Government dodging the big questions on disability benefits
|
As the Secretary of State delivers a key speech on benefits at
disability equality charity Scope this afternoon, the Committee is
publishing the Government’s response to its report on the treatment
of disabled people under Universal Credit. Rt Hon Frank
Field MP, Chair of the Committee, said: “The Government’s response
to our report once again dodges all the big questions. In this
country, to be living with a disability is to be disproportionately
likely to be...Request free trial
As the Secretary of State delivers a key speech on benefits at disability equality charity Scope this afternoon, the Committee is publishing the Government’s response to its report on the treatment of disabled people under Universal Credit.
Rt Hon Frank Field MP, Chair of the Committee, said: “The Government’s response to our report once again dodges all the big questions. In this country, to be living with a disability is to be disproportionately likely to be living in poverty. Instead of tackling that, the design of Universal Credit will leave many disabled people even worse off. Yet in the face of that shocking truth, the Government keeps returning lacklustre responses like this. It must do better. I hope today’s speech is a sign it will start.”
The Committee has repeatedly raised concerns about disabled people left without the income vital to their needs while they await an assessment for PIP or ESA or - crucially - the correct decision based on it, with long delays, “shoddy, error ridden reports” and a protracted reconsideration and appeal process that sees high numbers of decisions ultimately overturned.
It has also highlighted problems with the way the Fit Note and other medical evidence is used in the process, but the Government’s response refuses again to engage with that question, citing instead the fact that the target for time taken “from Work Capability Assessment referral to [decision] recommendation has reduced from 32 weeks to 10 weeks”.
The Committee has particular concerns on the one exception in the process, to speed up awards for people who are dying. The Chair has tabled a series of Parliamentary Questions (full list below) aimed at uncovering, for example, how DWP justifies including the “reasonable expectation of death within six months” as a requirement in its terminal illness fast-tracking process.
Other key points from the response:
- As the Committee recommended, the Government will not start to migrate ESA claimants to UC until it has sorted out their existing ESA underpayment claims
- The Government has committed to accepting the recommendation that Universal Support providers will be funded to proactively offer on-going support to people who cannot use the online system
Commenting further on the reforms announced today by Work and Pensions Minister Amber Rudd, Chair Frank Field said:
“People claiming PIP and ESA should be able to trust that the assessments they must undergo will be fair, consistent and high quality. Time and time again we have heard they are none of these. Instead, claimants are let down by the repeated failings of an evidently shoddy, error-ridden process.
“These measures being announced today must be implemented with the key objective of making the whole process more manageable for disabled claimants, but changing the process alone will not fix the core problem. DWP must focus on bringing the quality of assessments up to scratch. And the lessons of Universal Credit should warn the Department against placing all its eggs in the “digital by default” basket, especially when - as the Committee heard from Scope last week - one in five disabled people does not or cannot access online forms.
“Trust in PIP and ESA assessments is in desperately short supply. We wait to see if these announcements translate into the change that can begin to restore it.”
The Secretary of State is expected to announce that Government is looking to exceed its target that “seeks one million more disabled people in work by 2027”, as more disabled people come into the workforce with the rising overall employment rate. The Government notably shelved its earlier target to halve the “disability employment gap” – the difference in employment rate between people with and without disabilities - in 2017, replacing it with the “one million more in work” number target.
On Monday the Committee called on the Secretary of State to press the Chancellor to end the benefit freeze a year early, in the Spring Statement next week./ENDS
Notes:
The full list Parliamentary Questions on terminal illness the Committee Chair has tabled:
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, for each year since 2016/17, how many universal credit full service claimants submitted a DS1500 form to access universal credit under the special rules for terminal illness; and how many of those applications were (a) accepted and (b) rejected.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many applicants that were refused access to the universal credit special rules for terminal illness died within six months of that refusal in each year since 2016-17.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment her Department has made of the effect on claimant wellbeing of the requirement to (a) declare a terminal illness and (b) declare a prognosis at the outset of a universal credit claim, as a precursor to accessing the special rules for terminal illness.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what support her Department has in place for claimants who have a terminal illness but have not declared this at the outset of their universal credit claim.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what consultation with stakeholders his Department undertook in advance of its decision to include a reasonable expectation of death within six months provision as a requirement for the issue of a DS1500 form.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many and what proportion of DS1500 forms issued to claimants of universal credit were not returned to the Department in each year since 2016-17.
A year’s Committee backlist on PIP and ESA assessments:
Committee concerned over victims of modern slavery being failed by criminal justice and welfare systems
|