Labour Leader has written to Cabinet
Secretary seeking confirmation that
could not force through a No
Deal Brexit in the middle of a general election campaign.
Corbyn’s letter follows briefings by Downing Street that
could seek to force through
No Deal through a Westminster stitch-up, without any democratic
mandate and during a general election campaign, to block the
people deciding at the ballot box.
In the letter, Corbyn denounces the plot as “an unprecedented,
unconstitutional and anti-democratic abuse of power”.
Corbyn argues that it is only right to “let the electorate
decide” the country's future and not allow a stitch up from “a
Prime Minister elected, not by the public, but by a small number
of unrepresentative Conservative Party Members.”
Ends
Full text of the letter
Dear ,
You will no doubt be aware of press speculation that, even if
Parliament votes that it has no confidence in the current
Conservative government, the Prime Minister could attempt to
force through a disastrous No Deal Brexit by scheduling a general
election after the UK is due to leave the European Union on 31
October.
Forcing through No Deal against a decision of Parliament, and
denying the choice to the voters in a general election already
underway, would be an unprecedented, unconstitutional and
anti-democratic abuse of power by a Prime Minister elected, not
by the public, but by a small number of unrepresentative
Conservative Party members.
I am therefore writing to seek your urgent clarification on the
proper application of ‘Purdah’ rules in such a scenario and the
constitutional implications of failing to abide by those
rules.
As you will be aware, Purdah guidance makes clear that “decisions
on matters of policy on which a new government might be expected
to want the opportunity to take a different view from the present
government should be postponed until after the election, provided
that such postponement would not be detrimental to the national
interest or wasteful of public money.''
As government assessments make clear, a No Deal Brexit would have
a deeply damaging impact on the economy, with serious
consequences for jobs, living standards and industry in this
country. A Labour government will never support a No Deal exit,
so would of course “want the opportunity to take a different
view.''
I would therefore be grateful for your confirmation that, if the
UK is due to leave the EU without a deal during a general
election campaign, the government should seek a time-limited
extension to Article 50, to let the electorate decide and the
incoming government to take the next steps on the basis of the
voters’ wishes.
As this is a matter of public interest, I am making this letter
public.
Yours sincerely,
MP
Leader of the