The UK’s four-nation lockdown exit strategy could create confusion
amongst the public and lead to non-compliance of guidance and rules
if not communicated transparently, warns a new Institute for
Government paper.
Published today, A Four-nation Exit Strategy: How the UK and
devolved governments should approach coronavirus says there may
be legitimate reasons – such as evidence that the coronavirus
risk has fallen more in certain parts of the UK – for England,
Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland to move at different speeds
in lifting the lockdown.
Because health is a devolved matter, UK ministers cannot simply
enforce a UK-wide approach. A co-ordinated exit strategy would be
preferable. But a co-ordinated approach does not mean a uniform
approach, and a UK-wide strategy is not the same as a UK
government strategy. The devolved governments will also be
involved in taking key decisions.
If plans diverge across the four nations, then UK ministers will
need to be clearer in how they communicate their plans to the
public. There has already been confusion over whether certain
policies and announcements – for example on free school meals and
testing targets – apply across the UK or only in England. And
Scotland has already diverged from Westminster by recommending
the use of face coverings in certain circumstances.
There is also a danger that variable restrictions could generate
a sense of unfairness and undermine compliance. This would be
especially problematic if there is any suggestion of divergence
on the big decisions – such as when to lift the ‘stay at home’
requirement for the public, or when to allow different types of
business to reopen.
We also argue that:
· Significant policy differences on each side of the Irish border
could result in health and economic problems – meaning Northern
Ireland could choose to align some of its exit plans with the
Republic of Ireland rather than Great Britain.
· Any variation between the nations should be based on shared
evidence and transparency about how decisions are being taken.
There should not be accidental divergence of rules within the UK.
· Reliance on Whitehall capacity and schemes led by the UK
government, such as the contact-tracing app, are likely to limit
the scope for significant policy differences.
Akash Paun, co-author of the report, said:
“The UK and devolved governments should work together on a
co-ordinated four-nation exit strategy. But co-ordination is not
the same as uniformity. Decisions about how and when to lift the
lockdown will be taken separately by ministers in Westminster,
Edinburgh, Cardiff and Belfast. And there may be legitimate
reasons for them to take different approaches in some areas. What
is crucial is that any variation should be clearly communicated
and based on shared evidence and transparency about how decisions
are being taken.”