Time is running out for the UK and EU to agree on a future security
relationship. If negotiators on both sides fail to find common
ground, we all stand to lose.
In its report, Brexit: the proposed
UK-EU security treaty, the House of Lords EU Home Affairs
Sub-Committee calls on the UK and EU to change its mindset
urgently and make pragmatic compromises on security matters to
achieve the over-riding objective of protecting the safety of UK
and EU citizens after Brexit.
The Government wishes to negotiate a single,
comprehensive security treaty with the EU, and has focussed on
three areas for future UK-EU security
cooperation: extradition; access to law
enforcement databases; and partnerships with EU agencies such as
Europol. All of these have been described as
“mission-critical” for day-to-day policing, and vital for keeping
communities across the UK safe.
The Committee supports the Government’s
ambition to continue security cooperation after Brexit, but there
is no evidence that sufficient progress has yet been made in the
negotiations. The Committee believes it is unlikely that such a
treaty can be agreed in the time
available.
Furthermore, the EU has given little indication
that it will be prepared to negotiate a bespoke treaty. The
Government therefore needs to show realism about what it can
achieve in the time remaining. If a comprehensive treaty cannot
be agreed, a series of ad hoc security arrangements could help to
ensure the level of cooperation we need.
The Committee also notes that in some areas
security cooperation will have to change post-Brexit. For
instance, some EU states, including Germany, are constitutionally
barred from extraditing their own nationals to non-EU states. The
Government has yet to provide any evidence-based analysis of the
effect of such changes.
The Committee also heard evidence of UK
reliance on EU datasets. UK police forces accessed the Schengen
Information System II, a database that can help track criminals,
539 million times in 2017, and the report concludes that if the
UK wishes to maintain access to databases, and close
relationships with EU agencies like Europol after Brexit, the
Government must be willing to be flexible about the shape of a
future security relationship.
, Chairman of the
Home Affairs Sub-Committee, said:
“The UK and the EU share a deep interest in
maintaining the closest possible police and security cooperation
after Brexit: protecting the safety of millions of UK and EU
citizens must be the over-riding objective. But time is short,
and neither side has yet approached the negotiations in this
spirit.
“We heard evidence that, by mid-May, the UK and
EU negotiators had spent little more than an hour discussing the
future internal security relationship, despite the obvious mutual
interest in making rapid progress. The safety of UK and EU
citizens demands that the negotiators turn urgently to this vital
task.
“The Government wants an overarching security
treaty, which would to a large extent replicate the status quo.
We don’t think this is achievable in the time available. We also
question whether it is politically realistic for the UK, in
current circumstances, to be seeking a bigger role in EU agencies
and better access to databases than some EU or EEA Member
States.
“It’s time for pragmatic compromises, on the UK
side, and also on the EU side. Red lines won’t save people’s
lives – getting agreement on effective police and security
cooperation will.”