-
New research from the Education Policy
Institute (EPI) commissioned by Pearson, shows real terms
funding per student has fallen sharply by 16% from 2010/11 to
2018/19: twice the decline of schools
(8%).
-
Sixth forms and colleges are increasingly
falling into deficit.
-
Student learning hours and staff wages have
both deteriorated.
-
The government should urgently review the
adequacy of 16-19 education funding ahead of this year's
Spending Review.
A new report from the Education Policy Institute
(EPI) examines the financial health of sixth forms and colleges
in England, revealing the extent of the funding squeeze affecting
these institutions.
The report, commissioned by Pearson, considers 16-19 education
funding, which includes school sixth forms, sixth form colleges
and further education colleges. Compared to other education
phases, such as schools (pre-16) and universities, these
institutions have consistently received less focus from
policy-makers over the last three decades.
Funding levels and the quality of provision in sixth forms and
colleges can have a huge impact on life
chances. They also affect the vast majority of young
people: between the age of 16 and 19, three-quarters of
all young people attend these institutions. At present, there
are a total of 1.4 million students enrolled in England.
This new report provides the most up to date assessment
of funding in these institutions, revealing the latest figures
for 2018/19. The research explores the impact on
different types of institutions and groups of students across the
country. It also considers how funding has affected
qualifications, teacher wages and the quality of education on
offer.
Key findings
Funding trends in sixth forms and
colleges
-
Between 2010/11 and 2018/19, real terms funding per
student in school sixth forms, sixth form colleges, and further
education (FE) colleges declined substantially, by 16 per cent,
from £5,900 to £4,960. This is twice the rate that the
overall schools budget fell by between 2009/10 and 2017/18 (8
per cent).
-
Funding in school sixth forms declined by 26 per cent
per full time student from 2010/11 to 2018/19. In the further
education sector (sixth form colleges and FE colleges), funding
declined by 18 per cent per full time student. Within
this, funding for sixth form colleges fell faster than in FE
colleges.
-
Despite funding being shifted towards disadvantaged
students over this period, students in all
institutions have experienced real terms funding cuts.
-
16-19 education has been the biggest real terms loser
of any phase of education since 2010/11, but it has also
suffered from a long run squeeze in funding: 30
years ago, 16-19 funding was far higher (almost 1.5 times) than
secondary school funding, but is now lower.
-
The financial health of 16-19 providers has
significantly deteriorated since 2010/11: the proportion of
those with in-year deficits has increased across all
institutions, with a particularly large rise seen in
sixth form colleges: a five-fold increase of 7 to 36 per cent
from 2010/2011 to 2016/17.
-
An increasing number of local authority schools with
sixth forms are in financial difficulty – the proportion with
cumulative deficits has risen significantly from 12 per cent of
schools in 2010/11 to 22 per cent in 2017/18. In stark
contrast, schools without sixth forms have only seen rises of 6
per cent to 9 per cent.
Provision in sixth forms and colleges
-
Students in 16-19 education are receiving fewer hours
of learning: learning hours with a teacher for
students in all institutions fell by 9 per cent between 2012/13
and 2016/17. The deterioration of 16-19 institutions’ finances
may exacerbate these trends further.
-
This fall in taught hours is particularly prominent in
academic subjects: level 3 subjects (A level or
equivalent) have seen a sharp decline in hours by 21 per cent
between 2012/13 and 2016/17.
- For academic subjects, there has been a large decline in AS
provision, which has not been offset by rises in the number of
hours elsewhere. This may raise concerns about the
curriculum becoming even narrower: upper secondary
education in England is already narrow compared to leading
education nations in the OECD.
Teacher pay in sixth forms and colleges
-
Teacher pay has fallen across 16-19 institutions, but
has declined particularly in further education colleges - by 8
per cent from 2010/11 to 2016/17(from £33,600 to
£31,000).
-
This means that teacher wages in FE colleges are now
around 17 per cent lower than for teachers in secondary
schools. This may have implications for the quality of
provision, and may adversely affect the most
disadvantaged young people, given FE colleges admit a
disproportionate number of students from such backgrounds.
Ofsted ratings
-
There is no clear relationship between the recent
funding squeeze and the Ofsted rating of 16-19
providers. However, it remains the case that the
Ofsted ratings of FE colleges, on the whole, are less
favourable than for schools.
Policy recommendations
-
The government should urgently review the adequacy of
16-19 funding, to understand whether current funding
rates are jeopardising the sector’s financial sustainability.
-
The government should assess the impact of 16-19
funding changes on curriculum breadth, ensuring that
young people have a good choice of high quality post-16
academic and vocational qualifications.
-
The government should review the impact of funding
changes on disadvantaged students and consider
whether funding is supporting the government's aim of narrowing
the attainment gap.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Commenting on the new report, Gerard Dominguez-Reig,
Senior Researcher at the Education Policy Institute (EPI),
said:
“While it is widely acknowledged that schools are facing
growing funding pressures, our research shows that the financial
health of sixth forms and colleges is particularly
precarious.
“The sharp, real terms decline in funding over nine years has
led to larger deficits in 16-19 education institutions, and has
taken place alongside a substantial fall in student learning
hours, with declines of over 20 per cent in academic
subjects.”
Rt. Hon , Executive Chairman of the
Education Policy Institute (EPI), said:
"This research shows that for many decades, sixth form and
college funding has been the big loser relative to other phases
of education. Since 2010, sixth form funding per student has been
cut by 16 per cent - double the 8 per cent decline across all
school spending.
"It is not clear why successive governments have chosen to
squeeze 16-19 funding, and there is a strong case for reviewing
the adequacy of funding before the upcoming Spending Review. The
government should also consider if enough is being done to
support disadvantaged students, who are disproportionately
concentrated in FE colleges, where teacher pay is significantly
lower than that in school sixth forms."
Rod Bristow, President (UK and Core) of Pearson,
said:
“The EPI report makes plain that our schools and colleges
have been struggling against the tide of decreasing funding
levels by narrowing choices. This phase of learning has a big
impact on social mobility and people’s life chances. We should
use this opportunity to encourage a step change, to clarify the
16-19 pathways that offer the best return for young people, and
offer young people choices that expand their horizons and improve
their lives.”
Notes to editors
-
The Education Policy Institute (EPI) is an independent,
impartial, and evidence-based research institute that promotes
high quality education outcomes, regardless of social
background. We achieve this through data-led analysis,
innovative research and high-profile events. Find out more
about our work here: https://epi.org.uk/
-
16-19 education in England includes school sixth forms,
sixth form colleges, and further education colleges. Students
up until the age of 19 are included in this study as many
vocational courses last three years. Data for this age range is
also collected by the
DfE.
-
The analysis builds on research by the
Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) published in 2018.
The research found that total school spending per pupil had
fallen by 8% in real terms between 2009–10 and
2017–18.
-
Cumulative balances consider balances over time, and
whether institutions are in surplus or deficit. (Data for local
authority sixth forms only). In-year balances (all
institutions) examine income and expenditure for a given year
only and whether institutions are spending more money than they
have coming in for that year.