Extracts from Lords debate on Plastic: Environmental Threat and Recycling - Dec 19
The Earl of Dundee (Con): My Lords, I begin by congratulating my
noble friend Lady Neville-Rolfe on securing this important and
timely debate. My remarks will touch briefly upon three themes and
how they interconnect: first, the so-called circular economy;
secondly, necessary adaptations to measures which so far have not
achieved enough; and thirdly, within this process, how the United
Kingdom can take a lead and give useful guidance. The notion of a
circular economy is much...Request free
trial
The Earl of Dundee (Con): My Lords, I begin by congratulating my noble friend Lady Neville-Rolfe on securing this important and timely debate. My remarks will touch briefly upon three themes and how they interconnect: first, the so-called circular economy; secondly, necessary adaptations to measures which so far have not achieved enough; and thirdly, within this process, how the United Kingdom can take a lead and give useful guidance.
The notion of a circular economy is much to be welcomed; as
opposed to a linear approach, it takes in many aspects together.
Thus, while looking at environmental benefits, it sets out to
promote economic ones as well. A recent report has indicated that
a faster development of circular economy activity could create
about 500,000 jobs and reduce unemployment by 100,000. Does my
noble friend the Minister agree with this concept and that
estimate? However, a substantial increase in our recycling capacity is unlikely to take place if UK recyclers remain uncertain about the market for their products. I therefore want to suggest three further actions that are needed. First, there needs to be a determined commitment from producers and retailers to specify the use of recycled plastic, as opposed to virgin raw materials, in all non-food packaging and indeed, in other plastic products. Secondly, local authorities and their waste management contractors need to have a much greater focus on the segregation of different material types at the point of collection. Over the last 30 years, their focus has been on the tonnage collected, regardless of the differing quality of the materials recovered for recycling. This matters with plastic recycling, and it has been another key factor in the UK becoming so dependent on export markets where overseas markets can afford to accept co-mingled and heavily cross-contaminated plastic waste for recycling. Thirdly, the Environment Agency must properly enforce regulations relating to the export of plastic packaging for overseas recycling. To date this has not happened. If these three actions were implemented, alongside the Chancellor’s recent commitment to a circular economy, we could look forward to a plastics recycling sector in the UK that is fit for purpose. Finally, I should welcome yesterday’s publication by the Government of Our Waste, Our Resources: A Strategy for England. It is another major step in establishing policies and actions for ensuring that we move towards a truly circular economy for plastic packaging, as well as tackling the problems of waste crime. The noble Lord, Lord Teverson, was quite right to raise that. I have two questions on the strategy that I want to put to my noble friend the Minister. First, it is a strategy for England. How joined-up is waste strategy across the United Kingdom? To what extent are the UK Government working with the devolved Administrations to ensure that we have an effective UK-wide strategy for waste?
Baroness Jones of Whitchurch
(Lab):...Finally, it is clear that unless we act
decisively, both domestically and globally, we are going to start
running out of resources. We have to put a new value on materials
which can be used again and again in a circular economy. Some radical thinking
is taking place among enlightened businesses and Governments
about how we can add value through reuse, repair and closed-loop
reprocessing. I was very pleased to see the waste strategy begin
to address those issues. The Minister will know that in the short
term a detailed circular economy package is being
drawn up at European level and has received provisional political
agreement. I would be grateful if she could confirm that the
Government intend to embrace that package if it is agreed at that
level. The truth is that, on the environment, the EU is streets
ahead of us. I hope she is able to reassure the House of the
Government’s determination to match, if not exceed, the EU’s
ambitions so that we can have some hope that we will be able to
take pride in our clean environment in the
future... Turning to the first life stage—production—we will reform the current producer responsibility system to incentivise sustainable design, including the use of more recycled materials, and require packaging producers to fund the collection and disposal or recycling of their packaging products. To aid this, the Chancellor announced a new world-leading tax on plastic packaging. This tax, which is subject to consultation, will apply to plastic packaging that does not contain at least 70% recycled plastic. This will transform financial incentives for manufacturers to look at packaging design and to produce more sustainable packaging by reducing the amount of virgin plastic that they use. A tax to promote recycled content will improve our already-strong recycling rates for packaging. In 2016, 44.9% of UK plastic packaging was recycled. This is not unfit for purpose, as noted by my noble friends Lady Neville-Rolfe and Lady Byford, but it perhaps requires improvement.
On the 50% target noted by the noble Baroness, Lady Parminter, we
are working very hard with local authorities to make sure that we
achieve it. Importantly, the tax will increase the value of and
demand for these recycled materials and support a circular economy for plastics...
|