imposed in so many parts of the
world.
We are piloting this week a mass test in Liverpool, where an
immense effort benefiting from the logistical skill of the armed
services will offer everyone a test.
And our aim is to make mass and repeated testing available for
everyone across the country.
Thanks to the pioneering work of British scientists, we already
have a life-saving treatment for Covid and the genuine
possibility of a safe and effective vaccine next year.
Taken together, these achievements provide every reason for
confidence that our country can and will pull through this crisis
and that our ingenuity will prove equal to the challenge.
Mr Speaker, this year I and the whole government has asked much
of the British people.
More than any Prime Minister I believe has asked of the British
people in peacetime.
And I have to say that the public have responded magnificently
and selflessly.
Putting their lives on hold, bearing any burden, overcoming every
obstacle and tolerating every disruption and inconvenience no
matter how large or small or inconsistent Mr Speaker so that they
can do the right thing by their fellow citizens.
I wish that it had been enough to defeat this Autumn surge.
But while I am more optimistic now, more optimistic about the
medium and long-term future than I have been for many months,
there can be no doubt that the situation before us today is
grave, and the need for action acute.
It is absolutely right for this House – for members on all sides
of this House- to have the doubts that have been expressed, to
seek answers from me and to provide scrutiny.
That is the purpose and duty of the House of Commons.
But, while it pains me to call for such restrictions on lives,
liberty and business, I have no doubt that these restrictions
represent the best and safest path for our country, our people
and our economy.
So now is the time for us to put our differences aside and focus
on the next four weeks, getting this virus back to its box.
And I know that, once again, our amazing country will respond to
adversity by doing what is right
– staying at home, protecting the NHS, and saving lives.
And in that spirit, I commend these regulations to the House.
|