Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial
Strategy (Rt Hon ): I am today updating Parliament on the
Government’s plans for a subsidy control regime to replace the EU
State aid rules at the end of the transition period on 31 December
this year.
From 1 January, the Government will follow the World Trade
Organisation rules for subsidy control. These are the
internationally recognised common standard for subsidies. The
rules apply to goods, not services. They ban subsidies that are
dependent on either how much a company exports to other countries
or the use of domestic goods over imports. For all other
subsidies, they provide a mechanism to resolve disputes between
countries. These rules are designed to facilitate an effective
international trading system and are followed by the vast
majority of countries.
Before the end of this year, the Government will publish guidance
for UK public authorities to explain these rules and any related
commitments the Government has agreed in Free Trade Agreements.
The Government will also publish a consultation in the coming
months on whether we should go further than those existing
commitments, including whether legislation is necessary. As our
approach will affect businesses and all public authorities that
grant subsidies with taxpayers’ money, including the Devolved
Administrations, we will take the necessary time to listen
closely to all those voices and to create a system that promotes
a competitive and dynamic economy throughout the UK.
We will shortly lay secondary legislation to remove redundant EU
State aid rules from the domestic statute book at the end of the
transition period. This will provide the necessary legal
certainty for businesses.
The UK Internal Market Bill, which I am introducing into
Parliament today, will set out that the UK Parliament alone
should legislate for the regulation of subsidies, and will ensure
that there is no confusion or ambiguity in UK law about the
interpretation of the State aid elements in the Northern Ireland
Protocol.
As regards this Government’s substantive approach, one of the
benefits of having left the EU is that we have the opportunity to
design our own subsidy control regime – in a way that works for
the UK economy. The EU’s State aid system is designed for the
particular circumstances of the EU, in which it is the
responsibility of the Commission, as an independent authority, to
police against subsidies distorting competition between EU member
states within the single market. This approach is not suitable
for the UK in the future and indeed their particular approach has
not been followed in other advanced economies.
We are very clear nevertheless that we do not intend to return to
the 1970s approach of Government trying to run the economy or
bailing out unsustainable companies. We do not believe that the
Government of a modern, competitive market economy should stand
in the way or prevent adjustment to underlying market conditions.
That is and will remain our guiding philosophy.
Equally, just as other countries do, the UK will need a modern
system for supporting businesses to grow and thrive in a way that
suits our interests and is consistent with a dynamic and
competitive economy. As we rebuild and recover from COVID, and
given the broader uncertainty in the economic environment as a
result, we must also maintain flexibility to support and bolster
the UK’s strategic interests, and to be able to intervene faster
and more easily when it is necessary to do so.
Subsidy control is an important issue in the negotiations on our
future relationship with the EU. The Government has always been
clear about its position: we are seeking a precedented trade
deal, similar to those the EU has previously agreed with
countries like Canada. Such free trade agreements do not
prescribe the specifics of either party’s subsidy control
arrangements, but instead provide for transparency in subsidies
granted and for appropriate means of settling disputes between
them. We have proposed such arrangements to the EU and we believe
this is the right way forward. We will not give away our ability
to determine our laws and funding arrangements in this area in an
international treaty: the UK’s subsidy arrangements are a matter
for people across the UK and Parliament, now and in the future.