NAO Report on Exiting the EU: Consumer Protection, competition and state aid
|
Preparing the UK’s legal and regulatory frameworks for consumer
protection, competition and state aid for EU exit is a significant
challenge, heightened by uncertainty around the future UK-EU
relationship and pressure in the Parliamentary timetable, says the
National Audit Office (NAO) in a report published today. The NAO
has reviewed how the Department of Business, Energy &
Industrial Strategy (BEIS), National Trading Standards and the
Competition and Markets...Request free
trial
Preparing the UK’s legal and regulatory frameworks for consumer protection, competition and state aid for EU exit is a significant challenge, heightened by uncertainty around the future UK-EU relationship and pressure in the Parliamentary timetable, says the National Audit Office (NAO) in a report published today. The NAO has reviewed how the Department of Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (BEIS), National Trading Standards and the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) are progressing with plans to build the UK’s legal framework, and capacity and capability in these three regulatory areas. The legal and regulatory frameworks covering consumer protection, competition and state aid aim to create fair and effective markets that support consumer confidence and economic growth, and ensure competition and markets work well for consumers. Risks of exiting the EU in these areas relate to cross-border issues, such as market surveillance and data sharing; cross-border enforcement; and consumer redress for cross-border transactions. BEIS has prioritised its legislative programme based on what will be critical for ensuring UK businesses and consumers can continue to trade effectively following the EU Exit. However, it will be challenging to ensure the passage of relevant secondary legislation in time for 30 March 2019 in the event of a no-deal scenario. Furthermore, there are challenges to build capacity and capability, particularly in the areas of state aid and competition. In the case of consumer protection, a number of changes need to be introduced. BEIS has received an additional £2.4 million to create a market surveillance system, as presently the UK uses the EU-wide system to share intelligence on product safety, which it may not have access to after EU Exit. New ways to work with EU member states on cross-border enforcement may also be required. Trading Standards services and the CMA are hoping to work bilaterally with EU member states, as they do with non EU states now, but expect this will take longer and be more expensive to put in place. Trading Standards services currently carry out checks at UK borders to identify unsafe products. No changes have been made to infrastructure at Dover, Kent, where the vast majority of goods imported through there are from the EU and do not currently receive checks. Currently the European Commission (EC) takes competition cases that affect multiple EU member states, including those impacting the UK. On Exit, the UK will need to build its capacity to deliver an effective competition regime. The CMA received an additional £20.3 million in 2018-19 to increase its workforce and capability to manage the expected increase in managing competition caseloads, which are currently covered by EU wide-investigations. The CMA expects it will need 240 extra people which, in a competitive environment, will require a concerted recruitment campaign to recruit staff. In preparation for exiting the EU, in March 2018, the government decided that the UK needed an independent domestic state aid regime, as state aide rules have been entirely enforced at EU level. The CMA has been allocated £3.3 million extra including 0.9 million for developing an IT system, to set up an entirely new state aid function and take on responsibility of the independent regulator. The NAO will continue to review how these authorities are managing these three regulatory areas and prioritising delivery risks.
Amyas Morse, the head of the NAO, said today: “It is not an easy task pushing forward with preparations for EU exit surrounded by what ifs. BEIS, National Trading Standards and the CMA have at least recognised which areas need to be ready by day one, but they will need cross-government support in implementing these priorities and cross-border cooperation to ensure UK consumers and businesses can continue to trade smoothly. “There will be many areas that departments and authorities across Whitehall simply cannot be prepared for, so the government needs to seriously help departments scramble and prioritise their efforts around what matters most to us come 30 March 2019.” Key facts
- ENDS- Notes for Editors 1. In the UK, the Department of Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (BEIS) is responsible for the general framework of consumer protection, and has overall policy responsibility for competition and state aid. However, a number of other bodies are responsible for enforcing all three areas. The majority of consumer law enforcement is carried out by local authority Trading Standards services, with support at the national level from the BEIS-funded National Trading Standards. The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) applies competition law and merger review, and also uses its consumer powers to tackle market-wide issues, unfair contract terms and international consumer issues. A number of other national regulators and standards bodies also contribute to meeting consumer and competition policy objectives, for example by setting product standards or regulating specific sectors and some have concurrent powers with the CMA to enforce competition rules in those sectors. 2. In the three areas that are the subject of this report (consumer protection, competition and state aid), this NAO report examines:
3. The NAO report outlines three case studies which bring to life how the current regulatory arrangements with the EU operate.
|