Mr (Bury South) (Ind): As the first
Bury Member of Parliament to speak, may I congratulate you on your
fantastic achievement, Mr Speaker? Following yesterday’s decision,
which was based on merit, you have been able to bring a great sense
of unity to the House.
Turning to soft power, what are the Government doing to make it
clear to the Indian Government that we have extremely serious
concerns about human rights abuses in Kashmir? What will the
Government do to promote the concept of self-determination for
the Kashmiri people? Time and again before elections, people on
the Front Benches make commitments to promote self-determination,
yet Governments have repeatedly failed to do anything about the
issue when it comes to using soft power in international
institutions.
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Foreign and
Commonwealth Affairs (Mrs ): That was a serious
question, and it behoves me to give a serious answer. The Foreign
Secretary has spoken to the Indian Foreign Secretary about the
matter, raising our concerns about humanitarian issues,
particularly in Kashmir. As for the election and commitments
regarding an independent Kashmir, the matter should be sorted out
on a bilateral basis between the two countries.
Mr Gavin Shuker (Luton South) (Ind): As the first to be called under your
tenure, Mr Speaker, may I, too, offer my congratulations on your
elevation?For 10 years in this place I have repeatedly raised
with the Foreign Secretary and his predecessors the appalling
human rights abuses in Kashmir. Further to our recent
disappointing exchange of letters, can he give one single example
of actions he has taken in robustly challenging the Indian
Government’s revocation of article 370 of the Indian
constitution?
The Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and
First Secretary of State (): The hon. Gentleman has been
a stalwart champion of human rights and has indeed taken a very
close interest in foreign policy in relation to this region. He
asks what we have done. As the Under-Secretary of State, my hon.
Friend the Member for South Derbyshire (Mrs Wheeler), said
earlier, fundamentally the issue of Kashmir needs to be resolved
between the two parties, but we never duck the issue of human
rights in any country. I have raised the issue of human rights in
Saudi Arabia with the Saudi Foreign Minister and, particularly in
relation to detentions, blackouts and internet blockages, with
the Indian Foreign Minister. We will continue to do that because
it is absolutely important. Even with some of our closest
partners, we need to be able to have those candid
conversations.
(Bradford East) (Lab): I
congratulate you, Mr Speaker, and I refer the House to my entry
in the Register of Members’ Financial Interests. Following on
from the Secretary of State’s previous response, it has been
three months today since the draconian illegal blockade in
Kashmir began. Thousands continue to be arrested without any due
process. There are food shortages and medicine shortages, and
persecution, oppression and injustice continue, yet the UK
Government remain silent. The United Nations Security Council
remains silent, and the international community remain silent.
The sons and daughters of Kashmir are asking a simple question:
does a Kashmiri child not feel the same pain as any other child?
Does a Kashmiri child not bleed in the same way as any other
child? Is a Kashmiri child’s death not worth the same as any
other child’s death? Why is the world silent?
: I thank the hon. Gentleman,
and I understand the passion with which he raises this issue. Of
course we feel for the suffering of anyone in Kashmir, and we
certainly have not been quiet on this issue. I have raised it
with the Indian Foreign Minister, and we have discussed it with
our partners. It has been discussed in international forums more
widely, so I can reassure him and his constituents on both sides
that we continually raise and will continue to raise these
matters with the Indian Government. Equally, the wider issue of
Kashmir, as has already been said in the Chamber, is a bilateral
dispute that we feel—and, indeed, the UN Secretary Council
resolutions and the international community have said—ought to be
resolved bilaterally. We would certainly encourage and want to
facilitate all those efforts to achieve that solution.