Labour will tomorrow (Tuesday) force a binding vote in the House
of Commons which will force the Government to allow the
Parliamentary Constituencies (Amendment) Bill to be debated in
Committee.
In another example of the broken system for Private Members
Bills, the Government has been using a procedural device to block
the clear will of the House of Commons and prevent the Bill
having its detailed line by line scrutiny in Committee.
Despite the fact that the bill passed its Second Reading
unanimously on Friday 1 December 2017, the Government have taken
the highly unusual step of refusing to table a Money resolution
which is usually required for the Bill to be debated in
Committee.
This issue has been subject to an Urgent Question and an
emergency debate, with many Tory backbenchers calling on the
Government to bring forward a money resolution so that the Bill
can be debated.
Speaking ahead of the
debate MP, Labour’s Shadow Leader of
the House, said:
“It’s clear the system for Private Members Bills is broken. The
public won’t understand why a Bill that commands unanimous
support across the elected House can be blocked by the Government
through procedural wheezes.
“This Bill would keep the number of MPs at 650 while equalising
constituency sizes in a way that allows boundaries to take into
account community ties.
“After Brexit it is clear that plans to strengthen the power
of the executive, at the expense of backbenchers. The Government
say they will look at the money resolution only after the
Boundary Commissions have reported in the Autumn. This is an
admission that this is a process entirely about the Conservative
Party’s political advantage.
“As Tory backbenchers have made clear, if the Government do not
like the Bill they should bring forward a money resolution and
vote against the Bill in the normal way.”
Ends
Notes to editors:
- The opposition day debate will take place on Tuesday 19 June
- Labour’s motion, tabled today, states:
That, notwithstanding the provisions of Standing Order No. 48 and
the practice of the House relating to the authorisation of
charges upon the public revenue, the Parliamentary Constituencies
(Amendment) Bill Committee has leave to consider the Clauses of
the Bill and any new Clauses that may be proposed to it; but the
Bill may not be reported from the Committee before this House has
passed a Money Resolution, for which the Queen’s Recommendation
has been signified, in relation to the Bill.
- Convention is that the Government brings forward a money
resolution for any Private Member’s Bill that has passed Second
Reading. The Government has recognised this in the past. In 2015
a Government Minister said:
“Once the House has given a Private Member’s Bill a Second
Reading, the convention is that the Government, even when they
robustly oppose it, always table a money resolution.”
- The Government are effectively choosing winners and losers on
Private Members Bills. This means that despite the ballot result
the Government block Bills by refusing a money resolution not by
voting it down.
The Bill
- The Bill does the following:
- Fixed size of Parliament at 650 MPs.
- Fixed allocation of 18 MPs in Northern Ireland and keeps
the protected areas already legislated for in 2011.
- Allows a 7.5% variation in electorate of any constituency
(no less than 92.5% of electoral quota, no more than 107.5%).
- Report back before 1st October 2020 and every 10th year
after that.
- Sets that the electorate calculation will use the register
of electors from the 2017 General Election and the most recent
General Election there afterwards for future reviews.
- The Bill passed second reading unanimously on
1st December 2017. The House expressed a clear
wish that the Bill be debated and scrutinised in Committee, which
has been reaffirmed in Points of Order, Business Questions and in
the unanimous cross-party response to an Urgent Question on 10
May 2018.
- There was an emergency debate on this issues on 19 May 2018.
- Labour stands ready to work with all parties to ensure that a
boundary review can go ahead in a way that benefits our
democracy, not just the Conservative Party.