With biodiversity declining faster than ever before, MPs are to
consider how the Government can enhance healthy ecosystems
The Environmental Audit Committee (EAC) has today launched
a new inquiry, Biodiversity and Ecosystems, that will consider
how best to protect and enhance biodiversity while considering
nature-based solutions to climate change.
The inquiry launch comes at a time when biodiversity is
declining faster than at any time in human history, and 15% of
species in the UK are threatened with extinction. This is due to
a number of factors, including climate change, urbanisation,
pollution, invasive non-native species and aspects of
agricultural and woodland management.
Limiting this decline is crucial as healthy ecosystems are
vital for human existence, providing food, energy, sustaining air
quality and being the sole sinks absorbing carbon
emissions.
The Committee’s inquiry will consider a range of factors,
ranging from the state of UK biodiversity, how ecosystems can be
protected and maintained and how nature-based solutions to
climate change can complement biodiversity. It will have
concluded its inquiry by the time of the now-postponed
Biodiversity COP scheduled before COP26 next year.
Environmental Audit Committee Chairman, , said:
“From plant life to insects, from invertebrates to mammals,
each species plays an important role in the health of ecosystems
around the country. Sadly, we have a growing list of species
threatened with extinction; such as the water vole being an
‘ecosystem engineer’ generating new plant growth, and hedgehogs
being an indicator of how healthy ecosystems are.
“Maintaining their numbers is crucial if we are to continue
living healthy lives. Healthy ecosystems play an important role
in food security, air quality and natural solutions to absorbing
harmful emissions.
“During this inquiry, the Committee will be considering the
current state of the UK’s biodiversity, how we can prevent any
further loss, and the opportunities for nature-based solutions
for climate change.”
Terms of reference
The Committee is inviting written submissions on the
following issues.
The state of biodiversity:
· How
effectively is the Government monitoring the impact of UK
activities on biodiversity, at home and abroad?
· How
has the Government performed against the Aichi Biodiversity
Targets and what further progress is needed?
· Where
should the four nations prioritise resources to tackle
biodiversity loss?
Evaluating measures to conserve and enhance
biodiversity:
-
How should the Environmental Land Management scheme
maintain and improve biodiversity? What role might alternative
land use play in delivering improvements to biodiversity under
the ELM scheme?
-
How effective are the new measures to enhance
biodiversity within the Environment Bill, particularly
biodiversity net gain and Nature Recovery Networks? Do these
measures complement existing regulatory frameworks and address
issues surrounding how to value nature?
-
How should Nature Recovery Networks be planned, funded
and delivered?
-
How effective are other policies for conservation and
enhancement of existing natural habitats, such as the Woodland
Grant Schemes?
Co-ordination of UK environmental policy:
-
How can policy be better integrated to address
biodiversity, climate change and sustainable
development?
-
How can biodiversity and ecosystems help achieve the air,
soil and water quality objectives in the 25 Year Environment
Plan?
-
How well is the UK addressing biodiversity loss in its
Overseas Territories and in international development
partnerships with other countries?
-
What outcomes and protections should the UK Government be
pushing for at the forthcoming UN negotiations on the post-2020
global biodiversity framework at the Convention on Biological
Diversity COP 15?
Economics and biodiversity:
-
What are the possible approaches to balancing economic
growth and conservation of nature and its contributions? Is
there evidence these approaches work and can be
implemented?
-
What does the UK Government need to do to maximise human
prosperity – in terms of health, economic, and social
wellbeing—within the ecological and resource constraints of a
finite planet? What alternative models and measures of economic
welfare can feasibly help achieve this?
Pairing nature-based solutions to climate change with
biodiversity:
-
Which nature-based solutions are most effective in
achieving both climate and biodiversity goals?
-
What would constitute clear indicators of progress and
cost-effectiveness of nature-based solutions and how should
trade-offs and co-benefits associated with nature-based
solutions, biodiversity and socioeconomic outcomes be
considered?
-
How can funding be mobilised to support effective
nature-based solutions to climate change? How can the private
sector be encouraged to contribute to funding?