In a withering report published today
31st October, the House of Commons
Justice Committee condemns the lack of a clear reform plan and
long-term strategy to reverse the fortunes of a prison system in
an “enduring crisis of safety and decency”. Today’s report makes
conclusions and recommendations in a range of areas. These
include:
-
Series of “policy by press release” announcements
indicating focus on building new prison places to accommodate
tougher sentences has refreshed concerns over the near £1
billion maintenance backlog on “appalling” state of existing
prison estate.
-
The condition of the prison system is such that a
multi-year funding settlement is urgently required. Prisons
should be safe and decent environments that rehabilitate
offenders - this not currently the case. The Committee is
calling again for a long-term plan to improve the prison system
underpinned by the funding make it work.
-
Much greater investment in purposeful activity is
needed to reduce the estimated £18 billion cost of reoffending
and improve safety in prisons. The Government's recent
announcements on sentencing may over time result in a
significantly increased prison population, without any
guarantees that the necessary infrastructure will be put in
place to avoid further overcrowding of prisons.
-
Even at a daily operational level, the Committee
says current arrangements for facilities management do not
work. The Ministry should move as soon as possible away from
national contracts for facilities management to much smaller,
localised arrangements, so that governors have more control
over the service and can adapt it to meet the needs of their
prison. Initiatives already in place where teams of staff and
prisoners carry out minor maintenance work around the prison
show what can be achieved and Government should look seriously
at rolling out similar initiatives across the whole prison
estate.
-
Greater autonomy for prison governors is welcome
but will not drive necessary change without clear structures
and mechanisms for accountability. Additional responsibilities
for governors under the empowerment agenda do not match the
rhetoric used by the Ministry of Justice, meaning there is
still no clarity either as to what governors themselves are
responsible for, or who is accountable for the performance of
individual prisons.
-
Assessment of prison performance is heavily skewed
towards safety and security – though even with that, it is
taking too long to get important security equipment like body
scanners into prisons, and these processes must be reviewed and
made to work more efficiently. The commitment to additional
measures on purposeful activity and time spent out of cells is
welcome, but there needs to be a whole-prison approach to
measuring prison performance, particularly measures relating to
health and education provision.
-
Too often, prisons are identified as needing extra
support, but their performance continues to decline. In the
case of HMP Bristol, the Chief Inspector of Prisons invoked the
urgent notification protocol despite the fact the prison was
under the Ministry’s own special measures. There is little
point in identifying poor performance if the necessary
resources are not then provided to drive
improvement.
Chair of the Justice Committee, MP, said:
“The prison system in England and Wales is enduring a
crisis of safety and decency. Too often we have seen what might
be called "policy by press notice" without any clear or coherent
vision for the future of the prison system. New prison places
might be welcome, but they do nothing to improve the appalling
condition of much of the current prison estate, nor the prospect
of offering a safe environment in which to rehabilitate
offenders. Prisons will not become less violent without proper
investment in purposeful activity for prisoners to support
rehabilitation. At any rate, given Government’s poor track record
in building prisons, we now want to see the detailed plans for
the promised £2.5 billion for 10,000 more places, what they’ll
look like and when they’ll be up and running.”
The Committee also reiterates its wide-ranging concerns
about recruitment, retention, training and incentives for prison
staff, from governors to officers, and makes a series of
practical recommendations to begin to try to address these
problems within a coherent framework for reform.