, Labour’s Shadow Chancellor, responding to the
Chancellor’s statement, said:
I would like to thank the Chancellor for his statement, and for
advance copy of the announcement.
I have called for the introduction of a system of targeted wage
support forty times. That call has been rebuffed by his
government twenty times. It’s a relief they have U-turned now.
But this comes too late for many people who have already lost
their jobs - because the businesses employing them believed there
would be no wage support following the end of next month.
Indeed, the deadline for redundancy consultations by large firms
before the end of the furlough scheme, came and went last week
without a word from this government.
If the package of measures announced today can help people keep
their jobs, and can help businesses through hard times, then
Labour will of course support them- and there’s much in this
statement that we do support.
But we must ensure measures are as effective as possible at
keeping workers in employment, getting unemployed people back
into work, and keeping viable businesses in operation.
As with many previous announcements by this Government, we must
wait for the detail to be announced, presumably following the
press conference scheduled for later on today. But workers and
businesses will be hanging right now on the Chancellor’s every
word- and they need to know what is promised here.
So can the Chancellor be clear.
Will this scheme of wage support actually keep more people in
work? For that to happen, the scheme must make it more attractive
to employers to retain more staff, on reduced hours, than to
retain some full-time and make others redundant. So does his
scheme actually incentivise short-hours working?
What conditions – if any- will be applied to ensure value for
public money? Will the scheme require commitments for continuing
employment – unlike the existing furlough scheme where there have
been abuses? And will it require those participating to provide
decent, sustainable work?
Will the scheme incentivise training and retraining? The German
scheme does, and Labour’s called for a UK version to include
incentives for training- but that’s missing from this
government’s plan.
Indeed, while we welcome many of the elements the Chancellor has
announced today, the lack of action on training and skills is
worrying. The government has already allocated £3billion for a
National Skills Strategy- but it’s not being delivered on the
ground. So will the Chancellor work with businesses, trade
unions, further and higher education and local authorities to get
the training opportunities in place our country needs, so people
can be ready for the jobs of the future?
What will the Chancellor provide to help the self-employed
struggling during this period- where again, Labour has argued for
a targeted system of support? How can we avoid the gaps in
coverage that have bedevilled existing schemes?
And will the Chancellor do more to demand his colleagues get a
grip on the UK’s public health crisis? Our country is suffering
from a double tragedy: the highest excess death rate in Europe,
and the deepest recession in the G7. Labour supports the
government in its announcement of additional restrictions this
week. The government’s messaging has been confused enough
already- the last thing we want to do is add to that confusion.
But we are concerned that those restrictions have only been
necessary because of continuing problems with test, trace and
isolate.
When will he acknowledge that his government’s failures on test,
trace and isolate are having a substantial negative impact on our
economy- and what will he do to fix the system?
Before the summer recess, Labour called for a Back to Work Budget
focused on jobs, jobs, jobs. We didn’t get one. We expected a
Budget this autumn to address the major challenges our country
faces. It appears again- we’re not getting one. And the
Chancellor only announced he would make a statement to Parliament
today, after I’d hauled him here with an Urgent Question- which
I’m very grateful to Mr Speaker for granting.
We lagged behind on wage support; we lagged behind on support for
those having to self-isolate; we’re lagging behind on green
investment; and for these and other reasons it looks like our
recovery will be lagging behind. So finally when will the
Chancellor provide the Back to Work Budget this country needs?