Brexit Minister will warn that a chaotic
no deal Brexit threatens the future of the United Kingdom in a
speech later today.
Speaking at a Wales Governance Centre event in the Pierhead, he
will warn that the way the nations of the UK work together will
need to change if the union is to survive.
Two years ago the Welsh Government published ‘Brexit and
Devolution’, a plan to address the implications of Brexit for the
devolution settlement, intergovernmental relations, and the UK
constitution.
The Brexit Minister will say:
“As things currently stand we will leave the EU on 31 October,
potentially in a catastrophic no deal scenario.
“We are likely facing a straight choice between a no deal Brexit
or remaining in the EU – and we are unequivocal in backing
remain. To make this happen, we are calling on Parliament to
legislate for a referendum, with remain on the ballot paper.
“It is my view that a disorderly, chaotic exit from the EU would
threaten the very future of the United Kingdom, and no amount of
reform of the current intergovernmental relations will be capable
of mitigating that risk.
“In future, the devolved administrations must be fully involved
in negotiating our future relationships. We need to see concrete
progress and an undertaking that compromise will be needed on all
sides. In that way, we have a chance of delivering change.
“There have been successes, and there are encouraging signs
across Whitehall that the penny is beginning to drop. Welsh
Government will continue to lead the debate, and to make the case
for a set of intergovernmental structures which meet the
challenges we face now, and will face in the coming years.”
“When we published Brexit and Devolution, we didn’t claim to have
all the answers.
We said: here are the issues we face as a result of Brexit - the
reasons why the existing intergovernmental machinery simply won’t
cut it anymore. And here are our proposals for change.
“Two years on, what’s changed? The short answer is not enough.
“Today, people under 40 can barely imagine a world without
devolution, but in many ways the UK Government’s approach still
reflects a very dated ‘grace and favour’ attitude: if we behave
ourselves, the UK Government will, out of the goodness of its
hearts, allow us some limited powers of self-government.
“The existing, inadequate intergovernmental arrangements and
structures remain, without even an agreed plan for how they might
be reformed. In that sense, nothing has changed. No progress has
been made in respect of our call for a Council of Ministers, or
for a better system for dispute resolution. And that is deeply
disappointing.
“If we are to see real progress, we need a change in attitude
towards devolution, based on mutual respect and parity of esteem
and participation between the various governments.”
Ends
Notes to editors
The policy document provides a blueprint for reform, and
proposes:
- Criteria for identifying where new UK frameworks relating to
devolved areas may be appropriate;
- Such UK frameworks should be developed and agreed by
consensus by the devolved administrations and UK Government,
drawing on independent arbitration if necessary to seek to
achieve full agreement;
- As a fall-back, the support of one devolved administration
plus the UK Government would be sufficient to enable a framework
to be agreed;
- Developing new ways to seek agreement on areas where reserved
powers and devolved powers are inter-connected, and devolved
administrations have a strong interest in UK Government policy
responsibilities;
- A new ‘UK Council of Ministers’ should be created involving
the UK Government and the three devolved administrations to
provide the forum for discussing and agreeing frameworks, which
would then be binding;
- The secretariat for the UK Council of Ministers must be
independent;
- If a dispute arises on the operation of an agreed framework
there should be an independent adjudication mechanism; and
- A Convention on the Future of the UK should be set up to
develop and gain consensus to a long-term, sustainable UK
constitution.
- The UK will be stronger for an open debate on constitutional
implications of leaving the EU. Our policy document seeks to
support this and we will be constructive, active participants in
helping to shape our collective future.