Support frontline workers to engage parents struggling with safer sleeping advice
|
A new report by the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel calls
for new tools to help prevent the sudden unexpected death of
infants (SUDI). The government needs to develop new tools to help
prevent the sudden unexpected death of infants (SUDI), says a new
review by the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel. The
independent panel of experts reviews serious child safeguarding
incidents, when children have died or suffered serious harm, to
learn how to improve the...Request free
trial
A new report by the Child Safeguarding Practice Review
Panel calls for new tools to help prevent the sudden unexpected
death of infants (SUDI).
The government needs to develop new tools to help prevent the sudden unexpected death of infants (SUDI), says a new review by the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel. The independent panel of experts reviews serious child safeguarding incidents, when children have died or suffered serious harm, to learn how to improve the safeguarding system. While the overall numbers of babies dying from SUDI are decreasing, a worrying number of deaths have been notified to the panel as serious child safeguarding incidents. Between June 2018 and August 2019, the deaths of 40 babies from SUDI were reported to the panel. Most of whom died after co-sleeping in bed or on a chair or sofa, often with parents who had consumed drugs or alcohol. The review reveals families with babies at risk of dying in this way are often struggling with several issues, such as domestic violence, poor mental health or unsuitable housing. It found that these deaths often occur when families experience disruption to their normal routines and so are unable to engage effectively with safer sleeping advice. Due to coronavirus (COVID-19) and the associated anxieties about money, social isolation and mental health issues, disruptions that led to the deaths of these infants may be more prominent at present. To address this, the panel is calling for local areas to reduce the risk of SUDIby incorporating it into wider strategies for responding to social and economic deprivation, domestic violence and parental mental health concerns. This should be backed up by new government tools and processes to support frontline practitioners and local safeguarding partners to make these changes. Interim Chair of the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel, Karen Manners QPM said:
Leading SUDI expert and Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel Member, Prof Peter Sidebotham said:
Chief Executive of The Lullaby Trust, Jenny Ward said:
The review examines the deaths of 14 babies from 12 local areas to understand how professionals can best support parents to ensure that safer sleep advice is heard and embedded. The findings show that:
The review makes recommendations for the Department for Education, Department of Health and Social Care, Home Office and Public Health England to:
The review also recommends that further practice-based research is undertaken to establish the efficacy of different interventions to reduce the risk of SUDI and into the use of behavioural insights and models of behaviour change. The panel is exploring options to commission this research and is interested in hearing from organisations to partner on this work. The panel’s annual report shows that babies are most at risk of serious harm and death from abuse and neglect. Therefore, it is undertaking a further in-depth review into the non-accidental injury of infants under one year old. Notes to editorsThe Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel is an independent body that was set up to identify, commission and oversee reviews of serious child safeguarding cases. It brings together experts from social care, policing and health to provide a multi-agency view on cases which they believe raise issues that are complex, or of national importance. The review examined 14 incidents of SUDI from 12 local areas that were representative of the 40 SUDI cases reported to the Panel between June 2018 and August 2019. There were 4 parts to the review:
This was a qualitative study, based on interviews with practitioners and families, underpinned by factual details from each case. Between 29 June 2018 and 30 June 2020, the panel received 757 rapid reviews relating to child abuse and neglect. Of these:
|
